340:
these 20 results and tell me what their quality reveals. For a start, if this article is to be kept, I would expect to see all the cited references in the article to be properly spelled out, with all their authors, and with their PMIDs supplied, because that allows access to their abstracts. Currently the article doesn't have that.
237:- As far as I can tell, his most prominent publications in refereed journals have been co-authored by many many other people. Several things strange about this: 1) Why not list the co-authors and give them credit? 2) None of his co-authors have wikpedia pages. I can't see why he should have one, while the others do not. E.G.:
211:
The first paragraph of the article is self-advertising puffery. The second is a list of his education. He says he is an
Assistant prof. at a Phila med School. Oddly, he does not list their web site as a source--but checking their catalog I find him listed as a Clinical Assistant Professor, which is
203:
Only three of the article the page lists were peer-reviewed. This is below the average, so he does not qualify as a scientist. As a clinician, giving intrviews and speaking at meetings does not make him notable, All medical specialists do that, as a form of advertising. If a medical proceedure is
339:
I don't know enough about WP's criteria for notability of clinicians. However, when I go to www.pubmed.org and search for "robert worthington-kirsch" I see a list of 20 search results that look quite legit. I could be persuaded to give a definite vote for or against deletion if someone can look at
215:
We need a special N standard for clinicians, because he isnt the first to try to get listed in WP. When they actually have done significant research, or won academic awards, then they deserve to get in as academics. He hasn't and doesn't. And as a clinician, an notable clinician would have quite a
110:
83:
78:
87:
70:
271:
168:
Noted as prominent provider of the procedure in interview with Dr Scott
Goodwin, one of the originators of the producedure in esi-topics.com
283:
300:
17:
190:
268:, and the list goes on and on. I wish he would put up the co-authors names and properly credit them for the articles he lists.
344:
311:
287:
222:
129:
52:
326:
36:
74:
325:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
279:
66:
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
178:
186:
265:
238:
182:
261:
275:
257:
250:
126:
254:
246:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
122:
118:
341:
49:
204:
only mentioed in a couple of local sources, then it isnt notable as a clinical advance.
304:
162:
Speaker at
National Conference on New Advances in Women's Health, McLean VA 10/1999
104:
308:
218:
319:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150:
invited speaker at
British Society of Interventional Radiology
153:
Quoted in
Springfield MO News Leader aticle on UAE 9/12/04
100:
96:
92:
117:
Does not meet notability guideline for Wiki
Biography
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
329:). No further edits should be made to this page.
212:not the same and probably not just carelessness.
159:Quoted in article in Diagnoastic Imaging 8/1/06
156:Quoted in article in HealthMeasures.com 9/8/03
8:
165:Published article in Endovascular Today 1/06
141:- Google search reveals 560 hits including:
147:Feature news story on NBC-10 Philadelphia
121:. Also, single contributor, possibly,
303:is only just good enough to get past
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
171:referenced in 4 books on Amazon
1:
345:22:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
312:14:48, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
288:09:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
223:05:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
130:18:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
53:22:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
361:
301:google news archive search
67:Robert Worthington-Kirsch
59:Robert Worthington-Kirsch
322:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
197:
274:comment was added by
144:
299:- very marginal. A
216:lot more to show.
291:
195:
181:comment added by
352:
324:
269:
266:James F Benenati
239:Francis Hutchins
194:
175:
108:
90:
34:
360:
359:
355:
354:
353:
351:
350:
349:
333:
327:deletion review
320:
270:—The preceding
176:
81:
65:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
358:
356:
348:
347:
332:
331:
315:
314:
293:
292:
276:Hollerbackgril
262:Benjie B Mills
230:
228:
227:
226:
225:
213:
206:
205:
173:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
143:
142:
134:
127:Hollerbackgril
115:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
357:
346:
343:
338:
335:
334:
330:
328:
323:
317:
316:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
294:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
267:
263:
259:
258:John C Lipman
256:
252:
251:James B Spies
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
231:
224:
221:
220:
214:
210:
209:
208:
207:
202:
199:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
145:
140:
137:
136:
135:
132:
131:
128:
124:
120:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
336:
321:
318:
296:
255:Jay M Cooper
247:George Popky
234:
229:
217:
200:
177:— Preceding
174:
138:
133:
116:
45:
43:
31:
28:
243:R Berkowitz
183:Purplemouse
46:Weak Delete
342:EdJohnston
50:Cbrown1023
297:Weak keep
284:contribs
272:unsigned
191:contribs
179:unsigned
111:View log
337:Neutral
139:Comment
123:WP:VAIN
84:protect
79:history
309:Addhoc
235:Delete
201:delete
119:WP:BIO
88:delete
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
307:...
305:WP:N
280:talk
187:talk
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
219:DGG
109:- (
286:)
282:•
264:,
260:,
253:,
249:,
245:,
241:,
193:)
189:•
125:--
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
290:.
278:(
185:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.