Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Romi Mankin - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

370: 459:* Is this not OK for that: The Estonian Physical Society is Estonia's national society for Physicists - This is indicated by it being recognised by/affiliated to the Estonian Academy of Sciences and to the European Physical Society. The Estonian Academy of Sciences is the body recognised by the Estonian gov. ( 304:: I think his being awarded the Estonian Physical Society 2002 EPS Award (see Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Physics and Mathematics Jun 2002 p124) should be sufficient for WP:Prof 2 "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." ( 411:
Dear TimothyRias, I have added the EPS's Aastapreemia laureaatide nimekiri (Translatable as Award Winners List) to the article. Is it OK now or do you think Xxnathippe's concerns are not sufficiently answered by my weak repsonse? That is do we need some direct evidence that Estonia's national physics
499:
I guess I was hoping a national physics society's Annual Award would be OK - I am not sure how to find a ref to say this is prestigious ..... Oh dear! :) Perhaps it being announced in the Estonian Academy of Sciences's Proceedings could be taken to be indicative of prestige? But this might be
396:
About the first source. No, it isn't since that only states that he was nominated for the prize, whatever that may mean. The other two sources are in Estonian, so I cannot really verify what they say. Although, it appears that the second one is indeed a list of
157: 259: 330:
The Estonian Physical Society is Estonia's national society for Physicists (This is indicated by it being recognised by/affiliated to the Estonian Academy of Sciences and to the European Physical Society
188:
As far as I can tell unnotable. (h-index=10 and total citations=215 accoding to google scholar, which is a less than stellar impact for a theoretical physicist of his age with a permanent position.)
118: 233: 151: 583: 17: 91: 86: 95: 340:
What is the source of doubt about this meeting WP:Prof #2 Highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national level? (
172: 613:
The list of names establishes (a) that the subject received the award and (b) that the award is not highly prestigious.
139: 78: 670: 36: 669:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
292: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
133: 579: 571: 575: 450: 432: 402: 360: 201: 193: 129: 654: 622: 607: 587: 558: 526: 509: 491: 468: 454: 436: 421: 406: 390: 364: 349: 313: 296: 274: 248: 223: 205: 60: 618: 554: 522: 487: 288: 179: 165: 650: 603: 505: 464: 417: 386: 345: 309: 270: 244: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
442: 284: 446: 428: 398: 356: 197: 189: 82: 614: 550: 518: 483: 145: 219: 51: 374: 371:
Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences: Physics and Mathematics Jun 2002 p124
646: 599: 501: 460: 413: 382: 341: 305: 266: 240: 335:
Mankin was awarded their prize - cited to an Estonian Academy of Sciences journal.
112: 427:
To be honest, I'm not sure. At first glance the award doesn't seem that notable.
74: 66: 355:
We'd first need a reliable source to show that he actually recieved said award.
215: 567:. The award should be verified to be national or international award. 377:
on the Estonian Physical Society (EFS) site - and a description of the
517:
The standing of an award is judged by the standing of its recipients.
378: 445:, criterion #2 requires that we show that the EFS itself is notable. 598:
Are the refs above (and added to the article) sufficient for you? (
663:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
549:. GS cites are low in what is generally a well cited field. 260:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
482:
and also evidence that the award is highly prestigious.
108: 104: 100: 164: 412:
society's Annual Award is prestigious? Best wishes (
178: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 673:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 234:list of Science-related deletion discussions 283:in the absence of evidence that he passes 254: 228: 214:Non-notable even if all claims are true. 258:: This debate has been included in the 232:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 196:) 13:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 1: 655:20:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 623:09:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 608:08:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC) 527:21:46, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 510:12:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 492:10:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 469:16:14, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 455:16:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 437:15:50, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 422:14:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 407:13:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 391:11:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 365:10:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 350:10:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC) 61:07:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 588:04:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 559:04:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 314:02:17, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 297:00:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 275:20:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 249:20:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 224:20:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 206:13:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 690: 641:reports 44 articles and a 441:On closer examination of 666:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 637:: for what it is worth 500:clutching at straws! ( 375:list of award winners 373:OK? Here also is the 635:Comment: WoS h-index 325:It seems to me that 44:The result was 591: 574:comment added by 277: 263: 251: 237: 59: 681: 668: 590: 568: 264: 238: 183: 182: 168: 116: 98: 58: 56: 49: 34: 689: 688: 684: 683: 682: 680: 679: 678: 677: 671:deletion review 664: 569: 125: 89: 73: 70: 52: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 687: 685: 676: 675: 659: 658: 639:Web of Science 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 593: 592: 562: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 496: 495: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 457: 439: 409: 338: 337: 336: 332: 331: 318: 317: 299: 289:David Eppstein 278: 252: 226: 186: 185: 122: 69: 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 686: 674: 672: 667: 661: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 643:h-index of 11 640: 636: 633: 632: 624: 620: 616: 612: 611: 609: 605: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576:Behzad.Fatahi 573: 566: 563: 560: 556: 552: 548: 545: 544: 528: 524: 520: 516: 515: 514: 513: 511: 507: 503: 498: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 470: 466: 462: 458: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 423: 419: 415: 410: 408: 404: 400: 395: 394: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 354: 353: 351: 347: 343: 339: 334: 333: 329: 328: 327: 326: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 279: 276: 272: 268: 261: 257: 253: 250: 246: 242: 235: 231: 227: 225: 221: 217: 213: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 181: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 131: 128: 127:Find sources: 123: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 57: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 665: 662: 642: 638: 634: 570:— Preceding 564: 546: 301: 280: 255: 229: 211: 187: 175: 169: 161: 154: 148: 142: 136: 126: 53: 45: 43: 31: 28: 447:TimothyRias 429:TimothyRias 399:TimothyRias 369:Isn't this 357:TimothyRias 198:TimothyRias 190:TimothyRias 152:free images 75:Romi Mankin 67:Romi Mankin 615:Xxanthippe 551:Xxanthippe 519:Xxanthippe 484:Xxanthippe 54:Sandstein 267:• Gene93k 241:• Gene93k 584:contribs 572:unsigned 397:winners. 119:View log 647:Msrasnw 600:Msrasnw 565:Comment 502:Msrasnw 461:Msrasnw 443:WP:PROF 414:Msrasnw 383:Msrasnw 342:Msrasnw 306:Msrasnw 285:WP:PROF 158:WP refs 146:scholar 92:protect 87:history 547:Delete 281:Delete 212:Delete 130:Google 96:delete 46:delete 379:award 173:JSTOR 134:books 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 651:talk 619:talk 604:talk 580:talk 555:talk 523:talk 506:talk 488:talk 465:talk 451:talk 433:talk 418:talk 403:talk 387:talk 361:talk 346:talk 310:talk 302:Keep 293:talk 271:talk 256:Note 245:talk 230:Note 220:talk 216:EEng 202:talk 194:talk 166:FENS 140:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 381:! ( 287:. — 265:-- 239:-- 180:TWL 117:– ( 653:) 621:) 610:) 606:) 586:) 582:• 557:) 525:) 512:) 508:) 490:) 467:) 453:) 435:) 424:) 420:) 405:) 393:) 389:) 363:) 352:) 348:) 312:) 295:) 273:) 262:. 247:) 236:. 222:) 204:) 160:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 48:. 657:) 649:( 645:( 625:. 617:( 602:( 578:( 561:. 553:( 529:. 521:( 504:( 494:. 486:( 471:) 463:( 449:( 431:( 416:( 401:( 385:( 359:( 344:( 316:) 308:( 291:( 269:( 243:( 218:( 200:( 192:( 184:) 176:· 170:· 162:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 132:( 124:( 121:) 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Sandstein 
07:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Romi Mankin
Romi Mankin
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
TimothyRias
talk
TimothyRias
talk
13:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.