Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Radical Islam in Australia - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

445:. Much of the content of the article is material which was rejected or disputed in the Islam in Australia article, and an obvious problem with this article is that there's no clear definition of what 'radical Islam' is, with many of the sources being claims in the tabloid media rather than sober analysis by actual experts on this topic. I just removed several claims which were cited to opinion articles by conservative columnists who are in no ways experts on the topic, as well as some claims about the views of a living person which weren't supported by the citation given: this was a clear violation of the core policy 749:
Muslims. As per fork concerns, if anything, we should move all the tangential bits and pieces in Islam in Australia "Chronology" section on radical Muslim clerics to this page, replace all those bits and pieces with a single paragraph (titled "concerns over radicalism" or whatever) with a ||main|| redirect to this page. That way we can clean up the main Aussie Islam page from all those side bits.
31: 748:
is this a case of WP:Idontlikeit? All the information is sourced from reliable news sources touching on a topic of concern to the Australian public. The photo of an Australian committing war raised concerns and awareness of growing radicalism and/or sympathy towards radicalism amongst some Australian
379:
involving Iraqis and an American: clearly out of scope. The story about 'Australian Muslim groups' starts off by saying that these are the views of "leading members of the Muslim community", and so obviously are not the 'radicals' which this article is supposed to cover. The fact that you raise these
336:
The article provides an important reference-documentation of significant issues for both the Australian Islamic community and the Australian community generally. The issues raised are obviously contentious, but rather than just a simple deletion, this (new) article can be improved with the addition
673:
NPOV does apply because radical is relative term that isnt clearly defined, the choice of lead which has no relation to the article content is intended to incite a bias and place Islam in a negative light only that is where the NPOV applies. Then use of unbalance(undue) and unrelated events(wynth)
507:
That's a nice red herring. The page does not paint Islamic culture at all, but cites instances where radicalism appears a trend. I in fact have argued for moving some material from the main page (e.g. statements by radical clerics to help differentiate between the main Islamic community and culture
312:
the material "does fly" on the main page. The issue is only the amount of material on a separate topic (namely, Islamic radicalism, a recent trend) is taking away from the main article on Islam in Australia (covering 500 years). Editors on that page have noted the material is increasing in size.
265:
The page is might have specific sections requiring additional supplementary information to help balance the article, but in no way is it, as DroverWife alleges, an "unredeemable" mess. And this page will actually help WP editors on Islam in Australia page to help distinguish between major events
245:
throwing "POV" accusations does not work in this instance to delete an article. Reliable sources were cited and some sections have been worked on by a number of editors to help keep it NPOV. If you point to a particular instance where the article represents "one side" then tag the section.
345:) 05:57, 20 August 2014 (UTC). The presentation of this new Knowledge (XXG) site does require refinement, but the issues covered should not be simply dismissed or just deleted away. For instance the latest-breaking-news, radical-Islam impacts on Australia. Position of the 888:
actual the unreliable source is the first and last one, the second is a case study of a police investigation of one specific terrorist group and not Islam.. the involvement of members of that group was found to be the result of family influences
401:
Don't see why you have to attack a new editor as acting in bad faith. He added plenty of content, not all bad. Instead, as a more experienced editor, it would be in your interest to help him edit in a manner that is more NPOV.
837:
the Society for Terrorism Research and our publisher Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
196: 380:
stories as somehow being relevant to the topic of the article raises real questions with me about whether you're editing in good faith here, or are seeking to use Knowledge (XXG) to push your views.
634:
the lead of the article has no association with the articles context, the sections in the body of the article have no direct association with each other except the implied religious connection.
595:
WP:Fork only applies where the central coverage of a complete topic is being split onto two pages. In this case there is not even a section on radical Islam on the Islam in Australia page.
236: 190: 149: 727:. This may not be intentional on the part of the original article creator, but it's definitely a collection of news topics without any scholarly research tying them together. 655:
WP:NPOV hardly applies as a reason for deletion in this instance. Plenty of effort was made to keep language neutral, and additional edits further refined the article tone.
467: 266:
concerning Australian Muslim community and minor fringe ones that can be relegated to its own page on fundamentalists. Thir creation of this page benifits everyone overall.
526: 850:
The Society for terrorism research isnt an independent 3rd party, and by its own admission it doesnt make any effort as to the accuracy of that which it publishes.
546: 40: 122: 117: 126: 156: 558: 830: 779: 736: 713: 641: 581: 538: 517: 499: 479: 458: 366: 275: 255: 109: 490:
the article is just a massive POV push by 2 editors, trying to paint Islamic culture as a massive problem. The term "radical" is incredibly subjective.
354: 840: 211: 178: 350: 346: 17: 937: 817:) The Australian govt's response to radical Islam in Australia by overhauling anti-terrorism laws, criticism of govt response. ( 113: 172: 896: 871: 857: 797: 758: 681: 664: 604: 411: 389: 322: 300: 91: 674:
means the regardless of the use of a refined tone the article still fails to be presented from a nuetral point of view.
232: 919: 168: 69: 46: 848:
Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
105: 97: 218: 775: 228: 867: 826: 754: 660: 600: 513: 407: 318: 271: 251: 810: 724: 915: 184: 65: 814: 771: 732: 570: 430: 893: 854: 678: 638: 204: 863: 822: 750: 656: 596: 574: 509: 434: 403: 362: 342: 314: 288: 267: 247: 82: 702: 631: 627: 442: 818: 793: 554: 534: 495: 58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
914:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
623: 438: 64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
475: 454: 385: 446: 426: 728: 709: 296: 843: 890: 851: 675: 635: 931: 358: 338: 862:
Sorry, didn't spot the non RS source there. Ignore and use the first and last only.
789: 550: 530: 491: 86: 770:. Valid topic. The article may have some issues, but none of them insurmountable. 143: 701:. Quite a few primary sources used, giving away the fact that this is a work of 578: 471: 450: 381: 705: 292: 811:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19434472.2012.727096)-similar
809:
scholarly sources on the topic:-study of terrorist network in Sydney (
429:: the article doesn't seek to place the issue in context, and is a 815:
http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/364
908:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
375:
Urm, that story about the PM refers to a (disgusting) incident
85:
as to whether this should be covered in its own section there.
25: 819:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10576100590950138
508:
in Australia and radical elements appearing only recently.
139: 135: 131: 203: 287:- If none of the material on this page would fly on 788:being a "valid" topic is not a reason for keeping. 217: 72:). No further edits should be made to this page. 922:). No further edits should be made to this page. 449:, and a blockable offence for whoever added it. 81:. Please start a discussion on the talk page of 468:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 527:list of Politics-related deletion discussions 8: 545:Note: This debate has been included in the 525:Note: This debate has been included in the 466:Note: This debate has been included in the 547:list of Islam-related deletion discussions 544: 524: 465: 313:Hence the need for a seperate article. 45:For an explanation of the process, see 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 41:deletion review on 2014 August 28 835:TandF self disclaimer specifies 29: 47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review 723:It seems like a clear case of 1: 897:12:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 872:10:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 858:03:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 831:02:13, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 798:04:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 780:20:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 759:02:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 737:04:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC) 714:10:22, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 682:04:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC) 665:16:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 642:10:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 605:16:39, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 582:01:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 559:17:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 539:17:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 518:02:25, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 500:12:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 480:12:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 459:11:59, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 412:16:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 390:12:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 367:10:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 351:Australian Justice Minister 337:of a wider set of inputs. 323:02:20, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 301:10:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 276:05:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 256:02:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 237:04:27, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 92:06:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 954: 106:Radical Islam in Australia 98:Radical Islam in Australia 347:Australian Prime Minister 938:Pages at deletion review 911:Please do not modify it. 355:Australian Muslim Groups 61:Please do not modify it. 437:article which violates 291:it shouldn't fly here. 227:Unredeemable POV mess. 622:this article violates 813:study of same group 349:. Position of the 575:Islam in Australia 435:Islam in Australia 289:Islam in Australia 83:Islam in Australia 77:The result was 561: 541: 482: 263:Keep & refine 229:The Drover's Wife 53: 52: 39:was subject to a 945: 913: 353:. Position of 222: 221: 207: 159: 147: 129: 89: 63: 33: 32: 26: 953: 952: 948: 947: 946: 944: 943: 942: 928: 927: 926: 920:deletion review 909: 772:CesareAngelotti 334:Keep and refine 164: 155: 120: 104: 101: 87: 70:deletion review 59: 37:This discussion 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 951: 949: 941: 940: 930: 929: 925: 924: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 803: 802: 801: 800: 783: 782: 764: 763: 762: 761: 740: 739: 717: 716: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 668: 667: 645: 644: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 585: 584: 563: 562: 542: 521: 520: 502: 484: 483: 462: 461: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 393: 392: 370: 369: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 304: 303: 279: 278: 259: 258: 225: 224: 161: 100: 95: 75: 74: 54: 51: 50: 44: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 950: 939: 936: 935: 933: 923: 921: 917: 912: 906: 898: 895: 892: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 873: 869: 865: 864:I.am.a.qwerty 861: 860: 859: 856: 853: 849: 845: 841: 839: 834: 833: 832: 828: 824: 823:I.am.a.qwerty 820: 816: 812: 808: 805: 804: 799: 795: 791: 787: 786: 785: 784: 781: 777: 773: 769: 766: 765: 760: 756: 752: 751:I.am.a.qwerty 747: 744: 743: 742: 741: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 719: 718: 715: 711: 707: 704: 700: 696: 695:Strong Delete 693: 692: 683: 680: 677: 672: 671: 670: 669: 666: 662: 658: 657:I.am.a.qwerty 654: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 643: 640: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 614: 613: 606: 602: 598: 597:I.am.a.qwerty 594: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 583: 580: 576: 572: 568: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 543: 540: 536: 532: 528: 523: 522: 519: 515: 511: 510:I.am.a.qwerty 506: 503: 501: 497: 493: 489: 488:strong delete 486: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 464: 463: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421: 420: 413: 409: 405: 404:I.am.a.qwerty 400: 397: 396: 395: 394: 391: 387: 383: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 335: 332: 331: 324: 320: 316: 315:I.am.a.qwerty 311: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 273: 269: 268:I.am.a.qwerty 264: 261: 260: 257: 253: 249: 248:I.am.a.qwerty 244: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 220: 216: 213: 210: 206: 202: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 177: 174: 170: 167: 166:Find sources: 162: 158: 154: 151: 145: 141: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 102: 99: 96: 94: 93: 90: 84: 80: 73: 71: 67: 62: 56: 55: 48: 42: 38: 35: 28: 27: 19: 910: 907: 847: 836: 806: 767: 745: 725:WP:SYNTHESIS 720: 698: 694: 652: 619: 615: 592: 566: 504: 487: 422: 398: 376: 333: 309: 284: 262: 242: 226: 214: 208: 200: 193: 187: 181: 175: 165: 152: 78: 76: 60: 57: 36: 630:its also a 191:free images 729:MezzoMezzo 571:WP:POVFORK 431:WP:POVFORK 916:talk page 846:requires 842:where as 551:• Gene93k 531:• Gene93k 433:from the 66:talk page 932:Category 918:or in a 703:WP:SYNTH 653:Response 632:WP:SYNTH 628:WP:UNDUE 593:Response 505:Response 443:WP:UNDUE 359:Sam56mas 339:Sam56mas 310:Response 243:Response 150:View log 88:Philg88 68:or in a 838:Content 807:Comment 790:LibStar 746:Comment 624:WP:NPOV 492:LibStar 439:WP:NPOV 399:Comment 377:in Iraq 285:Comment 197:WP refs 185:scholar 123:protect 118:history 721:Delete 616:Delete 567:Delete 472:Nick-D 451:Nick-D 447:WP:BLP 427:WP:TNT 423:Delete 382:Nick-D 169:Google 127:delete 79:delete 894:garra 855:garra 844:WP:RS 706:AlanS 679:garra 639:garra 573:from 569:as a 293:AlanS 212:JSTOR 173:books 157:Stats 144:views 136:watch 132:links 16:< 891:Gnan 868:talk 852:Gnan 827:talk 794:talk 776:talk 768:Keep 755:talk 733:talk 710:talk 699:Salt 697:and 676:Gnan 661:talk 636:Gnan 626:and 620:Salt 618:and 601:talk 555:talk 535:talk 514:talk 496:talk 476:talk 455:talk 441:and 425:per 408:talk 386:talk 363:talk 357:.. 343:talk 319:talk 297:talk 272:talk 252:talk 233:talk 205:FENS 179:news 140:logs 114:talk 110:edit 577:.-- 219:TWL 148:– ( 934:: 870:) 829:) 821:) 796:) 778:) 757:) 735:) 712:) 663:) 603:) 579:TM 557:) 549:. 537:) 529:. 516:) 498:) 478:) 470:. 457:) 410:) 388:) 365:) 321:) 299:) 274:) 254:) 235:) 199:) 142:| 138:| 134:| 130:| 125:| 121:| 116:| 112:| 43:. 866:( 825:( 792:( 774:( 753:( 731:( 708:( 659:( 599:( 553:( 533:( 512:( 494:( 474:( 453:( 406:( 384:( 361:( 341:( 317:( 295:( 270:( 250:( 231:( 223:) 215:· 209:· 201:· 194:· 188:· 182:· 176:· 171:( 163:( 160:) 153:· 146:) 108:( 49:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review on 2014 August 28
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
talk page
deletion review
Islam in Australia
 Philg88 
06:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Radical Islam in Australia
Radical Islam in Australia
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.