304:
the Seals says they'll be testing the system--there's no documentation that they're using it. JJL, on the talk page you said it's covered in Black Belt magazine. I went to the magazine's web site and searched unsuccessfully for an article on either this system or Paul Vunak, but I admit that's not necessarily conclusive. Vunak's DVDs and books are obviously not independent sources. An independent article on this system, combined with the letters I read, could convince me to support keeping this article.
303:
This article seems closely tied to the one on Paul Vunak--it seems like they're either both notable or both NN. The letters of appreciation on the subject's home page are nice, but I'd like to see some 3rd party coverage. Even the letters aren't completely convincing. For example, the letter from
344:
A Google search seems to suggest that the Black Belt
Magazine article about Vunak was April 2006 - not sure if anyone has accessible archives going far enough back - anyone know a library that could provide access? If that's the only independent source available then it's probably not notable
321:
due to non-notability. There are no URLs with ".gov" in them that reference Paul Vunak. And per JJL's previous comments on the talk page: Anybody can make a claim about teaching something to Navy Seals, and it may technically be true. I can personally make claims that I've trained to become a
366:) describes the system as a "top secret hand-to-hand fighting system" that allows anyone to "become a lethal weapon in just hours." The system certainly does not seem to be widespread. I'll consider changing my vote, but only with some proof of independent coverage.
159:
213:
120:
153:
362:
Actually, I believe the cover was April 2008. I haven't read the article, which is apparently titled "The Only Weapon
Technique You'll Ever Need". The website (
93:
88:
97:
326:, that I've trained with Special Forces, and that I've actually trained Special Forces recruits/members myself. My claims are entirely true, but
80:
346:
323:
17:
174:
141:
390:
135:
36:
375:
354:
339:
330:
misleading. The only source for the Wiki article in question is to Paul Vunak's page itself. Delete with prejudice.
313:
295:
268:
246:
228:
202:
62:
131:
84:
389:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350:
181:
76:
68:
260:
197:
167:
147:
278:
371:
335:
309:
291:
55:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
255:
191:
367:
331:
305:
287:
242:
224:
48:
114:
238:
220:
281:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
363:
383:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
i would change my mind if i saw an article talk about it
110:
106:
102:
166:
345:enough. -- Medains (not logged in due to laziness)
286:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
180:
214:list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
393:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
237:per my previous comments on the Talk page.
208:
212:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
190:Non-notable self-defense system
364:http://scientificfighting.com/
1:
376:01:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
355:13:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
340:23:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
314:00:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
296:00:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
269:10:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
247:22:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
229:22:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
203:17:29, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
63:02:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
410:
386:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Rapid Assault Tactics
69:Rapid Assault Tactics
44:The result was
298:
231:
217:
401:
388:
285:
283:
267:
263:
258:
218:
200:
194:
185:
184:
170:
118:
100:
58:
51:
34:
409:
408:
404:
403:
402:
400:
399:
398:
397:
391:deletion review
384:
276:
265:
261:
256:
198:
192:
127:
91:
75:
72:
56:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
407:
405:
396:
395:
379:
378:
357:
347:82.219.208.105
342:
316:
300:
299:
284:
273:
272:
271:
249:
232:
188:
187:
124:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
406:
394:
392:
387:
381:
380:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
343:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
319:Strong Delete
317:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
282:
280:
275:
274:
270:
264:
259:
253:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
195:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
60:
59:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
385:
382:
359:
327:
318:
277:
251:
234:
209:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
54:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
324:Green Beret
193:Orange Mike
154:free images
328:extremely
368:Papaursa
332:FFLaguna
306:Papaursa
288:Tim Song
279:Relisted
121:View log
160:WP refs
148:scholar
94:protect
89:history
360:Delete
252:Delete
132:Google
98:delete
50:Jayron
46:Delete
257:Cynof
175:JSTOR
136:books
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
372:talk
351:talk
336:talk
310:talk
292:talk
266:avuf
243:talk
235:Keep
225:talk
210:Note
199:Talk
168:FENS
142:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
239:JJL
221:JJL
196:|
182:TWL
119:– (
374:)
353:)
338:)
312:)
294:)
245:)
227:)
216:.
162:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
57:32
370:(
349:(
334:(
308:(
290:(
262:G
241:(
223:(
219:—
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.