605:(the word means a not-for-profit organisation that operates an art gallery) appears to me to be another positive contribution to her notability. However, apart from the fact I do not understand the scale of these German venues, I have only found a primary source for one of them; I have found no third party reliable sources for the tour; only the web page for the Hatje Cantz catalogue mentions them all. Perhaps I am not looking deeply enough into German language sources. -
564:
Without looking too deeply into this yet, it is getting there but it is not there yet. Going in its favour are a book dedicated to her work published by a major publisher (I cannot tell for sure but it appears to be more a monograph than an exhibition catalogue, though it is strictly the latter); her
508:
I removed one NYT article because it was merely a free ads type listing on a page with many of the same. The remaining NYT article is not a review, it is just a simple mention of the
Venables exhibition ("Complementing it are solo photography exhibitions by Raissa Venables and Shandor Hassan, who are
493:
removed several permanent collections which don't have any/all of their collections online, therefore they cannot be verified. Given that the others I looked for were there, I am disinclined to simply TNT the others. What confuses me is that I cannot find any of the german press. I searched directly
466:
I have added another exhibition catalogue (solo publication of hers), the Jersey City exhibition at a public gallery, and a collection at a public institution. Though her web site claims her work is held in many more public collections, on first glance only three appear to be public. I have sourced
343:
I can't see what either of those sources establishes about her. They seem to be lists of works, in one of them I think she just has a photo credit. Please can you explain in more detail what you are referring to to establish notability. I have no problem with the sources being in German and
Italian
433:
the museum shows and monographs look good on first glance but are less notable on closer examination. It's one monograph and one exhibition catalogue. The majority of the solo exhibitions are at a private galleries. I see two museum solo shows: the New jersey Museum and the
484:
take a look at what I added. I agree it isn't quite as clearcut, but I think it still fits. The NJM show was reviewed in the NYT. I disagree that a catalog for a kunstverein show published by Hatje Kantz doesn't contribute to notability. Per my convo on
569:("The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book..."). However
364:
I was going to say the same thing. The Hatje Kantz publication points to some kind of professional success, but it is not independent. It's hard to find significant, independent reliable sources. The ones added above by
565:
work held in the collection of at least one major institution; and she has had a solo exhibition at at least one significant public institution. This alone appears to achieve minimum demonstration of notability for
169:
509:
both based in Jersey City."), in a wider review of the various exhibitions showing at that venue. It might even be advisable to remove this ref too, or use it to prove the point of her residence. -
527:
I put the NYT review back in, but left the listings out. Generally, there is no such thing as a "free add type listing" with NYT. Everything goes through editorial. Its not Time Out. The
494:
on the websites, and via my university databases, and I couldn't find the key ones (Berliner
Zeitung, Die Welt, S-Z) but it probably doesn't help that I don't really speak german...
321:
I added several references to the article which contain significant coverage of this artist. There is nothing wrong with using references in the German language. Subject now meets
236:
122:
253:
163:
389:
415:
She has solo museum shows, and two monographs written about her work. The article is a mess, but she is notable. I’m on mobile or I would drop the key things in now.
219:
270:
303:
applies here. I love her work but the page appears to be a promotional effort created in 2010 by her gallery. Notability not demonstrated by published sources.
486:
467:
one and have added the other 2 without sources so as to help us in looking but please remove these if you think it inappropriate to add without sources. -
438:, which does not look too bad. I'm not adverse to being converted to keep, but I think the notability is more marginal than her CV makes it out to be.
129:
481:
439:
393:
370:
305:
95:
90:
535:
is a review: it says so even in the URL slug. It is a review of all three shows at that venue. I disagree that including it is UNDUE.
99:
17:
82:
184:
151:
656:
40:
145:
443:
397:
374:
309:
639:
614:
592:
544:
540:
518:
503:
499:
476:
461:
457:
447:
424:
420:
401:
378:
359:
334:
313:
299:
A search turned up numerous name checks in long lists of artists, and a few short German language mentions.
282:
278:
262:
245:
228:
211:
141:
64:
452:
Hmm... ok. I will look closer, and see what I see. It may take a day or two, as I'm maxxed IRL right now.
652:
36:
574:
191:
86:
300:
610:
588:
579:
514:
472:
257:
240:
223:
177:
627:
566:
201:
635:
536:
528:
495:
453:
416:
274:
366:
326:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
651:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
157:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
413:
322:
330:
78:
70:
606:
584:
532:
524:
510:
490:
468:
55:
631:
352:
208:
116:
602:
204:. There are inadequate references in the article to demonstrate notability --
200:
I don't believe this article satisfied the notability requirements under
435:
345:
205:
647:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
112:
108:
104:
489:
this is one step further from a museum didactic text.
176:
190:
601:A solo exhibition that toured a series of redlink
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
659:). No further edits should be made to this page.
487:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Lucie Chan
388:Note: This discussion has been included in the
269:Note: This discussion has been included in the
252:Note: This discussion has been included in the
237:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
235:Note: This discussion has been included in the
218:Note: This discussion has been included in the
369:are either not significant coverage or not RS.
254:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
390:list of Artists-related deletion discussions
220:list of People-related deletion discussions
387:
271:list of Women-related deletion discussions
268:
251:
234:
217:
573:there seems to not be enough coverage by
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
344:(I speak both languages moderately)
325:and therefore should be retained.
24:
1:
575:independent reliable sources
676:
640:07:24, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
615:14:27, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
545:15:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
65:11:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
593:20:48, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
519:20:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
504:19:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
477:14:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
462:13:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
448:02:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
425:01:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
402:22:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
379:22:00, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
360:16:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
335:09:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
314:07:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
283:00:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
263:05:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
246:05:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
229:05:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
212:03:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
649:Please do not modify it.
294:after discussion below.
32:Please do not modify it.
580:The Hudson Reporter
529:Benjamin Genocchio
404:
285:
265:
248:
231:
63:
667:
357:
350:
260:
243:
226:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
675:
674:
670:
669:
668:
666:
665:
664:
663:
657:deletion review
583:all there is? -
577:– is the local
353:
346:
258:
241:
224:
137:
128:
93:
79:Raissa Venables
77:
74:
71:Raissa Venables
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
673:
671:
662:
661:
643:
642:
620:
619:
618:
617:
596:
595:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
533:New York Times
531:review in the
482:104.163.158.37
464:
440:104.163.158.37
436:Roswell museum
428:
427:
412:here is a CV.
406:
405:
394:104.163.158.37
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
371:104.163.158.37
338:
337:
316:
306:104.163.158.37
287:
286:
266:
249:
232:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
672:
660:
658:
654:
650:
645:
644:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
621:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
598:
597:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:
576:
572:
568:
563:
560:
559:
546:
542:
538:
537:Theredproject
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
507:
506:
505:
501:
497:
496:Theredproject
492:
488:
483:
480:
479:
478:
474:
470:
465:
463:
459:
455:
454:Theredproject
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
432:
431:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
417:Theredproject
414:
411:
408:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
386:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
358:
356:
355:(Talk to me!)
351:
349:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
315:
311:
307:
304:
302:
298:
293:
290:Switching to
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:Coolabahapple
272:
267:
264:
261:
255:
250:
247:
244:
238:
233:
230:
227:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
209:(Talk to me!)
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
648:
646:
623:
578:
570:
561:
409:
354:
347:
318:
296:
295:
291:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
603:Kunstverein
164:free images
301:WP:TOOSOON
58:Sandstein
653:talk page
628:WP:ARTIST
607:Lopifalko
585:Lopifalko
567:WP:ARTIST
525:Lopifalko
511:Lopifalko
491:Lopifalko
469:Lopifalko
202:WP:ARTIST
37:talk page
655:or in a
632:Hmlarson
259:MT Train
242:MT Train
225:MT Train
123:View log
39:or in a
562:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
571:so far
323:WP:GNG
297:Delete
142:Google
100:delete
367:Z359q
327:Z359q
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
636:talk
626:per
624:Keep
611:talk
589:talk
541:talk
515:talk
500:talk
473:talk
458:talk
444:talk
421:talk
410:keep
398:talk
375:talk
331:talk
319:Keep
310:talk
292:Keep
279:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
50:keep
523:Hi
192:TWL
121:– (
638:)
630:.
613:)
591:)
543:)
517:)
502:)
475:)
460:)
446:)
423:)
400:)
392:.
377:)
348:Pi
333:)
312:)
281:)
273:.
256:.
239:.
222:.
206:Pi
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
634:(
609:(
587:(
539:(
513:(
498:(
471:(
456:(
442:(
419:(
396:(
373:(
329:(
308:(
277:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.