493:, how about we let this and others like it get redirected. I doubt you will get a consensus to keep these without showing some significant sources anyway. A redirect would preseve the history and if (inexpensive) sources do turn up in the future it will be easy enough to reverse the redirect and add the sources. Forcing all of these to come to AfD just wastes time and risks the articles getting deleted altogether, with little chance of a keep. If you want to reverse the redirect and add sources, I don't think anyone will have a problem with that but until then there is little point arguing over them.
507:
Great, Alex, but if you don't actually have a newspapers.com subscription, could I ask exactly where you got these links you claim exist are from, and how you managed to review them to ensure they're good cites? Because if you can't actually get at them, I've got to question whether they exist at
457:
Guidelines are indeed guidelines, and they're not set in stone. And in order to set them aside, we need to see some frigging seriously compelling arguments. "His body of work and accomplishments make him notable" isn't one. For all you claim that you've got "plenty" from newspapers.com, Alex, I
381:
Guidelines are just guidelines, notability isn't concrete or set in stone. Plus, have you considered actually looking up sources (which, I imagine, you rarely do)? I'm finding plenty just on the abstracts from sites like newspapers.com.
299:
Now that the precedent has been established you really should just redirect the articles instead of bringing them to AFD if there are other similar ones out there. If someone objects then you can bring it here.
176:
276:
216:
236:
424:
You are incorrect. I do not feel any obligation to further defend and/or explain my methods of checking for sources to you, especially since you aren't going to listen anyway.
256:
129:
170:
212:
543:
208:
51:
563:
or redirect if you want. The newspapers.com sources are all very much routine coverage. Only a handful of sources noted him beyond one sentence.
136:
17:
102:
97:
106:
191:
89:
410:
Judging by your past AfDs, what you consider "checking for sources" is just looking at the first page of Google returns.
158:
592:
40:
429:
401:
372:
340:
284:
264:
244:
224:
480:
415:
387:
358:
322:
67:
152:
425:
397:
368:
336:
280:
260:
240:
220:
148:
588:
573:
555:
532:
516:
502:
484:
470:
433:
419:
405:
391:
376:
362:
344:
326:
309:
288:
268:
248:
228:
71:
36:
476:
411:
383:
354:
318:
305:
63:
459:
198:
353:
How many people have been All-Americans twice and won a
College World Series Most Valuable Player?
184:
546:. If signifciant sources turn up the redirect can always be reversed and the new material added.
551:
528:
498:
93:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
587:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
335:
And this is why I don't simply redirect these. Alex, could you be a little more specific?
301:
164:
564:
547:
524:
523:
Why delete and not redirect when there is a perfectly appropriate redirect target?
494:
85:
77:
123:
207:
Non-notable individual, fails GNG and BASE/N. I would be okay with a redirect to
396:
How would you know whether or not I look up sources? Do you work for the NSA?
367:
Does that make him notable by any standard other than your personal opinion?
475:
Behind a $ 79 a year
Newspapers.com subscription that I'm not going to pay.
581:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
490:
277:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
317:
His body of work and accomplishments make him notable.
119:
115:
111:
183:
197:
237:list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
595:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:from a small local paper. Where are the rest?
257:list of Baseball-related deletion discussions
8:
544:College World Series Most Outstanding Player
275:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:Note: This debate has been included in the
209:College World Series Most Outstanding Player
52:College World Series Most Outstanding Player
274:
254:
234:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
458:see you posted just one link,
211:per the precedent established
1:
612:
584:Please do not modify it.
574:15:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
556:21:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
533:21:35, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
517:18:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
503:21:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
485:20:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
471:17:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
434:04:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
420:23:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
406:18:39, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
392:18:36, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
377:18:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
363:18:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
345:18:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
327:18:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
310:15:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
289:15:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
269:14:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
249:14:59, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
229:14:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
72:00:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
460:routine sports coverage
426:Mellowed Fillmore
398:Mellowed Fillmore
369:Mellowed Fillmore
337:Mellowed Fillmore
291:
281:Mellowed Fillmore
271:
261:Mellowed Fillmore
251:
241:Mellowed Fillmore
221:Mellowed Fillmore
62:
59:non-admin closure
603:
586:
571:
514:
468:
202:
201:
187:
139:
127:
109:
56:
34:
611:
610:
606:
605:
604:
602:
601:
600:
599:
593:deletion review
582:
565:
510:
491:Alexsautographs
464:
144:
135:
100:
84:
81:
64:Spirit of Eagle
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
609:
607:
598:
597:
577:
576:
558:
537:
536:
535:
521:
520:
519:
505:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
348:
347:
330:
329:
312:
293:
292:
272:
252:
205:
204:
141:
80:
75:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
608:
596:
594:
590:
585:
579:
578:
575:
572:
570:
569:
562:
559:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
515:
513:
506:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
469:
467:
461:
456:
453:
452:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
298:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
138:
134:
131:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
104:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:
79:
76:
74:
73:
69:
65:
60:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
583:
580:
567:
566:
560:
539:
511:
509:
465:
463:
454:
314:
296:
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
132:
86:Ray VanCleef
78:Ray VanCleef
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
171:free images
302:Spanneraol
589:talk page
568:Wizardman
512:Nha Trang
466:Nha Trang
297:Redirect.
37:talk page
591:or in a
540:Redirect
130:View log
39:or in a
548:Rlendog
525:Rlendog
495:Rlendog
455:Delete:
177:WP refs
165:scholar
103:protect
98:history
561:Delete
149:Google
107:delete
508:all.
192:JSTOR
153:books
137:Stats
124:views
116:watch
112:links
16:<
552:talk
529:talk
499:talk
481:talk
477:Alex
430:talk
416:talk
412:Alex
402:talk
388:talk
384:Alex
373:talk
359:talk
355:Alex
341:talk
323:talk
319:Alex
315:Keep
306:talk
285:talk
265:talk
245:talk
225:talk
217:here
215:and
213:here
185:FENS
159:news
120:logs
94:talk
90:edit
68:talk
542:to
489:So
199:TWL
128:– (
55:.
554:)
531:)
501:)
483:)
432:)
418:)
404:)
390:)
375:)
361:)
343:)
325:)
308:)
287:)
279:.
267:)
259:.
247:)
239:.
227:)
219:.
179:)
122:|
118:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
70:)
550:(
527:(
497:(
479:(
428:(
414:(
400:(
386:(
371:(
357:(
339:(
321:(
304:(
283:(
263:(
243:(
223:(
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
133:·
126:)
88:(
66:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.