1047:
expected - and granted, the Pope praying is not notable - but given the context Wiki recording who and what has been pledged is a useful precis of the events following the earthquake. The reactions article being separate avoids the main article losing its focus. The reactions article being separate allows Wiki to have in one place a record of pledges, reactions, something the mainstream media cannot complete. It allows Wiki to keep an unique record of world attitudes to China (generally) and natural disasters in tighter economic circumstances (more specifically). If it is curently a "bunch of lists" then be bold and change it - put it tables, or regional blocks, or turn it into a prose article with highlighted maps and charts.
1114:
we could in the past. If we can find a way to make these sections relevant - and in many cases they already are - then we are onto a winner. If we can show, for example, that Nation X has pledged half as much as Nation Z, we can leave the reader to decide why that may be. The articles could place the reactions in a table, or show the geographic spread through maps or such like, to give an idea bout the worldwide context of the event. I am sure with consultation and consensus this article, adn the wider issue of reaction articles, can be saved
182:
regret... sympathy and condolences") are not. If
Uruguay had said "we're really glad this happened", or if Malawi had said, "we don't give a fig about the quake", it would at least have been interesting, but this is dry as well as transitory. So, yes, it's sourced, but so is the entire run of newspapers every day - not everything in the news merits an encyclopedia article. Given that none of these reactions was profound enough that probably anyone will remember them a week's hence, let's delete for lack of notability.
734:"Sometimes side articles like 2004 U.S. election voting controversies and 2004 U.S. presidential election controversy and irregularities can be created to help to stabilize content on the main article, in this example, the U.S. presidential election, 2004 article. A compelling reason for creating side articles is that various editors will continue to add the same details of current events to the main article unless there is another place for the rapid influx of information to be recorded."
1158:. The 2008 Sichuan earthquake is one of the major natural catastrophes of all times. How different countries react to it reflects not only their stated position in aiding, but also to some extent, their relation with China. It is also good for record keeping, if we want to check if the promised aids were delivered. Besides, this article exist only because the original article is getting too long. Surely nobody would like to wipe out the entire "International relief" section in the
589:. I'm the 'creator of this article' mentioned above. I feel my opinions have been somewhat misconstrued. I created it after considerable discussion on the original article page, in which I wanted to delete the secion, and the 'Foreign and domestic aid' secion. A compromise seemed to be moving it into a separate article, which met no opposition, so that's what I did it.
1052:
Without this article being separate, the original article (already with an aid pledge section) will become very long and unwieldy. Without this section at all, Wiki administrators may have to decide whether a new policy will have to be drawn up, for I suspect the international reaction sections were
502:
announcements of sympathy. As governments and NGOs frequently make such announcements they are of little encyclopedic value. These mainly get into news stories as a local angle and into
Knowledge probably for similar motivations but also in both cases due to a lack of high-quality information on the
1113:
This is why I think maybe a review of international reaction articles/sections should be started. I really believe these sections have an encyclopedic value, certainly if we look back at how certain leaders or certain nations spoke to or about others in certain years, in ways far more specific than
321:
To address your substantive point - yes, the earthquake deserves an article, as I said. That doesn't mean a string of officials saying "we're sorry" (which always happens after a disaster) is also notable, and the fact that the article is well-sourced, as I have said, does not imply conformity with
181:
Yet another silly "reactions to..." article. It fails WP:N, which requires "more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability". The earthquake itself is notable, no doubt. The boilerplate reactions to it ("deep sorrow... deep
48:
Few dispute that we could have an article on this topic, but consensus, as determined by weighing the strength of arguments made here, is that we do not need an article that is essentially a digest of dozens of government statements to the effect of "we're very sorry." Many "delete" arguments cite
1260:
What comes from the messages on both sides above is a need to evaluate the policy on international reactions, major news event articles, and how best to bring into articles the reactions from world bodies. I am not sure how to go about this, but could someone with a bit of clout initiate a policy
980:
Knowledge is not an information store. If all information is correctly cited, then nothing unique is contained within. Otherwise it would be original research. Therefore all information is publicly available - we don't need to store it up for future generations. The content here is not worthy of
1046:
I was one of the editors who discussed on the earthquake article talk page about the hiving off of this article. The numerous "allowed" reaction-to-events articles have been mentioned before so I will not rattle through them here. The world has reacted to this event, now i know it is usual and
283:
Otolemur, I turned a blind eye when you were harassing the IP, but this will not hold. Please stop accusing people of things like this. Just because you disagree with them, does not give you the right to accuse people. Go discuss this on the talk page, or debate peacefully for its keep.
1236:
That is definitely a good idea. However, you have missed quite a few important points from some countries. If you can do this completely and fully, then this article will definitely survive. I still think some material should be merged back to the main article, though.
387:
The creator of this article says that he will try his best to improve this article within 4 days, but if it does not meet standards, leave a message on my talk page and I will perform the merge. You may delete afterwards. If it passes, then everything is all fine.
1484:. I have a good idea all set up for it, which can be seen in the main article's talk page. Any comments are welcome. But I agree with the nominator that this article seems like random scraps of information as well as a large amount of duplication,
782:
As I said before: that all is a matter of course and an act of courtesy. Not worth to loose any word on it. What has some value is the other list in the main aticle concerning financial/material/personal assistance. That's not questioned here.
804:. The colorful flags are very pretty, but the article has no other utility. Of course if there are a few countries that don't sent their condolences and say that its good that the earthquake happened - by all means, that's notable.--
206:
I opposed the move in the first place, but it was moved anyways. So I stayed shut and worked on improving this particular article. I will now work on reaching consensus to move this back to the main article. Give me a day or two.
877:) that have developed a fair level of encyclopedic content. The article in its current state is not very encyclopedic, however, given the fact that this is an ongoing event; it is presumptuous to terminate this article so soon.
1502:
The merger would increase the quality of the main article, since the main article is just a list of countries and money figures. A single, nice quote from a nice leader would be a nice thing to go along with the list of money.
244:
Bad faith nom. I will propose to take some measures against the nominator so that he cannot disrupt the AfDs. This is well-sourced article documenting the international reaction to a major earthquake. We have similar articles
645:
I think this article should be deleted, it's not worhty of its own article and the content should definitly be merged. I echo
Otolemur crassicaudatus's comments above though, that nom is ridiculous, badly written and bad
631:
I can summarise the article in four words: "ground shakes. people sad." - as the nom says, this is just a list of boilerplate reactions, unlike 9/11 or
Lebanon where you can have X governments supporting and Y opposing.
343:
per nom. It's easy to rack up sources showing that multiple countries expressed sympathy for the victims of this earthquake, but harder to explain why that qualifies as an encyclopedia article. Unlike in the case of
981:
inclusion in an encyclopaedia; therefore it should be chopped. If, some time later, someone wishes to construct an article on 'reactions' then noone would be happier than me. For now, it surely has to go. --
1480:. I am still intent on the merger. Based on some of the comments above, I somehow disillusioned myself that somebody would come and fix it. Seeing as nothing is happening, I am now, once again, considering
1138:
I'm all for a centralised review of the "international reaction" articles - right now we're creating them in a sort of haphazard way after many big events, but a review, a policy even, would serve us well.
960:
I dont think there is much doubt that the subject will continue to be important enough for this sort of detailed coverage.People should letthis sort of article be developed, not rushing in the same day.
441:
the reactions page is merged into the main page about the earthquake, we should leave a redirect rather than deleting the reactions page altogether. This is the standard procedure to comply with the
764:
United States: President George W. Bush gave China his condolences, and stated that "the thoughts and prayers of the
American people are with the Chinese people, especially those directly affected.
120:
115:
124:
1208:. Still, I do think Knowledge can have something, one way or another, on reactions around the world, which makes me reluctant to endorse deletion as the solution to what ails this article.
298:
Anyways, those reactions that you've listed have things in them besides just a list of countries. Plus, the 32kb standard, if that even is a standard, can be surpassed, greatly, at that. --
1395:
The "short burst" clause of WP:N should not apply. This is not really regular news reporting. Considering most of these nations have some kind of business or political tie with the PRC.
107:
1275:
If you have ideas and some energy to put into it, I'd say you would have enough clout to give it a try. I'd suggest coming up with a moderately specific proposal, and taking it up at
469:
Yes, that's what I meant. Consensus on the talk page seems to be leaning towards a merge; and will probably end up as such, unless Chzz manages to bring this article up to scratch. --
903:
Also, the "Foreign and domestic aid" section from the main article will ultimately need to be integrated (as per the
Hurricane Katrina article) for the desired educational value.
1582:
838:
1334:
at best. This just doesn't look very encyclopaedic, but I think it'd look like good
Wikiquote material.... though a bit too abstract for that. Perhaps with additional work... --
568:
Again, yes, it's sourced. But it's also quite ephemeral - that X,Y and Z expressed their condolences is not exactly encyclopedic material, per the "short burst" clause of WP:N.
1436:. We are an encyclopedia. If this information is notable, of encyclopedic value, then that's one thing. But it isn't - I invite you to review the "short burst" clause of
412:
Haha169, I'm open to various suggestions. I prefer deletion (which is why I made the nomination), but if consensus leads in another direction, I suppose that's fine too.
671:
I'm sorry, but my nomination was written in good
English and presented policy-based reasons for deletion. No bad faith was involved - or would you like to point it out?
77:. And, Otolemur crassicaudatus, making an AfD contribution in the form of a personal attack on the nominator is one of the surest ways to get your opinion discounted.
1053:
becoming something of a standard following events. If this deletion goes through, then this "consensus built standard" will fall under question indeed. I say "keep"
692:– the contents is in no way from encyclopaedical value. That the Pope prayed and Dubya sent his condolences is an act of courtesy but no information at all. See als
318:
I invite you to take those measures - there's nothing out of the ordinary in this nomination and any official fora are bound to laugh off a complaint of "frivolity".
345:
246:
153:
1205:
111:
1611:
Another worthy idea, assuming those reactions were suitably notable and the article didn't simply become a dumping ground for random quotes and bits of news.
1461:. But there is a fair amount of duplication between this and the main article. The merger might be a better idea. In any case, the deletion is unneeded. --
1586:
1578:
842:
834:
250:
383:
Pegasus, could you describe your ideas for a plausible merge on the
Earthquake article's talk page? It would be helpful to hear more opinions. Thanks!
870:
862:
1418:
this page is very important and includes info that may become harder to find later on as the user aboove said so I agree it should be kept.Thank you.
1574:
1556:
regarding the proposed merges; the main article is already large as it is. It would be much more plausible to instead merge the bulk of information
737:
103:
95:
1537:
Not everything. Just the important ones like North Korea and United States. See full list in talk page. (Also, only snippets of those sections.) --
1261:
review article or discussion article? It would help in the long run, I have some ideas, and it may be good to build a consensus going forward.
846:
1620:
1606:
1546:
1532:
1512:
1497:
1470:
1449:
1427:
1404:
1390:
1368:
1349:
1322:
1288:
1270:
1246:
1231:
1217:
1188:
1171:
1148:
1123:
1095:
1081:
1062:
1036:
1018:
998:
972:
946:
920:
894:
822:
792:
757:
723:
705:
680:
662:
638:
621:
577:
559:
542:
525:
511:
478:
452:
421:
397:
378:
359:
331:
307:
293:
274:
230:
216:
191:
175:
89:
874:
866:
858:
938:
854:
784:
261:
is becoming too long. To maintain wikipedia's standard article size, i.e. 32 KB, this information cannot be merged. The nom is frivolous.
850:
167:
652:
270:
322:
WP:N. Not every scrap of news deserves its place in an encyclopedia. You're free to disagree, but please do so in a civil fashion.
812:
17:
1222:
I like that proposal. Should the article survive deletion (as appears probable), it ought to receive our full consideration.
442:
1345:
371:
597:
I did not say I would improve the article within 4 days; I said that we should await the result of this AFD, referencing
263:
604:
My opinion is that it would devalue the main article, as the information is not worthy of an encyclopaedic article. --
257:
type argument, but this topic is valid topic. Not only this, any this kind of topic is valid topic. The main article
57:(as applied to the condolence messages, not the quake itself). The "keep" arguments do not address the interesting
1640:
36:
503:
event, thus they fill a news vacuum in the initial hours. But they have very little value to an encyclopedia. --
1639:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1276:
942:
788:
449:
356:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
776:
Brunei: Prime
Minister Hassanal Bolkiah expressed great sadness at the loss of life and destruction in China.
601:"exercise extreme caution before merging...It is far better to wait until the discussion period is complete".
171:
1566:
1562:
1014:
711:
258:
1466:
762:
Yes. But here is nothing worthy for keeping. What is the message the reader gets from an information like
701:
657:
1528:
1184:
555:
1616:
1445:
1386:
1316:
1227:
1144:
1091:
1032:
817:
676:
573:
417:
327:
254:
226:
187:
163:
1423:
1266:
1119:
1058:
729:
693:
538:
446:
353:
221:
AfDs typically run 5 days, so let me make a deal: if you merge back within 4 days, I'll withdraw.
1400:
1364:
1167:
1010:
508:
1200:
is a laundry list of quotes which is very repetitive to read. One possible solution I tried out
1542:
1508:
1493:
1462:
1341:
1284:
1242:
1213:
719:
697:
647:
474:
393:
375:
367:- worth at least to merge and redirect back into the parent article; plausible search target.
303:
289:
212:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1523:
1180:
551:
348:, the reactions to the earthquake are not diverse or nuanced. Also, I encourage Otolemur to
70:
1612:
1441:
1382:
1301:
1223:
1140:
1087:
1028:
807:
672:
569:
413:
323:
222:
183:
1162:
article? Why should China's earthquake of comparable casualties makes any differences?--
714:'s talk page for a list of merger items. Some things on this list are quite important.--
519:. Per Dhartung. These announcements are so banal they even do not deserve a redirect. --
1419:
1262:
1159:
1115:
1054:
991:
614:
534:
80:
74:
1377:
information, it would be a worry, but since it's not (see the "short burst" clause of
1072:. These comments are noteworthy, and too extensive for merging into the main article.
1396:
1360:
1163:
1077:
968:
520:
504:
495:
349:
66:
62:
50:
1538:
1504:
1489:
1336:
1280:
1238:
1209:
768:
Germany: German Chancellor Angela Merkel has offered her condolences as well (...).
715:
634:
598:
470:
389:
368:
299:
285:
208:
141:
1437:
1378:
58:
54:
778:
Again: What is the information for the reader? There is none. None, except for
1433:
845:.) Hurricane Katrina even has individual articles for a number of countries (
1596:
984:
910:
884:
747:
607:
1073:
963:
550:- Its a notable subject that's well sourced. I see no reason to delete.
1006:
I personally have worked my ass off for this article to see it kept.
1432:
Again: we are not a repository of random scraps of news. We are not
1086:"Noteworthy"? For the news, maybe, for an encyclopedia, not really.
772:
Thailand: The Thai government sent a letter of condolence to China.'
1196:
or maybe merge in vastly shortened form. The article as it exists
594:
I can't see a consensus in the discussion 'leaning toward a merge'.
61:
issues raised by this case, but are for the most part limited to
1633:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1359:
most of these information may become harder to find later on.
1201:
1197:
831:(at least until a reasonable period of time has passed)
148:
137:
133:
129:
833:: There are other catastrophes with similar articles (
839:
International response to the 2005 Kashmir earthquake
780:The leaders of the pack were sad and offered help.
1522:and incorporate everything back to main article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1643:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1567:2008 Sichuan earthquake#Foreign and domestic aid
346:International reactions to the 2006 Lebanon War
247:International reactions to the 2006 Lebanon War
1563:2008 Sichuan earthquake#Reactions within China
925:Comment: Please see the difference between a
710:I never said I was merging Vatican City. See
8:
49:pertinent policies and guidelines including
843:Reactions to the September 11, 2001 attacks
835:International response to Hurricane Katrina
251:Reactions to the September 11, 2001 attacks
1577:, which was likely the same rationale for
1373:So? How does that concern us? If it were
871:Singaporean response to Hurricane Katrina
863:New Zealand response to Hurricane Katrina
1575:Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake
738:Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake
104:Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake
96:Reactions to the 2008 Sichuan earthquake
1027:Bunch of lists, not very encyclopedic.
847:Canadian response to Hurricane Katrina
875:Swedish response to Hurricane Katrina
867:Russian response to Hurricane Katrina
859:Mexican response to Hurricane Katrina
7:
855:French response to Hurricane Katrina
851:Dutch response to Hurricane Katrina
160:I think it should be deleted!!!!
24:
352:on the part of the nominator. --
1488:. Dell and Olympic Committee.--
690:Delete and definitely not merge
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
696:on this. Did I say delete? --
494:. This is nothing more than a
443:GNU Free Documentation License
1:
937:like in doing something. --
1660:
736:which could be applied to
1636:Please do not modify it.
1621:14:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1607:11:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1547:05:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1533:02:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
1513:23:48, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1498:23:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1471:22:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1450:22:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1440:and argue the contrary.
1428:17:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1405:22:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1391:16:16, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1369:16:05, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1350:09:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
1323:13:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1289:17:36, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1277:Knowledge talk:Recentism
1271:08:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1247:01:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1232:16:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1218:15:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1189:14:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1172:12:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1149:03:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
1124:17:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1096:16:25, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1082:09:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1063:06:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1037:05:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
1019:04:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
999:03:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
973:02:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
947:17:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
921:02:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
895:02:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
823:22:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
793:17:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
758:04:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
724:00:50, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
706:18:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
681:18:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
663:16:25, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
639:15:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
622:15:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
578:18:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
560:13:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
543:09:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
526:09:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
512:07:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
479:05:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
453:04:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
422:05:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
398:04:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
379:04:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
360:02:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
332:04:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
308:00:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
294:00:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
275:00:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
253:etc. While this will be
231:00:12, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
217:23:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
192:23:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
176:06:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
90:20:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
712:2008 Sichuan earthquake
265:Otolemur crassicaudatus
259:2008 Sichuan earthquake
1381:), we need not worry.
533:. Not encyclopedic. --
65:arguments, including
365:Anything but delete
770:And not to forget
1179:. per User CMBJ.
997:
832:
732:essay, it states
620:
350:assume good faith
242:Very Strong Keep:
178:
166:comment added by
88:
1651:
1638:
1605:
1603:
1313:
1307:
1300:as users above--
996:
994:
988:
982:
919:
917:
893:
891:
830:
815:
810:
756:
754:
660:
655:
650:
619:
617:
611:
605:
385:To the nominator
266:
161:
151:
145:
127:
87:
85:
78:
44:The result was
34:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1641:deletion review
1634:
1597:
1590:
1308:
1302:
1269:
1122:
1061:
992:
986:
983:
931:telling bla-bla
911:
904:
885:
878:
813:
808:
748:
741:
658:
653:
648:
615:
609:
606:
264:
147:
118:
102:
99:
81:
79:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1657:
1655:
1646:
1645:
1628:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1474:
1473:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1353:
1352:
1325:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1265:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1191:
1174:
1160:Cyclone Nargis
1153:
1152:
1151:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1118:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1066:
1065:
1057:
1049:
1048:
1040:
1039:
1008:
1007:
1001:
975:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
939:213.155.231.26
898:
897:
825:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
785:213.155.231.26
726:
686:
685:
684:
683:
666:
665:
642:
641:
625:
624:
602:
595:
591:
590:
583:
582:
581:
580:
563:
562:
545:
528:
514:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
447:Metropolitan90
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
403:
402:
401:
400:
362:
354:Metropolitan90
337:
336:
335:
334:
319:
313:
312:
311:
310:
296:
278:
277:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
158:
157:
98:
93:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1656:
1644:
1642:
1637:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1602:
1601:
1595:
1594:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1555:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1530:
1527:
1526:
1521:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1478:Comment/MERGE
1476:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1457:
1456:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1413:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1314:
1311:
1306:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1259:
1256:
1255:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1192:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1011:Richardkselby
1005:
1002:
1000:
995:
990:
989:
979:
976:
974:
970:
966:
965:
959:
956:
955:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
923:
922:
918:
916:
915:
909:
908:
902:
901:
900:
899:
896:
892:
890:
889:
883:
882:
876:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
829:
826:
824:
821:
820:
819:
816:
811:
803:
800:
794:
790:
786:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:
759:
755:
753:
752:
746:
745:
739:
735:
731:
727:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
688:
687:
682:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
664:
661:
656:
651:
644:
643:
640:
637:
636:
630:
627:
626:
623:
618:
613:
612:
603:
600:
596:
593:
592:
588:
585:
584:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
527:
524:
523:
518:
515:
513:
510:
506:
501:
497:
493:
490:
489:
480:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
454:
451:
448:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
395:
391:
386:
382:
381:
380:
377:
373:
370:
366:
363:
361:
358:
355:
351:
347:
342:
339:
338:
333:
329:
325:
320:
317:
316:
315:
314:
309:
305:
301:
297:
295:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
267:
260:
256:
255:WP:OTHERSTUFF
252:
248:
243:
240:
239:
232:
228:
224:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
205:
201:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
179:
177:
173:
169:
168:222.152.79.31
165:
155:
150:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
97:
94:
92:
91:
86:
84:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1635:
1632:
1627:
1599:
1598:
1592:
1591:
1570:
1569:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1458:
1415:
1375:encyclopedic
1374:
1356:
1335:
1331:
1330:per nom, or
1327:
1317:
1309:
1304:
1297:
1257:
1193:
1176:
1155:
1110:
1069:
1043:
1024:
1009:
1003:
985:
977:
962:
957:
934:
930:
926:
913:
912:
906:
905:
887:
886:
880:
879:
827:
818:(yada, yada)
806:
805:
801:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
750:
749:
743:
742:
733:
730:WP:RECENTISM
698:Matthiasb-DE
694:WP:RECENTISM
689:
633:
628:
608:
586:
547:
530:
521:
516:
499:
491:
438:
384:
364:
340:
262:
241:
203:
199:
180:
159:
82:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1525:OhanaUnited
1416:Strong Keep
1181:Gollenaiven
828:Strong Keep
552:Umbralcorax
548:Strong Keep
162:—Preceding
51:WP:NOT#NEWS
1613:Biruitorul
1442:Biruitorul
1434:LexisNexis
1383:Biruitorul
1224:Biruitorul
1141:Biruitorul
1088:Biruitorul
1029:Merumerume
673:Biruitorul
570:Biruitorul
414:Biruitorul
324:Biruitorul
223:Biruitorul
184:Biruitorul
83:Sandstein
1420:Mertozoro
1332:Transwiki
1194:Weak keep
935:respúonse
774:and even
535:Kleinzach
500:pro forma
496:directory
71:WP:EFFORT
1397:Benjwong
1361:Benjwong
1164:Computor
929:like in
927:reaction
646:faith.--
522:Eleassar
505:Dhartung
164:unsigned
154:View log
1600:C M B J
1583:Kashmir
1579:Katrina
1554:Comment
1539:haha169
1505:haha169
1490:haha169
1482:Merging
1337:wwwwolf
1281:Kingdon
1263:doktorb
1258:Comment
1239:haha169
1210:Kingdon
1116:doktorb
1111:Comment
1055:doktorb
978:Comment
914:C M B J
888:C M B J
751:C M B J
728:On the
716:haha169
649:Phoenix
635:Sceptre
471:haha169
390:haha169
369:Pegasus
300:haha169
286:haha169
209:haha169
121:protect
116:history
75:WP:LOSE
46:delete.
1585:, and
1520:Delete
1346:growls
1328:Delete
1025:Delete
814:crewer
802:Delete
629:Delete
587:Delete
531:Delete
517:Delete
492:Delete
450:(talk)
357:(talk)
341:Delete
149:delete
125:delete
67:WP:WAX
63:WP:ATA
1342:barks
1267:words
1120:words
1059:words
987:Chzz
610:Chzz
599:WP:GD
204:Merge
152:) – (
142:views
134:watch
130:links
16:<
1617:talk
1587:9/11
1565:and
1559:from
1543:talk
1509:talk
1494:talk
1467:talk
1463:Taku
1459:Keep
1446:talk
1438:WP:N
1424:talk
1401:talk
1387:talk
1379:WP:N
1365:talk
1357:Keep
1298:Keep
1285:talk
1243:talk
1228:talk
1214:talk
1206:here
1204:and
1202:here
1185:talk
1177:Keep
1168:talk
1156:Keep
1145:talk
1092:talk
1078:talk
1070:Keep
1044:Keep
1033:talk
1015:talk
1004:Keep
969:talk
958:Keep
943:talk
933:and
809:brew
789:talk
766:and
720:talk
702:talk
677:talk
659:wiki
574:talk
556:talk
539:talk
509:Talk
475:talk
445:. --
418:talk
394:talk
328:talk
304:talk
290:talk
271:talk
227:talk
213:talk
200:Wait
188:talk
172:talk
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
59:WP:N
55:WP:N
53:and
1312:god
1303:The
1198:now
1074:Axl
964:DGG
498:of
1619:)
1593:—
1589:.
1581:,
1571:to
1545:)
1511:)
1503:--
1496:)
1486:ie
1469:)
1448:)
1426:)
1403:)
1389:)
1367:)
1348:)
1321:)
1310:AR
1305:FE
1287:)
1279:.
1245:)
1237:--
1230:)
1216:)
1187:)
1170:)
1147:)
1094:)
1080:)
1035:)
1017:)
993:►
971:)
945:)
907:—
881:—
873:,
869:,
865:,
861:,
857:,
853:,
849:,
841:,
837:,
791:)
783:--
744:—
740:.
722:)
704:)
679:)
616:►
576:)
558:)
541:)
507:|
477:)
439:If
420:)
396:)
388:--
376:T»
372:«C
330:)
306:)
292:)
284:--
273:)
249:,
229:)
215:)
207:--
190:)
174:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
73:,
69:,
1615:(
1541:(
1507:(
1492:(
1465:(
1444:(
1422:(
1399:(
1385:(
1363:(
1344:/
1340:(
1318:Ч
1315:(
1283:(
1241:(
1226:(
1212:(
1183:(
1166:(
1143:(
1090:(
1076:(
1031:(
1013:(
967:(
941:(
787:(
718:(
700:(
675:(
654:-
572:(
554:(
537:(
473:(
416:(
392:(
374:¦
326:(
302:(
288:(
269:(
225:(
211:(
202:/
186:(
170:(
156:)
146:(
144:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.