413:. I would query whether that is necessarily in-depth, but my thinking is that there is likely to be more coverage in the regional press which has a chance of establishing notability (certainly for players in my part of the world I would consider this likely). It is reasonable to allow more time to be provided to search for sources where a sportsman meets the sports notability guidelines - in order to show that they meet the GNG. It is a shame that the article creator did not consider searching for news sources and has instead relied upon merely statistical sources which show that the chap existed and little else. Given that it took me less than five minutes to find those above it seems odd that an article creator couldn't be bothered to do so. Perhaps that would have avoided this going to AfD entirely.
692:, which are completely independent of either this article or this AfD debate. I refuse to be provoked by his behaviour, as I have been before out of my own frustration. I have learned from my mistakes. Telling me to "go jump in a lake" is frankly beyond the pale. Spike 'em claims that I am instructing him "which articles to edit" and that I am taking this "far too personally", both of which are outright lies.
735:
keep content up forever. Searching for older subjects can be challenging through the
Internet. Had someone raised this back in 2009, we maybe could have found the sources. Now, they are going to be very hard to find in view of the prime of 2002-3. So the presumption carries weight and we should keep.
734:
Meets SNG, so we presume sources exist. For me, one of two things should happen for SNG to carry - non-English subject (really non-Latin language subject) or historical subject (to me, five years; but others have said ten years or pre-Internet (about 1997)). Here we have the second. Websites don't
632:
This is the fourth time (I think) that an article I created has gone to AfD recently where the prose content of the article has not changed in the eight years since I created the article. Not a criticism, John, just a frustration. I added as much prose content then as I could, and nobody has added to
664:
Sorry, I misphrased, I didn't take it that way at all. My criticism certainly wasn't directed towards you - more that I was tickled at the fact that the article has been in the same state for the last eight years and suddenly someone has rocked up and decided they don't like it. The fact that their
497:
That's a difficult one to answer, Bobo. I would say we need something at the end of the opening sentence because it's here that we are confirming the player's status at top-level. If it's feasible to include a citation after a match summary then, yes, go for that too (I did that for
Dinaparna as we
633:
it since. Once again this is proof that it's not us as WP:CRIC members who are at fault for this, but those who randomly turn up eight years later and declare WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Couldn't these people have done so eight years ago?! Would have avoided this mess and the others...
567:
Oh, I absolutely agree. I tag things all the time and I hold the world record for application of {{refimprove}}. The problem is disruptive individuals (many of them) who cannot think in terms of "improvement needed here" and just do a knee-jerk towards AfD by default.
580:
Not strictly speaking. You're blaming
Frankenstein's monster. Not Frankenstein himself. The fact that these people don't even consider fixing the problems themselves proves that they have no interest in attempting to improve the encyclopedia. But I see what you mean.
649:
Sorry. Meant no criticism of you (or anyone else in this). Just saying that I've now put in the very basic refs and that the earlier contributions above indicate there are at least local newspaper references that could flesh this out further.
173:
510:
See I would have thought that the only reference needed would be the fact that this individual is a top level player. Which is what we already do by providing the external link. If we would rather this external link
467:. It's no good having the sources in an External Links section. They MUST be inline citations. This is where we go wrong and why so many of these AfDs appear, per the Sri Lankan one earlier. I'm not fixing this one.
226:- okay, so this WP:ONESOURCE thing is becoming an issue all of a sudden. All you need to do is request that another source be added and that will do fine. If I do that now, does that negate the need for this AfD?
535:, information in the narrative must be verified by an inline citation while links within the EL section are actually "additional reading" only. The EL is not a citation. It's exactly like citing inline a page in
636:
I would say that if an article has survived eight years without being criticized by way of an AfD, then it's probably fine as it is... (with reference to its presence on WP, not necessarily its prose content).
405:- more time needs to be provided to search for reliable, in-depth sources about this chap. It appears he played for Cleator CC and probably continues to play for Cumberland by the sounds of articles
442:
688:- worth noting that this discussion is being accompanied by significant veiled personal attacks - not all directed towards me, but towards unnamed uninvolved parties - by a certain user on
167:
310:
287:
126:
555:
I understand. All it is, is just another easily fixable problem which is better sorted by cleanup tags than sending things willy-nilly to AfD just to adhere to WP:POINT.
406:
272:
257:
451:
which mentions he was the Under-21 player of the year. Tons more like this by searching for his name in quotes and add the words
Cumberland + cricket with that.
335:
How do you read NCRIC such that you believe this individual doesn't meet NCRIC? One appearance in a major cricket match. This individual meets that criterion.
99:
94:
348:
103:
439:
133:
86:
410:
208:
requirements for cricketers at all. (Apologies if this is a mistagged AfD - I wasn't sure if it should be "Games or sports" or "Biographical".)
313:), and he played in two List A matches, which is more than some other people on that list. Does anyone here stand in this field of expertise?
445:
188:
155:
64:
305:– This is a tricky one. Every Gnews search I do comes up with stuff about other people. Despite (from my understanding) failing
17:
149:
90:
145:
744:
724:
672:
659:
644:
623:
588:
575:
562:
550:
522:
505:
490:
474:
459:
422:
389:
364:
342:
326:
294:
279:
264:
248:
233:
217:
68:
418:
195:
763:
40:
697:
Once again these complaints go beyond the sole concern pointed out on this AfD, which has no relation to either
82:
74:
448:
52:. Seems like we have some unrefuted claims of notability. Personal attacks and the like would be a topic for
414:
60:
161:
241:- a second link has been added, rendering the justification for sending this article to AfD meaningless.
759:
36:
53:
706:
689:
291:
276:
261:
181:
543:
annual, which doesn't say anything about the player, into EL as further reading about the season.
351:
and the fact that it would be unfair to delete just this one while leaving all the others intact.
740:
213:
56:
721:
669:
641:
585:
559:
519:
487:
339:
245:
230:
205:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
758:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
655:
619:
435:
611:
431:
306:
712:
702:
570:
545:
532:
500:
483:
Please forgive me, Jack. To what level do we add inline citations? Just match details?
469:
383:
358:
320:
204:
Only one "source" that's just an entry in a database for a BLP. Does not seem to meet
736:
698:
373:
209:
718:
666:
638:
582:
556:
528:
516:
484:
453:
336:
242:
227:
120:
347:
Read criterion 1 wrong. Still neutral though, as a balance between the result of
651:
615:
709:, are therefore irrelevant to this conversation, and unprovoked by myself or
378:
353:
315:
309:, it seems to be status quo to have articles about these players (see
539:
for a specific piece of information and then putting the same year's
498:
have the full scorecard). Nothing to forgive, btw. All the best.
752:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
515:
a reference, so we kill two birds with one stone, that is fine.
665:
opinion goes against basic guidelines is frankly disruptive.
116:
112:
108:
180:
288:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
766:). No further edits should be made to this page.
194:
8:
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
273:list of England-related deletion discussions
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:list of Cricket-related deletion discussions
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
285:
270:
255:
614:. Now reffed. Though more could be done.
434:by playing two List A matches, there's
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
745:00:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
725:02:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
673:10:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
660:09:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
645:11:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
624:09:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
589:19:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
576:18:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
563:15:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
551:13:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
523:12:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
506:12:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
491:22:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
475:21:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
460:19:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
423:19:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
390:20:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
376:as shown by sources found.
365:19:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
343:18:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
327:18:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
295:17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
280:17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
265:17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
249:17:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
234:17:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
218:17:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
69:19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
783:
755:Please do not modify it.
83:Robert Mason (cricketer)
75:Robert Mason (cricketer)
32:Please do not modify it.
438:in various local press
430:Apart from meeting
415:Blue Square Thing
297:
282:
267:
774:
757:
716:
456:
381:
356:
318:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
34:
782:
781:
777:
776:
775:
773:
772:
771:
770:
764:deletion review
753:
710:
527:H'mmm, no. Per
454:
379:
354:
316:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
780:
778:
769:
768:
748:
747:
728:
727:
694:
693:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
634:
627:
626:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
494:
493:
478:
477:
462:
425:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
330:
329:
299:
298:
292:Mark the train
283:
277:Mark the train
268:
262:Mark the train
252:
251:
236:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
779:
767:
765:
761:
756:
750:
749:
746:
742:
738:
733:
730:
729:
726:
723:
720:
714:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
691:
687:
684:
683:
674:
671:
668:
663:
662:
661:
657:
653:
648:
647:
646:
643:
640:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
605:
590:
587:
584:
579:
578:
577:
574:
572:
566:
565:
564:
561:
558:
554:
553:
552:
549:
547:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
521:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
504:
502:
496:
495:
492:
489:
486:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
473:
471:
466:
463:
461:
458:
457:
450:
446:
443:
440:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
400:
391:
388:
387:
386:
382:
375:
371:
368:
367:
366:
363:
362:
361:
357:
350:
346:
345:
344:
341:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
325:
324:
323:
319:
312:
308:
304:
301:
300:
296:
293:
289:
284:
281:
278:
274:
269:
266:
263:
259:
254:
253:
250:
247:
244:
240:
237:
235:
232:
229:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
65:contributions
62:
58:
57:Jo-Jo Eumerus
55:
54:WP:HAPPYPLACE
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
754:
751:
731:
707:WP:ONESOURCE
685:
607:
569:
544:
540:
536:
512:
499:
468:
464:
452:
447:, including
427:
407:such as this
402:
384:
377:
369:
359:
352:
321:
314:
302:
238:
223:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
168:free images
206:WP:ATHLETE
760:talk page
713:BlackJack
403:More time
311:this list
37:talk page
762:or in a
737:RonSigPi
612:WP:NCRIC
610:. Meets
541:Playfair
436:coverage
432:WP:NCRIC
372:– Meets
349:this RfC
307:WP:NCRIC
210:Nerd1a4i
127:View log
39:or in a
703:WP:CRIN
690:WT:CRIC
686:Comment
533:WP:CITE
465:Comment
455:Lugnuts
303:Comment
239:Comment
224:Comment
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
699:WP:GNG
652:Johnlp
616:Johnlp
537:Wisden
146:Google
104:delete
529:WP:EL
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
741:talk
732:Keep
719:Bobo
705:but
667:Bobo
656:talk
639:Bobo
620:talk
608:Keep
583:Bobo
571:Jack
557:Bobo
546:Jack
531:and
517:Bobo
501:Jack
485:Bobo
470:Jack
449:this
428:Keep
419:talk
411:this
409:and
370:Keep
337:Bobo
243:Bobo
228:Bobo
214:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
61:talk
50:keep
701:or
385:947
374:GNG
360:947
322:947
196:TWL
125:– (
743:)
717:.
658:)
622:)
573:|
548:|
513:be
503:|
472:|
444:,
441:,
421:)
290:.
275:.
260:.
216:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:)
63:,
739:(
722:.
715::
711:@
670:.
654:(
642:.
618:(
586:.
560:.
520:.
488:.
417:(
380:J
355:J
340:.
317:J
246:.
231:.
212:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.