Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ronald Collé - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

147:
Most of his papers have citation counts in the single digits to mid-teens, which is very respectable but not evidence that he is more highly regarded than the average professor in his field; however a couple of his articles have very high citation counts (unless there is more than one R Colle in the
126:
Characterization as "spouse" was facetious action by nominator, choosing to list the one more likely to be considered non-notable first. We need to give scientists a fair shake with respect to Pokemon fictional characters, Bangladeshi cricketers, and Japanese actresses. It doesn't matter who
85:
With all due respect, Terence Ong, the fact as to whether or not "spouse" was marked was irrelevent. There are multiple papers published by R Colle over the internet, all having sources. Go look, eh? Laura Bush? Ahhh, yes, notable for murder,
250:
an article should write it in such a way that makes it clear why the subject should be in an article. Although sometimes people commenting on AfD do independent research to try and help problem articles, this is not a
127:
listed, numerous publications in professional journals evident from Google search even without bio removed as copyvio, plus editor of scientific journal,
17: 148:
field of physics). Also journal editor. There should be enough to allow somone to do a better job of explaining importance.
276: 36: 181:
I don't understand the question. Can you post the search url or explain more (on the article's talk page I guess).
275:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
259: 237: 228: 203: 185: 172: 152: 135: 118: 76: 56: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
165: 107: 223: 115: 100: 69: 168:? Google obviously gave a hit on a citation in an IEEE standard, but the website is a members site. 112: 104: 234: 54: 169: 132: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
256: 212: 200: 182: 149: 50: 62: 87: 73: 199:, appears to meet notability criteria for published work by significant margin. 96: 72:, appears to be non-notable. Son has been adding biographies of the family. 255:, it is a gift of our time and energy to the author and the project. 164:
Is there any way you can test for citation in standards published by
269:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
128: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 279:). No further edits should be made to this page. 233:Do not delete:This is true, do your research. -- 8: 95:, spouses are non-notable unless they are 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 211:Notable, but needs a lot of help. 24: 1: 44:The result of the debate was 296: 260:05:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 238:19:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC) 229:02:12, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 204:20:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 186:03:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC) 173:23:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 153:11:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 136:06:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 119:06:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 77:05:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC) 57:05:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 272:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 166:standards organizations 131:Journal of Research. 101:Hilary Rodham Clinton 70:K.A. Maroufi-Collé 287: 274: 226: 221: 218: 215: 110: 34: 295: 294: 290: 289: 288: 286: 285: 284: 283: 277:deletion review 270: 246:The person who 224: 219: 216: 213: 145:professor test. 108: 66: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 293: 291: 282: 281: 265: 264: 263: 262: 253:responsibility 241: 240: 231: 206: 193: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 176: 175: 156: 155: 138: 121: 90: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 292: 280: 278: 273: 267: 266: 261: 258: 254: 249: 245: 244: 243: 242: 239: 236: 232: 230: 227: 222: 210: 207: 205: 202: 198: 195: 194: 187: 184: 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 160: 159: 158: 157: 154: 151: 146: 142: 139: 137: 134: 130: 125: 122: 120: 117: 114: 111: 106: 102: 98: 94: 91: 89: 84: 81: 80: 79: 78: 75: 71: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 271: 268: 252: 247: 208: 196: 170:Gene Nygaard 161: 144: 140: 133:Gene Nygaard 123: 92: 82: 67: 63:Ronald Collé 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 257:Thatcher131 201:Monicasdude 183:Thatcher131 150:Thatcher131 68:Husband of 235:Hawkeye216 97:Laura Bush 51:Rebelguys2 141:Weak keep 88:Necrypsys 162:Question 143:per the 74:Fan1967 248:writes 93:Delete 116:e Ong 86:no?-- 16:< 209:Keep 197:Keep 129:NIST 124:Keep 103:. -- 83:Keep 48:. — 46:keep 105:Ter 99:or 113:nc 225:ε 220:e 217:o 214:M 109:e

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Rebelguys2

05:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Ronald Collé
K.A. Maroufi-Collé
Fan1967
05:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Necrypsys
Laura Bush
Hilary Rodham Clinton
Ter
e
nc
e Ong
06:28, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
NIST
Gene Nygaard
06:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Thatcher131
11:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
standards organizations
Gene Nygaard
23:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Thatcher131
03:17, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Monicasdude
20:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Moe

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.