577:. I look at this every week and think, "We really shouldn't be legitimizing this man's fantasy world" but never make a statement because his attempts to create an air of legitimacy about this have been fairly successful. Who knows, one day Ecuador may have astronauts but right now I don't think he qualifies as notable by being a professional astronaut. If he were a professional astronaut the evidence wouldn't be so iffy. I know that's circular reasoning but generally it isn't necessary to argue about whether or not someone is an astronaut. In this case the need for argument is itself a factor in the argument.
259:
349:
A Latin
American astronaut is a notable person. The fact that he does not fly is not a criteria for no-notability. Non Scientific editors should not be allowed to comment here. Otherwise they woud know that, for example, chicken are birds but do not fly. Would you say that a chicken is not a bird
262:, most of it in Spanish. I don't deny that it sounds really made-up, especially the space agency that he founded, but it appears that he is the first person from Ecuador to have done it, even if it wasn't a research trip, but a commercial trip. There's also a trivial mention on
267:
301:
Ok, I read through a lot of links, he's referred to as astronaut, and part of the Soyuz (Factiva article preview), but on checking the Soyuz crew from TMA-8 to TMA-15, he isn't listed. I don't know what to make of this, it's just too absurd!
374:
He flies ! On eguadorian jets, he even mesures microgravity and UV index. This is not notable enough? He has created a Space Agency, by himself. Do you know many people who own a space agency? Not notable enough? What elese do you
706:
has a very important sounding name, but... does it exist outside of Nader? I see no evidence that it's more than a one man organization. Perhaps making Nader redirect there? Or vice versa? -
230:- Could you clarify in which way he is an astronaut ? I don't see any reason why he would qualify as such. As said previously, I think this article is exactly the same story as the now deleted
625:
Can you prove that he's done more than dress up, start a website and strut around? In my mind, the current question is "It's bullshit, but does it rise to the level of notable bullshit?" -
164:
118:
234:
article - self proclamed astronaut who has no other proof of his status than his own words and the articles based on them. This guy is just another Rick Hobson.
644:"Nader is set to fly as mission specialist for the first three manned space missions of the Ecuadorian Civilian Space Program." Come on, this is insane.
209:
If the event is significant, and/or if the individual's role within it is substantial, a separate article for the person may be appropriate.
608:
595:
357:
284:
He has flown in zero-g on board an airplane. So did I during an ESA sponsored flight for students. Should I get my entry in wikipedia ?
616:
418:
687:
662:
17:
414:
395:
703:
683:
439:
85:
80:
89:
72:
666:
143:
per nom. Vanity article of a non-notable subject with most references coming from the author's own website and writings.
255:
728:
36:
435:
231:
727:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
503:
by me. Claims to be a scientist (listed as "Ecuadorian
Scientist") without providing proper references, etc. --
361:
307:
275:
218:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
612:
599:
263:
522:
410:
391:
383:
353:
691:
649:
211:. In this case, he is the first astronaut from Ecuador and qualifies per the John Hinckley, Jr. standard.
715:
695:
674:
653:
634:
603:
586:
562:
534:
512:
483:
464:
455:
I admit there's something weird and vaguely half assed about the whole thing, but notable is notable. -
443:
399:
365:
341:
311:
293:
279:
243:
222:
194:
190:
176:
152:
134:
54:
500:
496:
327:- Unverified claims to notability. If he were significant, there would be more sources discussing him.
76:
406:
387:
582:
557:
508:
336:
172:
303:
271:
214:
68:
60:
711:
630:
479:
460:
645:
530:
148:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
289:
239:
186:
130:
686:
and unless that cite is proven false, I think the first
Ecuadorian astronaut is notable.
578:
549:
504:
328:
168:
204:
707:
626:
475:
456:
125:
Vanity article by non notable person who is trying to be considered as "astronaut".
526:
144:
49:
106:
285:
235:
126:
543:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
474:. The more I poke around, the more my bullshit meter moves to the right. -
429:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
185:: Needs better sources, but the guy seems notable if the text is true.
721:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
350:
because there are no independant sources saying that they fly?
266:
of his 'first astronaut from
Ecuador' status, and an article in
113:
102:
98:
94:
594:
The first
Ecuadorian astronaut is certainly notable.
434:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \
165:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
731:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:Vanity article, please see lengthy discussion
8:
521:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing
548:Please add new comments below this notice.
163:: This debate has been included in the
258:on Factiva, and there's coverage like
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
203:The article actually qualifies the
24:
704:Ecuadorian Civilian Space Agency
684:Ecuadorian Civilian Space Agency
673:, his otters and a clue-bat •
379:Maybe some sense og humour..
1:
748:
232:International Space Agency
716:15:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
696:03:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
675:18:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
665:but most are in Spanish.
654:15:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
635:18:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
604:17:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
587:16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
563:15:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
535:12:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
513:03:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
484:19:13, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
465:04:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
55:04:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
724:Please do not modify it.
444:11:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
400:22:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
366:22:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
342:17:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
312:18:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
294:17:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
280:15:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
244:10:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
223:09:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
195:03:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
177:00:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
153:12:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
135:11:36, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
436:Backslash Forwardslash
617:few or no other edits
525:). It is listed now.
419:few or no other edits
207:exception criteria -
619:outside this topic.
421:outside this topic.
669:seems substantial.
682:. He's listed on
501:detailed criticism
44:The result was
620:
565:
497:Talk:Ronnie_Nader
446:
422:
403:
386:comment added by
356:comment added by
179:
53:
739:
726:
672:
671:Ten Pound Hammer
606:
560:
555:
547:
545:
433:
431:
404:
402:
380:
368:
339:
334:
159:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
747:
746:
742:
741:
740:
738:
737:
736:
735:
729:deletion review
722:
670:
558:
550:
541:
427:
381:
351:
337:
329:
213:Updated below -
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
745:
743:
734:
733:
718:
699:
698:
677:
656:
638:
637:
622:
621:
609:173.96.182.183
596:173.96.182.183
589:
567:
566:
546:
539:
538:
537:
516:
515:
489:
488:
487:
486:
448:
447:
432:
424:
377:
376:
369:
358:193.227.170.13
344:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
264:Children's BBC
260:on El Universo
249:
248:
247:
246:
197:
180:
156:
155:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
744:
732:
730:
725:
719:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
678:
676:
668:
664:
660:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
623:
618:
614:
610:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
568:
564:
561:
556:
553:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
518:
517:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
491:
490:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:Switching to
469:
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
430:
426:
425:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
373:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
348:
345:
343:
340:
335:
332:
326:
323:
322:
313:
309:
305:
304:SpacemanSpiff
300:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
272:SpacemanSpiff
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
215:SpacemanSpiff
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:
154:
150:
146:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
132:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
723:
720:
688:69.253.207.9
679:
663:some sources
658:
646:Nick mallory
641:
591:
574:
570:
551:
542:
492:
471:
452:
451:
428:
378:
371:
346:
330:
324:
298:
227:
208:
200:
199:
182:
160:
140:
124:
69:Ronnie Nader
61:Ronnie Nader
45:
43:
31:
28:
615:) has made
417:) has made
407:Astragramma
388:Astragramma
382:—Preceding
352:—Preceding
347:Strong Keep
187:Niteshift36
661:There are
579:Drawn Some
505:Hilbert137
169:Erwin85Bot
659:Weak keep
268:BBC World
183:Weak Keep
708:Richfife
667:This one
627:Richfife
476:Richfife
457:Richfife
415:contribs
396:contribs
384:unsigned
354:unsigned
254:I found
119:View log
527:DumbBOT
499:, e.g.
472:Neutral
228:Comment
145:Rillian
86:protect
81:history
642:Delete
575:Userfy
571:Delete
523:step 3
493:Delete
325:Delete
299:Delete
286:Hektor
236:Hektor
141:Delete
127:Hektor
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
559:vecia
375:need?
338:vecia
205:WP:1E
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
712:talk
702:The
692:talk
680:Keep
650:talk
631:talk
613:talk
600:talk
592:Keep
583:talk
554:enna
531:talk
509:talk
480:talk
461:talk
453:Keep
440:talk
411:talk
392:talk
372:Keep
362:talk
333:enna
308:talk
290:talk
276:talk
256:this
240:talk
219:talk
201:Keep
191:talk
173:talk
167:. --
161:Note
149:talk
131:talk
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
573:or
438:/ {
270:. -
714:)
694:)
652:)
633:)
607:—
602:)
585:)
533:)
511:)
482:)
463:)
442:}
413:•
405:—
398:)
394:•
364:)
310:)
292:)
278:)
242:)
221:)
193:)
175:)
151:)
133:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
50:BJ
48:.
710:(
690:(
648:(
629:(
611:(
598:(
581:(
552:Ů„
529:(
507:(
478:(
459:(
409:(
390:(
360:(
331:Ů„
306:(
302:-
288:(
274:(
238:(
217:(
189:(
171:(
147:(
129:(
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.