239:
and allow continued work. While the original article was indeed an unsourced stub ( I can suppose the author never heard of working in userspace), a news search finds the film being discussed in depth and detail in multiple reliable
158:
332:. The film appears to be culturally significant as part of an overall educational reform movement. Clearly it needs improvements but its continuing touring status makes it worthy of a decent source of reference.
119:
152:
241:
213:
311:. The article now has several citations of reviews in reliable sources. Indeed I consulted this article after seeing the film referenced in
189:
Contested PROD. The contester's rationale was good enough so I have undeleted the article and placed it on AfD instead. No vote from me.
92:
87:
96:
17:
79:
173:
140:
356:
36:
299:
264:
134:
355:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
341:
337:
324:
303:
286:
267:
228:
205:
130:
61:
281:
248:
295:
180:
257:
83:
166:
333:
320:
276:
224:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
146:
54:
252:
75:
67:
244:
316:
202:
220:
113:
49:
190:
294:; seems notable enough and is referenced in many external sources.
349:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
255:
encourages that it be improved to meet that potential.
109:
105:
101:
165:
179:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
359:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:per significant coverage in reliable sources.--
8:
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
211:
214:list of Film-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
243:thus meeting the criteria at
376:
342:18:02, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
325:08:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
304:06:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
287:17:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
268:07:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
229:02:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
206:19:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
62:14:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
352:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
247:. It definitely has
44:The result was
231:
217:
58:
367:
354:
296:InverseHypercube
284:
279:
260:
218:
199:
196:
193:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
59:
56:
52:
34:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
363:
357:deletion review
350:
282:
277:
258:
197:
194:
191:
126:
90:
76:Race to Nowhere
74:
71:
68:Race to Nowhere
55:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
373:
371:
362:
361:
345:
344:
327:
306:
289:
270:
233:
232:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
372:
360:
358:
353:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
334:MariaMitchell
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
288:
285:
280:
274:
271:
269:
266:
265:
262:
261:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
351:
348:
329:
312:
308:
291:
272:
263:
256:
249:WP:POTENTIAL
236:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
153:free images
221:• Gene93k
317:Easchiff
259:Schmidt,
120:View log
278:Beloved
240:sources
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
253:WP:ATD
251:, and
131:Google
97:delete
313:Slate
283:Freak
245:WP:NF
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
338:talk
330:Keep
321:talk
309:Keep
300:talk
292:Keep
273:Keep
237:Keep
225:talk
203:Talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
46:keep
219:--
181:TWL
118:– (
57:Dom
51:Big
340:)
323:)
315:.
302:)
227:)
216:.
201:|
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
336:(
319:(
298:(
223:(
198:P
195:I
192:J
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.