Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Raja Saadat Khan - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

243:: I believe that this article should be deleted because I can find no mention of this name in relation to being a Victoria Cross recipient. As per Yar Mohammad Khan I have spent hours looking for information (I do not take deleting articles of this nature lightly as if he is a true recipient the subject is worthy of a mention in Knowledge (XXG)), however, I could find no mention in the National Archives VC register, nor could I find anything related in a Google or Google books search. I have asked the creator to provide proper verifiable sources (not just the throw away general references already included, but page numbers and direct links, e.g. to the London Gazette), however, they have not responded and have not improved the article to allay my concerns. Given that many people have done a lot of hard work correlating information on VC recipients both in the National Archives and here on wikipedia (and elsewhere) I believe that if this subject were a true recipient (or an alternative name of one) it would be documented some where. As it is not, I feel that all we can do is delete the article. — 134:
and this person has no listing, he has no listing in a well-used reference work regarding VCs, Max Arthur's Symbols of courage. There is no listing in the National Archives, no web references to suggest this might be an alternative name. The user who created this has not responded to concerns though
123: 219: 130:
This article is a hoax. No reference exists for a person under this name who has won the Victoria Cross. All recipients of the Victoria Cross are listed in the
90: 85: 94: 17: 77: 284: 36: 248: 230: 265: 140: 283:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
269: 252: 234: 207: 188: 169: 151: 59: 81: 184: 244: 226: 73: 65: 261: 165: 180: 136: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
203: 147: 179:
Article is a hoax - no reshaping has taken place and no credible sources. Speedy Delete--
161: 131: 55: 111: 199: 143: 50: 141:
Wikipedia_talk:MILHIST#Are there any Victoria Cross experts out there?
135:
he has continued to edit. Note user created two articles: this and
277:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
198:
VC holders are well documented. This cannot be legitimate.
118: 107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 287:). No further edits should be made to this page. 220:list of Military-related deletion discussions 8: 214: 218:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 304: 270:11:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 253:00:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 235:00:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 208:23:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 189:20:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 170:20:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 152:18:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 60:04:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 139:. Also see discussion at 280:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 237: 223: 137:Yar Mohammad Khan 295: 282: 245:AustralianRupert 227:AustralianRupert 224: 121: 115: 97: 74:Raja Saadat Khan 66:Raja Saadat Khan 48:. Snow, as hoax 34: 303: 302: 298: 297: 296: 294: 293: 292: 291: 285:deletion review 278: 262:David Underdown 117: 88: 72: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 301: 299: 290: 289: 273: 272: 255: 238: 211: 210: 192: 191: 173: 172: 132:London Gazette 128: 127: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 300: 288: 286: 281: 275: 274: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 254: 250: 246: 242: 239: 236: 232: 228: 221: 217: 213: 212: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 175: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 145: 142: 138: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 279: 276: 257: 240: 215: 195: 181:WikiKing2012 176: 157: 129: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 162:TomStar81 160:per nom. 260:per nom 124:View log 91:protect 86:history 258:Delete 241:Delete 200:Gwinva 196:Delete 177:Delete 158:Delete 119:delete 95:delete 46:delete 144:Woody 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 266:talk 249:talk 231:talk 216:Note 204:talk 185:talk 166:Talk 148:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 56:talk 51:DGG 268:) 251:) 233:) 222:. 206:) 187:) 168:) 150:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 58:) 264:( 247:( 229:( 225:— 202:( 183:( 164:( 146:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
DGG
talk
04:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Raja Saadat Khan
Raja Saadat Khan
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
London Gazette
Yar Mohammad Khan
Wikipedia_talk:MILHIST#Are there any Victoria Cross experts out there?
Woody
talk
18:55, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
TomStar81
Talk
20:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
WikiKing2012
talk
20:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.