262:
They don't care to be associated with Sylmar. It does not seem to be a traditional name of this section, but residents feel the neighborhood is distinctive enough to warrant a separation. If it does become an officially recognized neighborhood (no sign of that happening soon), I'd say "keep." But
260:
258:
162:
310:. Media sources seem to indicate that name change proposal was never made official. (If there was sourced content here, we could merge. I've added a short sentence to the Sylmar article.)
156:
210:
117:
122:
193:
Little to no content. Might even be a QD candidate. Also, not sure it's notable...I live in LA, and I haven't even heard of this place
90:
85:
94:
77:
252:
17:
177:
144:
333:
138:
36:
332:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
318:
299:
272:
243:
225:
199:
134:
59:
81:
295:
194:
184:
251:- From what reliable sources say, "Rancho Cascades" is the name that residents of the western part of
73:
65:
170:
268:
239:
221:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150:
291:
282:
55:
264:
311:
235:
217:
111:
256:
50:
234:- Is there any information about its population? Amenities? Schools?
285:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
326:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
169:
290:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
336:). No further edits should be made to this page.
211:list of California-related deletion discussions
183:
8:
205:
209:: This debate has been included in the
7:
255:want to rename their neighborhood.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
353:
273:23:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
244:19:51, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
226:23:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
200:18:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
263:right now I'm not sure.--
329:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
319:06:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
300:00:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
60:15:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
44:The result was
302:
228:
214:
344:
331:
289:
287:
215:
197:
196:Purplebackpack89
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
352:
351:
347:
346:
345:
343:
342:
341:
340:
334:deletion review
327:
280:
195:
130:
121:
88:
74:Rancho Cascades
72:
69:
66:Rancho Cascades
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
350:
348:
339:
338:
322:
321:
304:
303:
288:
277:
276:
275:
246:
229:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
349:
337:
335:
330:
324:
323:
320:
317:
316:
315:
309:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
286:
284:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
261:
259:
257:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
328:
325:
313:
312:
307:
281:
248:
231:
206:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
292:Ron Ritzman
157:free images
218:• Gene93k
283:Relisted
265:Oakshade
249:Not Sure
118:View log
314:TheFeds
236:Bearian
232:Comment
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
308:Delete
253:Sylmar
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
296:talk
269:talk
240:talk
222:talk
207:Note
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
216:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
298:)
271:)
242:)
224:)
213:.
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
294:(
267:(
238:(
220:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.