129:. I'm not sure what the precedent is so no vote at the moment, but my personal feeling is that as this band are unsigned (or were when I last checked), they weren't the headliners on the tour, they are not yet sufficiently notable. --
295:
Actually whoever wrote the article should have *cited* evidence of notability, in the beginning. I disagreed with the deleting admin, but really the fault here lies primarily with the creation of an (originally) unsourced article.
286:-- whoever deleted the page should have checked for evidence of notability themselves; the band have sufficient media profile in the UK for notability to have been assumed.
102:
161:
Though I'm not sure that touring as a support act satisfies WP:MUSIC, since it's a fairly notable tour with a large audience, I'd say it does push them over the bar.
89:
by virtue of their current national tour dates supporting the UK arm of the Arctic
Monkeys' tour, after which they perform more dates in their own right. --
243:
191:
255:
203:
188:
as they have another tour soon and the love will spread further. I know ive searched on here for them before only to be disappointed.
17:
232:
not only have they played support on a very notable and high profile UK tour, but have braced the pages of magazines such as
219:
300:
290:
269:
224:
180:
153:
133:
113:
93:
76:
51:
277:
in agreement with reasons cited on the deletion appeal, esp. tour support, mentions in NME and airplay on Radio 1
320:
36:
319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251:
240:
and judging by their rate of success so far, will bring many more reasons to keep this page in coming months.
199:
57:
90:
247:
214:
287:
195:
63:
Undeleted after a DRV discussion, but many called for relisting this. Unsure about notability here so
278:
145:
71:
265:
My argument is well documented on the
Deletion Appeal log page. :) Definately meets WP:MUSIC.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
150:
142:
126:
106:
86:
162:
68:
297:
130:
110:
237:
48:
213:
per above. Support bands surely meet the touring requirement of WP:MUSIC. --
313:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:
109:. And thanks to Sjakkalle for the doing the undeletion. --
105:
by
Captmonkey, who reasonably demonstrated it meets
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
103:Knowledge:Deletion review/Reverend and The Makers
323:). No further edits should be made to this page.
236:and Sandman, recieve airplay on major slots on
8:
121:It all comes down to whether touring as
7:
24:
141:per Tony Sidaway and Thivierr.
101:pursuant to arguements made in
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
44:The result of the debate was
340:
316:Please do not modify it.
301:18:55, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
291:15:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
270:14:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
52:16:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
225:23:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
181:13:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
154:12:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
134:10:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
114:07:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
94:06:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
77:06:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
58:Reverend and The Makers
246:comment was added by
194:comment was added by
125:is enough to satisfy
259:
223:
207:
85:. Easily passes
74:
331:
318:
241:
217:
189:
178:
175:
172:
169:
148:
72:
34:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
327:
321:deletion review
314:
242:—The preceding
190:—The preceding
176:
173:
170:
167:
146:
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
326:
325:
308:
306:
305:
304:
303:
281:
272:
260:
248:88.107.163.124
227:
215:badlydrawnjeff
208:
183:
163:Andrew Lenahan
156:
136:
116:
96:
60:
55:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
324:
322:
317:
311:
310:
309:
302:
299:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
282:
280:
276:
273:
271:
268:
264:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
239:
235:
231:
228:
226:
221:
216:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
187:
184:
182:
179:
164:
160:
157:
155:
152:
149:
144:
140:
137:
135:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
115:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
88:
84:
81:
80:
79:
78:
75:
70:
66:
59:
56:
54:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
315:
312:
307:
288:212.56.68.42
283:
274:
262:
229:
210:
196:84.68.66.122
185:
166:
158:
138:
123:support band
122:
118:
98:
91:Tony Sidaway
82:
64:
62:
45:
43:
31:
28:
267:Captmonkey
220:WP:MEMES?
159:Weak keep
69:Sjakkalle
279:craigand
256:contribs
244:unsigned
204:contribs
192:unsigned
143:DarthVad
131:kingboyk
127:WP:MUSIC
107:WP:MUSIC
87:WP:MUSIC
73:(Check!)
238:Radio 1
119:Comment
65:no vote
49:Raichu
16:<
284:Keep
275:Keep
263:Keep
252:talk
230:Keep
211:Keep
200:talk
186:Keep
139:Keep
99:Keep
83:Keep
46:keep
298:Rob
258:) .
234:NME
206:) .
174:bli
111:Rob
296:--
254:•
202:•
177:nd
171:ar
168:St
165:-
67:.
250:(
222:)
218:(
198:(
151:r
147:e
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.