224:
Attorney with no evidence of notability. When I tried to prod this article, I found out that it had been deleted four years ago in a discussion tainted by both sides. Although this incarnation fails to address the concerns expressed in the first AfD, IMO 4 years is too long for a G4 speedy.
248:. She runs a big operation, and there must be an article there that has more than just 'controversies.' Moreover, and I am not sure this was addressed appropriately in the first AfD, she is smoking hot (I'm not a spring chicken anymore), and I think
193:
62:), which I took care of inserting into the article. Seriously, though, when we're dealing with a prolific mass-producer of press releases like this, finding reliable sources is like finding a needle in a haystack.
329:
In addition to the lawsuits against her, the Forbes blog point out that she is notable because "Deutch gets a fair amount of free air time as a “tax expert” on such networks as Time Warner’s CNN and GE’s NBC."
94:
375:
187:
148:
299:
Yes, but there are also plenty of good sources there. The way I see it, a company that big and visible, and gets sued for so much money, is pretty much notable already.
276:. Perhaps there is a source out there which supports the assertion of notability in the article. No recommendation either way at the moment, pending further research. --
89:
153:
327:
349:
245:
121:
116:
125:
390:
364:
339:
308:
294:
264:
235:
108:
73:
59:
208:
17:
175:
320:. Much as I hate BLPs based mostly on negative notoriety, she is getting some widespread and mainstream coverage: LA Times,
324:
286:
169:
406:
36:
405:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
165:
321:
335:
215:
112:
53:
201:
272:: some of the Google News results are press-releases or material of a similar sort which are not
386:
360:
181:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
304:
260:
249:
104:
79:
49:
283:
63:
382:
356:
273:
142:
300:
256:
278:
244:. Sorry Blanchard. I think she is plenty notable, given for instance
399:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
In case you're wondering, yes, my wife thinks I'm a total moron.
138:
134:
130:
95:
Articles for deletion/Roni Lynn Deutch (2nd nomination)
200:
376:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
409:). No further edits should be made to this page.
214:
8:
370:
344:
374:: This debate has been included in the
350:list of Law-related deletion discussions
348:: This debate has been included in the
87:
90:Articles for deletion/Roni Lynn Deutch
7:
86:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
391:19:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
365:19:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
340:19:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
309:17:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
295:17:45, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
265:17:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
236:16:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
74:00:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
426:
48:per the sources found by
402:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
85:AfDs for this article:
246:these search results
46:Nomination withdrawn
281:
64:Non-admin closing.
44:The result was
393:
379:
367:
353:
279:
255:
417:
404:
380:
354:
293:
274:reliable sources
253:
233:
219:
218:
204:
156:
146:
128:
105:Roni Lynn Deutch
80:Roni Lynn Deutch
71:
34:
425:
424:
420:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
413:
407:deletion review
400:
291:
277:
229:
161:
152:
119:
103:
100:
83:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
423:
421:
412:
411:
395:
394:
368:
342:
326:Forbes (blog).
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
287:
222:
221:
158:
154:AfD statistics
99:
98:
97:
92:
84:
82:
77:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
422:
410:
408:
403:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
377:
373:
369:
366:
362:
358:
351:
347:
343:
341:
337:
333:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
292:
290:
284:
282:
275:
271:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
251:
247:
243:
240:
239:
238:
237:
232:
228:
217:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
167:
164:
163:Find sources:
159:
155:
150:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
96:
93:
91:
88:
81:
78:
76:
75:
70:
65:
61:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
401:
398:
371:
345:
317:
288:
269:
241:
230:
226:
223:
211:
205:
197:
190:
184:
178:
172:
162:
68:
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
332:First Light
188:free images
50:First Light
231:Blanchardb
69:Blanchardb
383:• Gene93k
357:• Gene93k
252:applies.
250:WP:HOTTIE
234:-- timed
72:-- timed
149:View log
60:contribs
270:Comment
227:Delete.
194:WPÂ refs
182:scholar
122:protect
117:history
301:Drmies
257:Drmies
166:Google
126:delete
323:Time,
209:JSTOR
170:books
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
387:talk
372:Note
361:talk
346:Note
336:talk
318:Keep
305:talk
280:Kinu
261:talk
242:Keep
202:FENS
176:news
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
54:talk
381:--
355:--
216:TWL
151:•
147:– (
389:)
378:.
363:)
352:.
338:)
307:)
263:)
196:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
66:--
385:(
359:(
334:(
303:(
289:c
285:/
259:(
220:)
212:·
206:·
198:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
168:(
160:(
157:)
145:)
107:(
57:·
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.