Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Raeez Lorgat - Knowledge

Source 📝

446:. The idea behind the article was that the Subject would be considered notable on the basis of receiving many national and international awards for original research performed by him and demonstrated at ISEF 2007, and further exemplified on the basis of coverage over TV and radio interviews across South Africa (I am South African myself). If the notability guidelines specifically outlaw accomplishment in the academic context of high school/university where the accomplishment is made notable through rewards in a contest, then the article should not be included. Will mark for deletion from my user name space. - 534:. However, in such cases it's up to the article authors to find the sources, and there are no guarantees of how much will be enough to satisfy an AfD discussion. In this particular case, I doubt that there would be enough, but there may, for example, be local politicians or religious figures who would be notable on the basis of print media coverage. -- 482:
Something I find interesting is that whilst the Subject is considered notable in his home country (South Africa), this may not hold true when (as demonstrated by requests for GS results etc) the subject's notability is scrutinized from a US/Internet coverage perspective - a distinction that is quite
286:
Can argue that a google search is not the only indicator of notability. Criteria #2 of WP:PROF is "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." which is the case here, as backed by direct and secondary sources; will cite more sources for
333:
Victories in academic student competitions at the high school and university level as well as other awards and honors for academic student achievements (at either high school, undergraduate or graduate level) do not qualify under Criterion 2 and do not count towards partially satisfying Criterion
487:
material was available for citation. I'm curious if there is even a procedure whereby offline sources are made available for citation? I suppose I'm more curious about this in general then in just the scope of this
162: 483:
important when you consider that there is virtually little to no internet presence regarding news in South Africa. A difficulty I had when researching and writing for this article was how little
463:
per Radagast, with special mention to Yellowjacketboys for being so gracious about it. It's a pleasant surprise to see the creator of an article not try to wikilawyer their way around an AFD.
307:
A number are so honored each year, with the awards given to promising scholars at the high school level. Unless their later achievements gain notice, the individual winners here
117: 156: 221: 247: 122: 507: 464: 90: 85: 538: 418: 374: 340: 94: 17: 310:
don't appear to merit separate articles. I interpret the guideline to refer to prestigious honors at the professional level.
177: 77: 144: 502:
Sources are not required to be online. Indeed, for many historical articles, online sources may not even exist. Read
493: 451: 292: 567: 36: 566:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
506:
and the related pages for more info on what sources are appropriate, how to cite them and other relevant info.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
193:
Brilliant young man, one of many so honored in the references provided. However, does not meet guidelines for
138: 511: 468: 489: 447: 288: 134: 550: 515: 497: 472: 455: 430: 409: 386: 352: 319: 296: 280: 262: 236: 210: 59: 81: 276: 535: 443: 415: 371: 337: 184: 546: 426: 382: 348: 170: 73: 65: 524: 198: 258: 232: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
308: 272: 150: 530:
for a template), and a large amount of South African print news coverage could meet the
397: 363: 328: 194: 55: 531: 405: 367: 315: 206: 254: 228: 111: 503: 414:
Actually, I only know because someone pointed that out to me on another AfD. --
50: 401: 311: 202: 560:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
396:
Thanks, Radagast3, for taking the time to read more of
107: 103: 99: 169: 442:. Will concede on the basis of the point made by 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 570:). No further edits should be made to this page. 183: 8: 222:list of Science-related deletion discussions 248:list of People-related deletion discussions 242: 216: 520:Indeed, offline media can be cited (see 246:: This debate has been included in the 220:: This debate has been included in the 7: 197:. Few or no acceptable sources, per 24: 201:. Google search offers little. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 532:general notability guidelines 60:00:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC) 587: 551:23:44, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 516:16:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 498:16:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 473:16:20, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 456:16:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 431:14:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 410:14:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 387:14:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 353:13:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 320:03:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 297:02:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 281:02:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 263:02:29, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 237:02:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 211:02:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 563:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 287:this particular issue. 271:. GS offers nothing. 331:says specifically " 44:The result was 366:, not enough for 265: 251: 239: 225: 578: 565: 542: 529: 523: 490:Yellowjacketboys 448:Yellowjacketboys 422: 378: 344: 289:Yellowjacketboys 252: 226: 188: 187: 173: 125: 115: 97: 34: 586: 585: 581: 580: 579: 577: 576: 575: 574: 568:deletion review 561: 543: 540: 527: 521: 423: 420: 379: 376: 345: 342: 130: 121: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 584: 582: 573: 572: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 539: 476: 475: 458: 436: 435: 434: 433: 419: 390: 389: 375: 356: 355: 341: 322: 301: 300: 284: 266: 240: 191: 190: 127: 123:AfD statistics 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 583: 571: 569: 564: 558: 552: 548: 544: 537: 533: 526: 519: 518: 517: 513: 509: 508:69.181.249.92 505: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 486: 481: 478: 477: 474: 470: 466: 465:69.181.249.92 462: 459: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 438: 437: 432: 428: 424: 417: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 392: 391: 388: 384: 380: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 339: 335: 330: 326: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 306: 303: 302: 298: 294: 290: 285: 282: 278: 274: 270: 267: 264: 260: 256: 249: 245: 241: 238: 234: 230: 223: 219: 215: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 186: 182: 179: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 136: 133: 132:Find sources: 128: 124: 119: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 562: 559: 484: 479: 460: 439: 400:than I did! 393: 359: 332: 324: 304: 268: 243: 217: 192: 180: 174: 166: 159: 153: 147: 141: 131: 74:Raeez Lorgat 66:Raeez Lorgat 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 327:Note #9 of 199:WP:RELIABLE 157:free images 273:Xxanthippe 525:Cite news 255:• Gene93k 229:• Gene93k 536:Radagast 488:article. 444:Radagast 416:Radagast 372:Radagast 362:. Fails 338:Radagast 118:View log 480:Comment 398:WP:PROF 394:Comment 364:WP:PROF 329:WP:PROF 325:Comment 305:Comment 195:WP:PROF 163:WP refs 151:scholar 91:protect 86:history 485:online 461:Delete 440:Delete 368:WP:GNG 360:Delete 269:Delete 135:Google 95:delete 46:delete 370:. -- 336:" -- 178:JSTOR 139:books 112:views 104:watch 100:links 48:. -- 16:< 547:talk 512:talk 504:WP:V 494:talk 469:talk 452:talk 427:talk 406:talk 383:talk 349:talk 316:talk 293:talk 277:talk 259:talk 244:Note 233:talk 218:Note 207:talk 171:FENS 145:news 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:Cirt 402:JNW 312:JNW 253:-- 227:-- 203:JNW 185:TWL 120:• 116:– ( 549:) 528:}} 522:{{ 514:) 496:) 471:) 454:) 429:) 408:) 385:) 351:) 334:1. 318:) 295:) 279:) 261:) 250:. 235:) 224:. 209:) 165:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 545:( 541:3 510:( 492:( 467:( 450:( 425:( 421:3 404:( 381:( 377:3 347:( 343:3 314:( 299:. 291:( 283:. 275:( 257:( 231:( 205:( 189:) 181:· 175:· 167:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 142:· 137:( 129:( 126:) 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Cirt
talk
00:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Raeez Lorgat
Raeez Lorgat
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
AfD statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:PROF
WP:RELIABLE
JNW

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.