115:, contributed by the apparent great-grand-daughter of the subject. This does not mean that the subject might not have been a good or interesting person; he just wasn't notable/noted in any particular field for a contribution meriting recognition in an encyclopedia. One's ancestry may be important to oneself, but it's generally frowned upon to use Knowledge (XXG) for self-promotion of a biographical sort.
456:, he is notable enough for Knowledge (XXG). But anything based on oral family tradition and not verifiable through published sources should really be removed for the time being (until it has been published in a journal article or some other citable publication). Once that has been done, neither notability nor verifiability seems to be in question.
532:. I disagree with Leflyman's view that someone might be notable enough for the Polish WP but not the English WP. English-speaking readers might want to know about notable Poles. This article has no interwiki link, though. The editors working on the Polish-language Knowledge (XXG) would be better placed to evaluate the
582:
With notable historic figures that aren't exactly George
Washington, I assume there will be zero ghits and am surprised people use the google test on them. The print references cited above and in the article satisfy the "non-trivial published works" clause of WP:BIO. Notable in Poland does not mean
563:
that mentions Rodryg Dunin, other info on him in the PL WP apparently is on Elonka's userpage. I would note that while the Polish
Wikipedians are very active (more articles than the Spanish version), they still only have about 1/6th the number of articles of the English version, it may just be a case
396:
Regardless of notability, it's a vanity bio using the contributors own work as primary references. This same contributor relentlessly demands secondary references on articles she deems unworthy and nominates for deletion so she should hold herself to the same standard (or stop being so relentless in
506:
and remove unverified facts until we can specifically link them to sources. We have sources to use, but we have no way to link the sources to specific facts. If the facts asserted are linked via inline citations, we can keep them. There may be a COI problem here, but that is a
276:. Though I'll agree that there's very little Google-able information, there are multiple references in Polish (which are listed in the References section). For example, it's easy enough to doublecheck that Rodryg Dunin is listed in the Polish Biographical Dictionary (
191:) apparently has been spreading copies her family tree around the web quite a bit. I thought Rodryg might get an automatic inclusion as a count, but apparently in Poland being a count is roughly as notable as being a
564:
where they haven't drilled far enough down the stack of articles that need to be written to get to Rodryg yet. Also, apparently Elonka doesn't write in Polish ;-) That reminds me, I'm thirsty for a frosty bottle of
364:: Let's be clear here: according to its article, there are over 25,000 names in the 42 volumes of the "Polish Biographical Dictionary." That to me doesn't raise it to the notability requirements of
491:
309:
17:
404:
137:
544:
452:
82:
77:
468:
per
Uppland ... it certainly needs cleanup to only verifiable information... but I believe the notability criteria is passed.
86:
416:
446:
203:) for what it's worth. I don't doubt other references could be drummed up by the author, the question to me is notability.
428:
To my knowledge, the entry in the Polish
Biographical Dictionary was written in 1928, about 30 years before I was born. --
69:
602:
494:. Added to that, this article is pretty blatantly un-NPOV. My inclination is to delete, but will hold my vote for now.
36:
323:
536:
listing and other issues. If the Polish WP has an article, this should be an automatic Keep; if not, I'm undecided.
348:
please if it is notable enough for polski słownik it is also notable enough for an encyclopedia not limited by paper
601:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
306:
519:
587:
572:
548:
524:
498:
482:
460:
432:
423:
407:
401:
384:
352:
340:
314:
303:
288:
268:
237:
211:
177:
173:
158:
154:
144:
123:
51:
541:
149:
Indeed. If you add -Elonka, you get 17 distinct hits and most of them look like Wiki mirrors anyway.
233:
476:
333:
281:
73:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
515:
one. This person seems notable enough by the references listed at the end of the article. --
228:
495:
398:
200:
196:
192:
169:
150:
373:
369:
365:
112:
537:
187:
That's apparently what they did with this page on the Polish
Knowledge (XXG). The author (
224:
420:
250:
48:
133:
584:
569:
516:
379:
208:
118:
469:
457:
349:
329:
188:
65:
57:
103:
280:), which affirms notability. A transcript of the original Polish can be seen at
429:
285:
397:
demanding every article be fully referenced from secondary / tertiary sources)
141:
296:— I can't see why we would delete this, article makes a claim to notability.
207:
Looks like notability has been established sufficiently, if not strongly.
168:
as unverifiable, unless someone can come up with some reliable sources.
368:
for the
English Knowledge (XXG); for the Polish WP, sure. However,
595:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
372:
a "Who's Who" directory of geneological entries, nor is it a
199:. He did get an article in the Polski Słownika Biograficzny,(
99:
95:
91:
560:
583:
non-notable for an
English language encyclopedia. --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
605:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
195:, and he and his family are not on the
490:: same, but stronger, concerns as for
415:. Did the same contributor write the
330:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
559:page in the Polish Knowledge (XXG)
111:Non-notable bio; uncited, entirely
444:. If he is notable enough for the
374:memorial to our deceased ancestors
326:, who are we to argue otherwise?--
24:
249:userfy this or similar material.
453:Dictionary of National Biography
450:, the Polish equivalent of the
417:Polish Biographical Dictionary
46:no consensus, default to keep.
1:
588:22:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
549:11:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
525:04:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
499:05:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
483:04:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
461:23:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
433:23:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
424:22:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
408:22:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
385:02:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
353:22:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
341:21:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
315:19:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
289:19:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
269:16:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
238:12:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
212:11:34, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
178:08:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
159:08:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
145:08:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
124:07:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
573:02:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
52:16:10, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
534:Polski Slownik Biograficzny
447:Polski słownik biograficzny
324:Polski Slownik Biograficzny
322:. If he is notable for the
278:Polski Slownik Biograficzny
219:, per Sarah. Consider this
622:
227:is fufilled and therefore
598:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
197:list of Polish magnates
370:Knowledge (XXG) is not
134:verifiability concerns
561:re the Dunin family
382:
121:
547:
378:
313:
282:Talk:Rodryg Dunin
117:
113:Original Research
613:
600:
540:
522:
481:
474:
383:
338:
336:
312:
297:
266:
263:
260:
257:
193:Kentucky colonel
122:
107:
89:
34:
621:
620:
616:
615:
614:
612:
611:
610:
609:
603:deletion review
596:
520:
511:problem, not a
479:
470:
377:
339:
334:
328:
310:52278 Alpha 771
304:Fenton, Matthew
298:
264:
261:
258:
255:
116:
80:
64:
61:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
619:
617:
608:
607:
591:
590:
576:
575:
552:
551:
527:
501:
485:
463:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
390:
389:
388:
387:
356:
355:
343:
327:
317:
291:
271:
251:Andrew Lenahan
245:and please do
240:
214:
180:
163:
162:
161:
109:
108:
60:
55:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
618:
606:
604:
599:
593:
592:
589:
586:
581:
578:
577:
574:
571:
567:
562:
558:
555:There is one
554:
553:
550:
546:
543:
539:
535:
531:
528:
526:
523:
518:
514:
510:
505:
502:
500:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
478:
475:
473:
467:
464:
462:
459:
455:
454:
449:
448:
443:
440:
434:
431:
427:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
409:
406:
403:
400:
395:
392:
391:
386:
381:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
359:
358:
357:
354:
351:
347:
344:
342:
337:
331:
325:
321:
318:
316:
311:
308:
305:
301:
295:
292:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
267:
252:
248:
244:
241:
239:
236:
235:
234:Daniel.Bryant
231:established.
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
213:
210:
206:
202:
201:see this list
198:
194:
190:
186:
185:
181:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
143:
139:
135:
131:
128:
127:
126:
125:
120:
114:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
84:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
62:
59:
56:
54:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
597:
594:
579:
565:
557:encyclopedia
556:
533:
529:
512:
508:
503:
487:
471:
465:
451:
445:
441:
412:
393:
361:
345:
319:
299:
293:
277:
273:
254:
246:
242:
232:
220:
216:
204:
189:Elonka Dunin
183:
182:
165:
129:
110:
66:Rodryg Dunin
58:Rodryg Dunin
45:
43:
31:
28:
496:Ohconfucius
170:Sarah Ewart
151:Sarah Ewart
138:check ghits
538:JamesMLane
419:as well?
307:Lexic Dark
229:notability
421:RFerreira
413:Undecided
205:Weak keep
49:Sandstein
585:Oakshade
570:Tubezone
530:Question
513:deletion
458:Upp◦land
380:Leflyman
221:stricken
209:Tubezone
119:Leflyman
509:cleanup
492:Antonin
488:Comment
472:ALKIVAR
362:Comment
350:Yuckfoo
83:protect
78:history
517:Jayron
430:Elonka
394:Delete
366:WP:BIO
300:thanks
286:Elonka
243:Delete
217:Delete
184:Userfy
166:Delete
130:Delete
87:delete
335:talk
225:WP:RS
142:MER-C
104:views
96:watch
92:links
16:<
580:Keep
566:piwo
504:Keep
466:Keep
442:Keep
346:keep
320:Keep
294:Keep
284:. --
274:Keep
174:Talk
155:Talk
100:logs
74:talk
70:edit
376:.--
262:bli
247:not
223:if
568:.
521:32
405:ie
402:rr
399:Ga
265:nd
259:ar
256:St
253:-
176:)
157:)
140:.
136:,
132:-
102:|
98:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
76:|
72:|
545:c
542:t
480:☢
477:™
332:|
302:/
172:(
153:(
106:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.