Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

818:. There's been a large amount of media coverage of his record on the show, which occurred only a few days ago. History indicates that the holders of Jeopardy records continue to receive attention for a long time after their accomplishments (similar to holders of sports records). Now that I think of that analogy, I propose that record winners on Jeopardy should be treated like people who have held world records in track & field (athletics), who are deemed notable under 585:
He broke the records of Ken Jennings for one-day winnings and Larissa Kelly for "Highest 5-game total on Jeopardy!, first 5 games (unadjusted)". Since, as evidenced by those articles, Knowledge (XXG) is documenting the "records" aspect of Jeopardy, and he's the holder for two of the more notable
956:
thing is news to me. I've never seen that suggested before, and find it a pretty strange interpretation of the rule which, to me, has absolutely nothing to do with whether the event is good, neutral, or catastrophic :). No offense intended, just think that's a very novel take on the rule.
164: 439:, to offer another example, is a pretty non-notable tennis player, except for his record-setting 11 hour match. If it is general policy to acknowledge record-holders, Craig meets that threshold, having broken a record of long standing. 922:
I agree with Orlady. These people have earned their spot in the history of one of the most popular game shows. Verifiability is not a problem, and I don't think we need to fret about BLP1E when the "event" is clearly a
981:
As I recall, the main impetus to create the rule was to prevent undue harm to people associated with scandals or embarrassing incidents. IMO, this article doesn't really violate the "spirit" of BLP1E.
158: 456:
Your reference to Isner is completely specious, if not outright mendacious. The Isner article contains a lot more information than just "participated in the longest tennis match in history."
119: 92: 87: 96: 235: 230: 768: 239: 124: 79: 669:. He broke a show record on the show, but did absolutely nothing else of note. Should he remain in the public eye for a long time á la Ken Jennings, then he'd make the cut. 214:
I am also nominating the following related page for the same reasons for deletion as above—non-notable game show contestants, both who appeared on eight episodes or less:
222: 794: 629:
People who get published in the Guinness Book of World Records, or have a notable athletic record, are notable, even when someone beats their record later on.
506:
The only thing that he did was play on Jeopardy for one week. If there is an article on notable Jeopardy contestants, he should be noted there instead.
730:
There are over 91,400 Google hits for "Roger Craig" Jeopardy and over 130 news articles. It certainly shows the notability even after his run is over.
179: 146: 83: 484: 692: 674: 540: 342:
is notable not so much for his Jeopardy win but because we has able to turn it into a streak of mini-celebrity afterwards. Not this guy.
140: 1032: 995: 972: 940: 914: 881: 858: 831: 809: 783: 756: 721: 696: 678: 652: 620: 595: 577: 548: 523: 488: 465: 448: 410: 382: 361: 326: 304: 276: 208: 75: 67: 61: 136: 17: 186: 615: 572: 226: 388: 1047: 36: 905:. Maybe re-evaluate AfD when someone breaks his single-day record. (Full disclosure: I think Roger Craig is a badass) 846: 378: 218: 152: 910: 57: 750: 742: 517: 509: 1046:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
544: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
927:
thing. (Full disclosure: I have the same real-world name as one of the competitors under discussion here.)
737: 607:. In this case if someone breaks his records, then automaticaly become unnotable. Thus he is not notable. 435:
Does WP have a policy acknowledging record-holders in sports? It appears to in some cases (e.g., golf).
314: 967: 906: 299: 271: 203: 53: 536: 1009:
If the record is notable enough to get this much news coverage, then it is a notable accomplishment.
714: 591: 587: 461: 457: 819: 561: 557: 532: 286: 444: 172: 991: 936: 849:, for the same reasons. (When I first !voted, I didn't notice that this was a two-article AfD. -- 613: 570: 480: 666: 604: 335: 49: 877: 805: 779: 320: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1010: 958: 854: 827: 731: 630: 290: 709: 374: 440: 392: 343: 983: 928: 894: 608: 565: 476: 873: 801: 775: 497: 422: 339: 256: 113: 850: 823: 539:. Not opposed to being mentioned in the appropriate Jeopardy! article/section.-- 902: 436: 370: 898: 369:
Larissa Kelly has her article. So does Tom Walsh. So why not Roger Craig?
586:
ones, it makes sense to have an article on him in Knowledge (XXG).
872:
per Orlady (full disclosure: Roger is a long-time friend of mine).
1040:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
496:- Knowledge (XXG) is not the Guinness Book of Gameshow Trivia. — 52:
argument does not appear to have been substantially rebutted.
252: 248: 244: 109: 105: 101: 171: 952:This BLP1E only being relevant when the event is a 185: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1050:). No further edits should be made to this page. 769:list of Television-related deletion discussions 687:My !vote also applies to Tom Walsh's article. 8: 795:list of People-related deletion discussions 789: 763: 285:Clearly a figure of transient notability. 793:: This debate has been included in the 767:: This debate has been included in the 560:(winning many money on a game show) and 421:More pertinently — why any of them? — 334:non-notable or, at best, notable for 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 195:Non-notable game show contestant. 76:Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) 68:Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant) 24: 847:Tom Walsh (Jeopardy! contestant) 219:Tom Walsh (Jeopardy! contestant) 562:Knowledge (XXG) is not the news 996:23:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 973:18:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 941:06:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 915:00:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 882:15:48, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 859:02:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 832:15:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 810:23:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 784:23:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 757:02:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC) 722:19:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 708:both. No enduring notability. 697:20:30, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 679:18:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 621:18:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 596:18:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 578:18:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 549:17:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 524:17:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 489:14:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 449:14:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 411:12:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 383:11:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 362:11:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 327:07:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 305:05:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 277:12:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 209:04:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 1033:03:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 653:03:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 466:01:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC) 287:Knowledge (XXG) is not news 62:04:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) 1067: 605:Notability is no temporary 558:only notable for one event 1043:Please do not modify it. 475:- un-notable biography. 32:Please do not modify it. 389:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 695:and a clue-bat • 677:and a clue-bat • 44:The result was 812: 798: 786: 772: 500:, Sept. 25, 2010. 425:, Sept. 25, 2010. 1058: 1045: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 987: 970: 965: 932: 799: 773: 753: 748: 745: 718: 712: 690: 689:Ten Pound Hammer 672: 671:Ten Pound Hammer 649: 646: 643: 640: 637: 634: 611: 568: 520: 515: 512: 408: 405: 402: 399: 359: 356: 353: 350: 325: 323: 318: 302: 297: 275: 267: 260: 242: 207: 199: 190: 189: 175: 127: 117: 99: 34: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1048:deletion review 1041: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 985: 968: 959: 930: 907:-- mitchsurp -- 751: 746: 743: 716: 710: 688: 670: 647: 644: 641: 638: 635: 632: 618: 609: 575: 566: 518: 513: 510: 406: 403: 400: 397: 357: 354: 351: 348: 321: 315: 313: 300: 291: 269: 265: 233: 217: 201: 197: 132: 123: 90: 74: 71: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1064: 1062: 1053: 1052: 1036: 1035: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 976: 975: 944: 943: 917: 884: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 835: 834: 813: 787: 761: 760: 759: 725: 702: 701: 700: 699: 682: 681: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 624: 623: 616: 599: 598: 580: 573: 551: 541:137.122.49.102 526: 501: 491: 470: 469: 468: 433:Qualified Keep 429: 428: 427: 426: 416: 415: 414: 413: 393:Andrew Lenahan 364: 344:Andrew Lenahan 336:one event only 329: 307: 262: 261: 215: 193: 192: 129: 125:AfD statistics 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1063: 1051: 1049: 1044: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1008: 1005: 1004: 997: 994: 993: 989: 980: 979: 978: 977: 974: 971: 966: 964: 963: 955: 951: 948: 947: 946: 945: 942: 939: 938: 934: 926: 921: 918: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 895:Larissa Kelly 892: 888: 885: 883: 879: 875: 871: 868: 867: 860: 856: 852: 848: 845: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 814: 811: 807: 803: 796: 792: 788: 785: 781: 777: 770: 766: 762: 758: 755: 754: 749: 739: 738:WP:GOOGLEHITS 735: 734: 733: 729: 726: 723: 720: 719: 713: 707: 704: 703: 698: 694: 686: 685: 684: 683: 680: 676: 668: 665: 662: 661: 654: 651: 650: 628: 627: 626: 625: 622: 619: 614: 612: 606: 603: 602: 601: 600: 597: 593: 589: 584: 581: 579: 576: 571: 569: 563: 559: 555: 552: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 527: 525: 522: 521: 516: 505: 502: 499: 495: 492: 490: 486: 485:contributions 482: 478: 474: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 452: 451: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 431: 430: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 412: 409: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 365: 363: 360: 345: 341: 337: 333: 330: 328: 324: 319: 317: 311: 308: 306: 303: 298: 296: 295: 288: 284: 281: 280: 279: 278: 273: 268: 258: 254: 250: 246: 241: 237: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 213: 212: 211: 210: 205: 200: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 130: 126: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1042: 1039: 1011: 1006: 990: 961: 960: 953: 949: 935: 924: 919: 890: 886: 869: 843: 815: 790: 764: 740: 727: 715: 705: 663: 631: 582: 553: 528: 507: 503: 493: 472: 453: 432: 396: 366: 347: 340:Ken Jennings 331: 322:XANDERLIPTAK 316: 309: 293: 292: 282: 264: 263: 196: 194: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 45: 43: 31: 28: 736:Please see 732:Desperado28 537:WP:ONEEVENT 312:per above. 266:Sottolacqua 198:Sottolacqua 159:free images 903:John Isner 820:WP:ATHLETE 711:Jimmy Pitt 693:his otters 675:his otters 588:Heatkernel 533:WP:NOTNEWS 458:Mtiffany71 437:John Isner 920:Keep both 899:Tom Walsh 802:• Gene93k 776:• Gene93k 556:as he is 441:271828182 54:T. Canens 962:ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ 954:not good 667:WP:BLP1E 617:Contribs 610:Armbrust 574:Contribs 567:Armbrust 477:Sjones23 379:contribs 294:ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ 120:View log 50:WP:BLP1E 950:Comment 891:Userify 874:Raul654 498:Carrite 454:Comment 423:Carrite 236:protect 231:history 165:WP refs 153:scholar 93:protect 88:history 851:Orlady 824:Orlady 747:master 744:Carpet 706:Delete 664:Delete 554:Delete 531:- per 529:Delete 514:master 511:Carpet 504:Delete 494:Delete 473:Delete 332:Delete 310:Delete 283:Delete 240:delete 137:Google 97:delete 48:. The 46:delete 1028:Focus 984:Zagal 929:Zagal 842:Also 648:Focus 371:Us441 257:views 249:watch 245:links 180:JSTOR 141:books 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 1007:Keep 969:bomb 925:good 911:talk 901:and 893:per 887:Keep 878:talk 870:Keep 855:talk 844:Keep 828:talk 822:. -- 816:Keep 806:talk 791:Note 780:talk 765:Note 728:Keep 717:talk 592:talk 583:Keep 545:talk 481:talk 462:talk 445:talk 387:See 375:talk 367:Keep 301:bomb 272:talk 253:logs 227:talk 223:edit 204:talk 173:FENS 147:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 992:^^^ 937:^^^ 889:or 800:-- 774:-- 752:101 564:. 519:101 404:bli 355:bli 338:. 187:TWL 122:• 118:– ( 988:jo 933:jo 913:) 897:, 880:) 857:) 830:) 808:) 797:. 782:) 771:. 741:-- 724:** 691:, 673:, 594:) 547:) 535:, 508:-- 487:) 483:- 464:) 447:) 407:nd 401:ar 398:St 395:- 391:. 381:) 377:)( 358:nd 352:ar 349:St 346:- 289:. 255:| 251:| 247:| 243:| 238:| 234:| 229:| 225:| 167:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 1025:m 1022:a 1019:e 1016:r 1013:D 986:e 931:e 909:( 876:( 853:( 826:( 804:( 778:( 645:m 642:a 639:e 636:r 633:D 590:( 543:( 479:( 460:( 443:( 373:( 274:) 270:( 259:) 221:( 206:) 202:( 191:) 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 131:( 128:) 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
WP:BLP1E
T. Canens
talk
04:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant)
Roger Craig (Jeopardy! contestant)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
talk
04:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑