236:- yeah, it's basically a small residential community centred around a "loop" (the street of the same name) and a side-street that doesn't seem to have a name. I'm not sure that it rises to the level of a populated settlement (the likes of which are generally considered notable). It might be considered a sub-suburb (of sorts) by local real estate agents but that's probably not enough, unless someone can substantiate that anyone official considers it a separate suburb.
453:"would you expect someone to type 'Rectory Square' into Knowledge (XXG)" - the existence of Rectory Square in London doesn't make the others less valid search terms, and if all that's required is evidence of existence should there be a disambiguation page for this (and for any other ambiguous street name)?
354:
Validity of a search term on a property site is no indication that it's suitable for an encyclopedia. If it was, it would be reasonable to have disambiguation links to other streets with the name, as although not primary topics they would be equally valid due to mentions on the same or similar sites.
436:, so we don't use them for articles, but can validate the existence of something in another. But the basic litmus test is, "would you expect someone to type 'Rectory Square' into Knowledge (XXG)". I think you would.
337:. Nevertheless, a google search for "Rectory Square" brings up primarily sources for this street (mostly property related), so it's a valid search term. AFAIK every hit in the first four pages was to do with this.
169:
122:
313:) but the street doesn't appear to be, unless additional coverage can be found in sources not available online, and the only verifiable information in the article is its location.
410:
Search results can be explained by the number of properties for sale or rent advertised on property sites. What makes this
Rectory Square a valid search term? Are the others?
163:
258:
355:
There is also no mention of the street in the
Stepney Green article. It's possible that it could be, but Rectory Square is as likely to be mentioned in the
129:
204:
as it is about a residential street in London with no notable buildings, events or residents. No google hits other than property for sale etc.
95:
90:
17:
99:
446:
403:
347:
220:
82:
309:
There's no evidence that it's a neighbourhood, only a street and a square. One of the buildings there is notable (the former
184:
151:
489:
40:
145:
462:
448:
419:
405:
368:
349:
322:
310:
300:
270:
249:
227:
141:
64:
86:
485:
458:
415:
364:
318:
242:
36:
385:. You don't need to get to the same level of notability for a redirect, you just need the term covered
191:
444:
401:
359:
article - it's where the church pictured in that article (but not mentioned in the text) is located.
345:
214:
78:
70:
177:
334:
281:
424:
Knowledge (XXG) has redirects all over the place. Have a look for them. And property sites are
296:
266:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
484:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
454:
411:
360:
314:
237:
157:
201:
437:
394:
338:
205:
425:
55:
329:
292:
262:
116:
333:. It's a street, not a place so it can't be given a free pass at notability per
284:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
52:. Whether to redirect, and where to, is a separate matter and up to editors.
356:
478:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
112:
108:
104:
176:
291:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
492:). No further edits should be made to this page.
389:such that it is correctly sourced to belong in
8:
259:list of England-related deletion discussions
257:Note: This debate has been included in the
256:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
428:, just that they show a property
381:I mean it's a valid search term
1:
463:17:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
449:15:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
420:15:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
406:12:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
369:19:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
350:10:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
323:16:37, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
301:01:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
271:03:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
250:05:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
228:00:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
65:20:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
509:
481:Please do not modify it.
200:Does not appear to meet
32:Please do not modify it.
311:East London Synagogue
383:on Knowledge (XXG)
48:The result was
432:, rather than is
303:
273:
226:
222:see my reflection
216:sharpen the razor
63:
500:
483:
442:
426:reliable sources
399:
343:
290:
286:
246:
223:
217:
212:
210:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
508:
507:
503:
502:
501:
499:
498:
497:
496:
490:deletion review
479:
438:
395:
339:
279:
244:
221:
215:
206:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
506:
504:
495:
494:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
374:
373:
372:
371:
325:
306:
305:
304:
288:
287:
276:
275:
274:
253:
252:
198:
197:
134:
79:Rectory Square
73:
71:Rectory Square
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
505:
493:
491:
487:
482:
476:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
450:
447:
445:
443:
441:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
404:
402:
400:
398:
392:
388:
384:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
352:
351:
348:
346:
344:
342:
336:
332:
331:
330:Stepney Green
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
302:
298:
294:
289:
285:
283:
278:
277:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
251:
248:
247:
241:
240:
235:
232:
231:
230:
229:
224:
218:
211:
209:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
480:
477:
439:
433:
429:
396:
390:
386:
382:
340:
328:Redirect to
327:
280:
243:
238:
233:
207:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
455:PeterĀ James
412:PeterĀ James
361:PeterĀ James
315:PeterĀ James
234:Weak delete
164:free images
440:Ritchie333
397:Ritchie333
341:Ritchie333
208:Baldy Bill
58:Sandstein
486:talk page
393:article.
387:somewhere
335:WP:NPLACE
263:ā¢ Gene93k
37:talk page
488:or in a
357:New Quay
282:Relisted
239:Stalwart
123:View log
39:or in a
434:notable
293:LlamaAl
170:WPĀ refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
430:exists
202:WP:GNG
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
459:talk
416:talk
391:some
365:talk
319:talk
297:talk
267:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
245:111
192:TWL
121:ā (
461:)
418:)
367:)
321:)
299:)
269:)
261:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
457:(
414:(
363:(
317:(
295:(
265:(
225:)
219:|
213:(
196:)
188:Ā·
182:Ā·
174:Ā·
167:Ā·
161:Ā·
155:Ā·
149:Ā·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:Ā·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.