269:. she has almost an appearance every 2 episodes, maybe more. but she is still a secondary character, whose story and personality can be easily covered in the original article. also "totally notable" is kind of weird. making a search for "rose" "two and a half men" will probably give you many results, but she is still a secondary character. "judith" "two and a half men" would too, but there's no way judith should have her own article.--
246:
359:
Has sufficient sourcing for an independent article. Merger is an editorial decision, and would probably make sense in this case, but there's no policy-based reason to delete this article rather than merging.
401:
get deleted, it would simply be recreated within a couple months. The article could use more sourcing, but what's there establishes the key "keep" reasons. On a closing note, I'll say that I do "
189:
217:
125:
282:
Notability is determined by sources, not by how large a role the character plays in the series. The main characters for a lot of less famous series can't pass
92:
87:
96:
79:
465:
295:
257:
158:
461:
429:
50 episodes it says in the information box. That makes the character notable, having been featured in 50 episodes, of a notable show.
17:
389:
the bottom line here. Although it's frowned upon, I could also mention some cartoon characters that have their own articles (
83:
49:
493:
469:
452:
421:
369:
343:
316:
299:
273:
261:
234:
206:
178:
162:
141:
61:
390:
339:
article makes it very obvious that all the information for the character can be contained within the original article.--
335:
and please, compare the info on the main article and the one on this one... it makes no sense to have this article. the
48:. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. The issue of merging can be discussed on the article's talk page (
508:
36:
291:
253:
154:
405:" being able to keep an eye on Rose. (those familiar with the character might see a touch of irony in that ;)) —
75:
67:
507:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
232:
204:
174:. not a lead in the series. not notable on her own. already enough information in the original article.--
287:
249:
150:
57:
312:
but like i said, looking for sources (on google, for example) could, in this case, be very confusing.--
132:
no indication of why this character needs a separate article to what is already in the main article.
414:
402:
478:
365:
336:
171:
225:
197:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
394:
283:
430:
53:
460:
standard fictional character entry that is verifiable and notable, too big t be merged. --
409:
378:
382:
477:, this actually seems to be a main character rather than just a recurring character.
361:
149:
This is a character that has appered a lot in the sitcom and those have a good story.
137:
113:
397:
has been headed over the last half-year, and I'd say there's a fair chance if it
340:
313:
270:
175:
133:
501:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
286:, and sometimes characters who appear just once can. -
190:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
511:). No further edits should be made to this page.
218:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
377:Yea, Jclemens pretty much nails it. Enough
248:I added a couple refs to get it started. -
212:
184:
216:: This debate has been included in the
188:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
393:). Add to that the direction that
24:
462:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
528:
381:to show that character is
62:00:05, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
494:19:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
470:19:26, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
453:23:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
422:18:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
370:04:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
344:18:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
317:18:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
300:16:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
274:13:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
262:01:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
235:01:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
207:01:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
179:01:08, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
163:21:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
142:00:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
76:Rose (Two and a Half men)
68:Rose (Two and a Half men)
504:Please do not modify it.
245:- She's totally notable.
32:Please do not modify it.
391:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
337:Two and a Half Men
172:Two and a Half Men
44:The result was
420:
237:
221:
209:
193:
50:non-admin closure
519:
506:
490:
484:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
419:
417:
406:
288:Peregrine Fisher
250:Peregrine Fisher
228:
222:
200:
194:
151:Pedro thy master
123:
117:
99:
34:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
515:
509:deletion review
502:
488:
482:
447:
444:
441:
438:
435:
432:
415:
407:
226:
198:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
525:
523:
514:
513:
497:
496:
472:
455:
424:
372:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
305:
304:
303:
302:
277:
276:
239:
238:
210:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
524:
512:
510:
505:
499:
498:
495:
492:
491:
485:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
450:
428:
425:
423:
418:
412:
411:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:- and really
384:
380:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
358:
355:
354:
345:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
318:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
272:
268:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
241:
240:
236:
233:
230:
229:
219:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
201:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
503:
500:
486:
480:
474:
457:
431:
426:
408:
398:
386:
374:
356:
266:
242:
227:Juliancolton
224:
213:
199:Juliancolton
196:
185:
167:
166:
146:
145:
131:
45:
43:
31:
28:
54:Ron Ritzman
362:Jclemens
296:contribs
258:contribs
170:back to
159:contribs
126:View log
395:WP:FICT
284:WP:NOTE
267:Comment
93:protect
88:history
387:that's
121:delete
97:delete
448:Focus
379:WP:RS
168:Merge
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
481:Banj
475:Keep
466:talk
458:Keep
427:Keep
410:Ched
403:like
383:WP:N
375:Keep
366:talk
357:Keep
341:camr
314:camr
292:talk
271:camr
254:talk
243:Keep
223:-- –
214:Note
195:-- –
186:Note
176:camr
155:talk
147:Keep
138:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
479:--
399:did
294:) (
256:) (
134:noq
489:oi
468:)
416:?
413::
368:)
298:)
260:)
231:|
220:.
203:|
192:.
161:)
157:•
140:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
487:b
483:e
464:(
445:m
442:a
439:e
436:r
433:D
364:(
290:(
252:(
153:(
136:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.