582:. Jim Garrison's book, which is referred to as further reading in the Craig article, besides all the different mentions of him listed there in that section, also has a picture of Craig in the office of Dallas Police Sheriff Captain Will Fritz on the evening of November 22, 1963. The picture is among all pictures published by Garrison in his book between pages 218 and 219. The photo is there because Captain Fritz denied Craig's presence in the office on that day and at that time, until the photo was revealed years later. Has this photo been ever "debunked" by the deniers of any conspiracy in the assassination of President Kennedy? If it has not, this would be enough reason, in my view, to keep and expand/improve this article.
238:. One of a bazillion witness called by either the Warren Commission or Jim Garrison. The conspiracy-minded get off on his testimony because he said he saw Oswald escape Dealey Plaza with a possible co-conspirator, but despite this there is no significant coverage about him in reliable secondary sources. What we are left with is a form of a coat rack onto which one can hang links to various conspiracy books, websites, and You Tube videos. (I don't see anything to merge, but I'm fine with redirect/merge to
470:
The classification of this article as infringing upon "Coatracking" is an allegation that is as absurd as I've heard anywhere, since there is no secret or hidden meaning why we have decided to write upon this man. Nothing here is construed for what it is not. Craig was an important witness in the JFK
340:
The thing is that there's nothing here which says anything beyond "he was a guy in the sheriff's office who was a bystander at the JFK assassination". Presumably you're going to want to complain about all the material that was removed, but we're going to have severe problems with the website used as
325:
Yes, I say "privately well-known," since there has been some effort to keep the knowledge of these things out of public schools, government printing presses, newspapers, etc., therefore, the knowledge of the affairs relating to JFK's assassination has been acquired by many, many individuals chiefly
297:
are sufficient grounds to warrant a separate article on himself. After all, he was an important witness in events leading-up to and during the assassination of US President John F. Kennedy. It is my personal view that people should be allowed to formulate their own opinions, without undue
355:
You don't think that a witness who was questioned by the Warren
Commission, and who was sought after by New Orleans' Attorney Jim Garrison, is worthy of a Wiki article explaining who he is and how he fits in to the JFK assassination conspiracy, whether it be theory or
396:, since witnesses and their testimonies differ one from the other, separate articles on them (in the JFK assassination conspiracy theory) should not be considered a "fork" of some other similar article. Each article on each individual has its own merits.
199:, we'll have to discuss deleting it outright first. Anyway, the trial was a farce, the book which is the only non-primary source was roundly panned, and this fellow, whatever one can dig up from primary sources, is unimportant.
451:
and there is zero justification for standalone articles. All of the content is currently being discussed in enough detail at other articles, in spite of the instance of the administrator who reversed the redirect.
164:
264:
526:
and otherwise a fairly well-known figure in the assassination who participated in the Warren
Commission proceedings, the Clay Shaw trial, several documentaries, and various books on the subject.
561:
Actually, when the article was first written, we brought down plenty of sourcing, but for some reason the article was considerably cut down in size and the sourcing deleted.
117:
497:
243:
158:
543:
into the trial article or the conspiracy theory article (or both)... per ONEEVENT. Not enough sourcing on the subject himself to merit a stand alone article.
370:
No. Unless he has some significance beyond those activities, he should be covered within them. As mentioned elswwhere here, this looks a good deal like
500:. No matter of what kind, he gave a testimony in court of law. There are enough adequate sources. Deleting completely would not be fair in my opinion. —
124:
90:
85:
17:
94:
77:
179:
146:
607:
40:
392:
Besides the reasons I've given above, Roger D. Craig and his testimony have been written about in many books. As for
457:
531:
140:
453:
505:
588:
570:
552:
535:
514:
480:
461:
423:
405:
387:
365:
350:
335:
307:
282:
255:
230:
208:
136:
59:
275:
603:
36:
186:
527:
56:
523:
566:
476:
401:
361:
331:
303:
172:
81:
548:
493:
419:
383:
251:
239:
226:
218:
196:
51:
270:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
602:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
448:
371:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
586:
346:
204:
152:
319:
562:
472:
397:
357:
327:
299:
73:
65:
195:
Since we apparently cannot simply redirect this bit player in a JFK conspiracy to the
544:
415:
379:
247:
222:
111:
298:
interference in that process, especially in what is already privately well-known.
583:
342:
200:
471:
murder conspiracy theory, and deserves his rightful place in
American history.
410:
Ahh, so the sekret kabal mentioned above kept the TRVTH from the PVBLIC by
221:, and deal with anything worth keeping there. No independent notability.
393:
375:
326:
through private research, and is now known largely in the private sector.
596:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
265:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
171:
185:
293:. The man's background and his involvement in the
498:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories
244:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
610:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
263:Note: This debate has been included in the
262:
197:trial in which he made a minor appearance
316:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
522:. Individual is sufficiently
627:
589:22:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
571:19:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
553:15:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
424:00:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
406:21:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
388:20:12, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
366:19:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
351:22:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
60:16:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
536:19:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
515:18:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
481:17:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
462:12:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
336:17:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
308:13:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
283:06:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
256:05:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
231:04:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
209:04:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
599:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
374:, with a side order of
414:, then? Wise choice.
317:Privately well known?
295:JFK Conspiracy Theory
447:. This is clearly a
494:Trial of Clay Shaw
412:hiding it in books
240:Trial of Clay Shaw
219:Trial of Clay Shaw
52:Trial of Clay Shaw
285:
57:Black Kite (talk)
618:
601:
513:
511:
510:
504:
280:
278:
273:
190:
189:
175:
127:
115:
97:
34:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:deletion review
597:
528:Earl of Arundel
507:
506:
502:
501:
276:
271:
269:
132:
123:
88:
72:
69:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
613:
612:
592:
591:
576:
575:
574:
573:
556:
555:
538:
517:
486:
485:
484:
483:
465:
464:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
372:WP:COATracking
311:
310:
287:
286:
259:
258:
233:
193:
192:
129:
74:Roger D. Craig
68:
66:Roger D. Craig
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
611:
609:
605:
600:
594:
593:
590:
587:
585:
581:
578:
577:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
539:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
516:
512:
509:
503:usernamekiran
499:
495:
491:
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
459:
455:
450:
446:
443:
442:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
337:
333:
329:
324:
323:
321:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
305:
301:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
281:
279:
274:
266:
261:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
598:
595:
579:
540:
519:
508:
489:
444:
411:
294:
290:
272:CAPTAIN RAJU
268:
235:
214:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
120:
49:
47:
31:
28:
449:WP:COATrack
159:free images
524:WP:NOTABLE
341:a source.
604:talk page
563:Davidbena
473:Davidbena
398:Davidbena
358:Davidbena
328:Davidbena
300:Davidbena
50:merge to
37:talk page
606:or in a
545:Blueboar
416:Anmccaff
394:POV fork
380:Anmccaff
376:POV fork
248:Location
223:Anmccaff
118:View log
39:or in a
496:and/or
165:WP refs
153:scholar
91:protect
86:history
584:warshy
445:Delete
343:Mangoe
236:Delete
201:Mangoe
137:Google
95:delete
541:Merge
490:Merge
356:fact?
320:TINSK
246:.) -
215:Merge
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
580:Keep
567:talk
549:talk
532:talk
520:Keep
477:talk
458:talk
420:talk
402:talk
384:talk
362:talk
347:talk
332:talk
304:talk
291:Keep
252:talk
227:talk
205:talk
173:FENS
147:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
492:to
454:jps
378:.
277:(✉)
242:or
217:to
187:TWL
116:– (
55:.
569:)
551:)
534:)
479:)
460:)
422:)
404:)
386:)
364:)
349:)
334:)
322:!
306:)
267:.
254:)
229:)
207:)
167:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
565:(
547:(
530:(
475:(
456:(
418:(
400:(
382:(
360:(
345:(
330:(
302:(
250:(
225:(
203:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
121:·
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.