394:. I was working on a possible "Ratchet culture" article recently (which is a spinout from the colloquial use of "ratchet" that blew up with the Miley Cyrus twerking bullshit)—and I honestly don't know why the sheer amount of currently sourced RS aren't enough to show significant coverage here (and if it's not enough, then you'd love
348:; all describing it as a new sub-genre of rap. But nothing very significant. Also, I don't find anything peculiar about it that differentiates it from rap music. Maybe we can have it in the future if it becomes more prominent.
165:
311:
Dan56 has pretty much nailed the problem. I spent a lot of time looking for reliable and detailed coverage, but so far nothing. It might appear some day, but there is not sufficient coverage at this time for it to pass
236:. I agree with Koala, all of the sources in the article site DJ Mustard describing his music as "ratchet" (and no one else). There is no explicit statement that "ratchet" is a real music genre, just a
257:
Agree with the two above. This is not a professionally recognized genre or subgenre that would be used to describe music in writing unless it had quotes around it. The subject fails
402:
into account, if those sources aren't good enough to show the notability of this (perhaps forced) "subgenre", at least we can salvage parts of the text for the DJ Mustard article.
370:
159:
395:
118:
213:
340:
343:
125:
91:
86:
95:
78:
180:
147:
17:
141:
430:
40:
137:
411:
382:
361:
331:
303:
278:
262:
249:
225:
205:
60:
187:
82:
346:
74:
66:
378:
426:
271:
36:
153:
354:
173:
295:
237:
374:
326:
221:
201:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
313:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
267:
245:
258:
350:
299:
290:, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is
399:
319:
217:
197:
112:
369:
due to lack of significant coverage from reliable third-party sources. I've also
286:
Does not meet notability guideline: "'Significant coverage' addresses the topic
241:
391:
53:
405:
419:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
294:
but it need not be the main topic of the source material".
108:
104:
100:
172:
186:
196:Not a notable or real music genre. Only a phrase.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
433:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
214:list of Music-related deletion discussions
211:
240:mentioning the word in various contexts.
261:. Also someone make sure to nominate
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
396:this fictional character discussion
371:nominated the category for deletion
24:
263:Category:Ratchet (music genre)
1:
398:)—but, taking the spirit of
292:more than a passing mention
450:
422:Please do not modify it.
412:23:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
383:08:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
362:17:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
332:12:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
304:01:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
279:19:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
250:17:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
226:16:21, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
206:04:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
61:02:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
288:directly and in detail
75:Ratchet (music genre)
67:Ratchet (music genre)
238:synthesis of sources
48:The result was
358:
276:
228:
59:
441:
424:
410:
408:
359:
356:
353:
330:
322:
274:
270:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
58:
56:
34:
449:
448:
444:
443:
442:
440:
439:
438:
437:
431:deletion review
420:
406:
403:
355:
349:
320:
317:
272:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
447:
445:
436:
435:
415:
414:
385:
364:
334:
306:
281:
252:
230:
229:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
446:
434:
432:
428:
423:
417:
416:
413:
409:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
360:
352:
347:
344:
341:
339:I found this
338:
335:
333:
328:
324:
323:
315:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
269:
264:
260:
256:
253:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
421:
418:
387:
375:XXSNUGGUMSXX
366:
336:
318:
308:
291:
287:
283:
266:
254:
233:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
49:
47:
31:
28:
273:message me!
160:free images
392:DJ Mustard
427:talk page
218:• Gene93k
37:talk page
429:or in a
119:View log
39:or in a
357:(talk)
321:SabreBD
314:WP:NOTE
198:Koala15
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
367:Delete
337:Delete
309:Delete
284:Delete
268:STATic
259:WP:GNG
255:Delete
242:2Flows
234:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
404:czar
388:Merge
351:Harsh
296:Dan56
265:too.
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
55:slakr
16:<
400:WP:N
379:talk
345:and
327:talk
300:talk
246:talk
222:talk
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
390:to
316:.--
188:TWL
117:– (
381:)
373:.
342:,
302:)
248:)
224:)
216:.
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
407:♔
377:(
329:)
325:(
298:(
244:(
220:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.