149:, cannot find a single source about this newspaper that isn't a press release or job advertisement. I thought that could be because all its sources are in Norwegian, but the newspaper is written in English, so I'd assume at least one independent English source would mention the newspaper if it were notable?
291:
Thanks again. I have read the WP Spam and COI articles. As far as I can see there are no elements of spam in the article, the same goes for conflict of interest. We have tried to compare the article to "benchmark" newspapers such as The
Guardian, where the language used is more or less the same. I am
339:
that is losing money might seem to meet some of
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability criteria in a time when closings are the rule. Recharge's notability, or that of its parent, might be more evident if Knowledge (XXG) contributors would take the trouble to read the languages relevant to the articles they
214:
Thanks for your comments. I have just contacted our editor-in-cheif Chris Hopson and he will find
English or international sources confirming the launch of Recharge. Meanwhile, I would ask you to consider the fact that NHST Media Group have other global pulications such as
344:
of the parent company. -- That being said, the contributor who appeared above lobbying to keep the article might want to include reference to the controversy over whether starting new media products in the current climate was a smart move.
223:
in our portfolio - both of which are world leaders in editorial coverage in their respective fields (oil/gas and shipping). Please advise me in what to do in this matter. Would you like me to post some online metrics?
292:
more than happy to edit the article or add/remove content, but I would truly appreciate if you could point out exactly what makes the article not valid. Thank you for your kind help.
120:
87:
82:
91:
340:
propose to delete. There are plenty of mentions of
Recharge -- not all sympathetic -- by non-conflicted sources in Norway, including the
174:
136:
74:
17:
369:
36:
315:. This very well might change (even within a few months), in which time the article can be re-created with sources. —
127:
article about a new newspaper, lacks circulation numbers or other assertion of notability (author removed prod) --
321:
354:
325:
283:
258:
207:
178:
158:
140:
56:
368:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
78:
293:
225:
70:
62:
317:
170:
132:
350:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
232:
236:
336:
154:
304:
240:
189:
312:
308:
166:
128:
346:
277:
50:
108:
341:
188:
as above. No sources appear to exist. Possible future notability, but not yet.
150:
270:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
165:
I did a similar search myself and failed to come up with anything. --
362:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
216:
220:
115:
104:
100:
96:
275:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
372:). No further edits should be made to this page.
335:. The launch of a new journalistic product by a
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
231:You might want to try reading
1:
342:keenest Norwegian competitor
299:The correct procedure is to
389:
355:06:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
326:00:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
284:00:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
259:13:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
208:15:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
179:13:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
159:10:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
141:08:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
57:07:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
303:for now, as there are no
365:Please do not modify it.
228:March 16, Oslo | Norway
32:Please do not modify it.
296:March 18, Oslo | Norway
294:User:nicholaytehrani
226:User:nicholaytehrani
71:Recharge newspaper
63:Recharge newspaper
44:The result was
286:
380:
367:
305:reliable sources
280:
274:
272:
256:
253:
250:
247:
205:
202:
199:
196:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
388:
387:
383:
382:
381:
379:
378:
377:
376:
370:deletion review
363:
318:LinguistAtLarge
278:
268:
254:
251:
248:
245:
203:
200:
197:
194:
114:
85:
69:
66:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
386:
384:
375:
374:
358:
357:
329:
328:
297:
288:
287:
273:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
241:Andrew Lenahan
211:
210:
190:Andrew Lenahan
182:
181:
162:
161:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
385:
373:
371:
366:
360:
359:
356:
352:
348:
343:
338:
334:
331:
330:
327:
324:
323:
319:
314:
310:
307:available to
306:
302:
298:
295:
290:
289:
285:
282:
281:
271:
267:
266:
260:
257:
242:
239:for a start.
238:
234:
230:
229:
227:
222:
218:
213:
212:
209:
206:
191:
187:
184:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
364:
361:
333:Don't delete
332:
316:
300:
276:
269:
244:
193:
185:
146:
126:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
337:media group
313:notability
311:claims to
221:Tradewinds
217:Upstream
175:contribs
167:BeezHive
137:contribs
129:BeezHive
121:View log
347:Mstarli
279:MBisanz
233:WP:SPAM
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
309:verify
301:delete
237:WP:COI
186:Delete
147:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
151:Somno
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
351:talk
322:Talk
235:and
219:and
171:talk
155:talk
133:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
252:bli
201:bli
353:)
345:--
320:•
255:nd
249:ar
246:St
243:-
204:nd
198:ar
195:St
192:-
177:)
157:)
139:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
349:(
173:|
169:(
153:(
135:|
131:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.