393:. those arguing for keep so far seem to have misunderstood the rationale given for deletion. That the band exists is obvious, but it is not notable, and is unsourced so is also unverifiable. the only argument against that is to find reliable third party sources that have non-trivial coverage. as none can be found, this article fails poicy and must be deleted. If they get famous later, then sources will appear and the article can be re-written.
263:
I would want to keep the
Article - There is enough proof that the band exists but not enough to show that the band is popular. The band is 6 months old and had recently come to fame after being in a Bollywood hit film - Rock On!! But, I would still want the article to be kept. Whats the point of
331:
I completely agree with Cunard. The band is an upcoming band with potential to revolutionize the indian music, but atleast for now the band is not famous enough to have an article in
Knowledge. The article can be an exception case but it all depends on the Admin. We still have 3 days to give a
354:
The band's page in Orkut has around 150 fans, which shows the popularity of the band... Will RADIO's page with 150 fans help?, And Cunard, whats with your userpage? It says that "Cunard is a douche", you should fix
415:: I too think that the page should be deleted as the band is not famous. The page will be made later after the band is famous enough to have a page in Knowledge, well 2 days left before deletion...
238:
123:
312:? The links you gave such as the Yahoo! Answers and YouTube are unreliable. Soundclick.com isn't a third-party source because it appears to be written by the band itself.
134:. I did some searching on Google for sources for this band but couldn't find any. If anyone can any reliable sources for this article, I'll withdraw this deletion nom.
152:
The Band is still not too popular as it is a newly formed band... and it would be hard to find it in google because of the band's name "Radio" which is very common...
264:
deleting the article when the page is going to be made again in a few months when RADIO would be a sensation. But, here is their
Soundclick page, i guess -
380:
90:
85:
175:
94:
17:
77:
376:
305:
439:
36:
438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
424:
402:
383:
364:
341:
321:
295:
276:
256:
251:
228:
204:
179:
143:
59:
81:
265:
360:
291:
272:
163:
217:
193:
420:
337:
224:
200:
171:
73:
65:
313:
135:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
283:
398:
317:
245:
139:
356:
287:
268:
416:
333:
309:
220:
196:
167:
55:
131:
111:
394:
157:
50:
308:. I'm sure that the band Radio exists, but the question is: are they a
304:
The problem with the sources you provided about is that they are not
266:
http://www.soundclick.com/members/default.cfm?member=radioreligion
218:
http://www.imeem.com/bhaskarswaroop/music/lWTQfgpk/radio_musafir/
194:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080910215034AADmTvo
432:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
189:
Here is a question asked in Yahoo
Answers! on this band...
332:
newspaper link or something, but no user uploaded stuff.
284:
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=871828
239:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
118:
107:
103:
99:
160:
If you want more sources, i will try to find them...
130:
Non-notable band founded in 2007. Article contains no
286:, now the deletion of the page would be injustified
282:Ok, here is the proof of the Radio being a band -
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
442:). No further edits should be made to this page.
374::Contains no references to assert notability. --
8:
158:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-eldX9SRzo
237:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
156:But here is a video of them ...
216:Here is their song on Imeem...
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
425:23:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
403:13:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
384:13:27, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
365:23:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
342:04:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
322:04:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
296:04:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
277:04:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
257:18:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
229:23:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
205:23:43, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
180:23:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
144:22:51, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
60:22:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
459:
435:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
377:KnowledgeHegemony
259:
242:
166:comment added by
450:
437:
306:reliable sources
254:
248:
243:
233:
182:
132:reliable sources
121:
115:
97:
34:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:deletion review
433:
252:
246:
161:
117:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
445:
444:
428:
427:
408:
406:
405:
387:
386:
368:
367:
347:
345:
344:
325:
324:
281:
261:
260:
231:
209:
191:
190:
154:
153:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
443:
441:
436:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
410:
409:
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:strong delete
389:
388:
385:
382:
379:
378:
373:
372:Strong Delete
370:
369:
366:
362:
358:
353:
350:
349:
348:
343:
339:
335:
330:
327:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
279:
278:
274:
270:
267:
258:
255:
249:
240:
236:
232:
230:
226:
222:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
207:
206:
202:
198:
195:
188:
185:
184:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
159:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
431:
412:
407:
390:
375:
371:
351:
346:
328:
310:notable band
301:
280:
262:
234:
213:
208:
192:
186:
155:
149:
129:
74:Radio (Band)
66:Radio (Band)
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
247:Fabrictramp
162:—Preceding
357:Nawal.1991
288:Nawal.1991
269:Nawal.1991
253:talk to me
417:Bhaskar20
334:Bhaskar20
221:Bhaskar20
197:Bhaskar20
168:Bhaskar20
352:Comment:
329:Comment:
302:Comment:
214:Comment:
187:Comment:
176:contribs
164:unsigned
150:Comment:
124:View log
355:that...
91:protect
86:history
413:delete
395:Yobmod
314:Cunard
136:Cunard
119:delete
95:delete
46:delete
381:Part2
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
421:talk
399:talk
361:talk
338:talk
318:talk
292:talk
273:talk
235:Note
225:talk
201:talk
172:talk
140:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
244:--
241:.
423:)
401:)
363:)
340:)
320:)
294:)
275:)
250:|
227:)
203:)
178:)
174:•
142:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
419:(
397:(
359:(
336:(
316:(
290:(
271:(
223:(
199:(
170:(
138:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.