445:
Just so it's clear, I did search Google News and I looked at the hits, or I wouldn't have phrased it as I did in the nom. Perhaps my search should have been broader, although I'm not sure I would have accepted some of the sources you've found and added to the article as reliable sources (biased blogs
823:
I've added even more references. This book has been covered in a wide range of publications and has spawned films and a series of conferences. It keeps cropping up in discussions of
Gingrich's work. The book is notable on its own, but together with the media coverage of the adaptations and the
665:
sources "...second book in the series premiered in
September 2009 at the Washington Visitor Center, hosted by the author and his wife", and none of these are used to cite commentary or analysis), but know that both sides of a "politcial spectrum" are required for
590:,Gingrich is of course notable, but not at the level that every book he's ever written should be on WP, nor every media project he's ever been involved in. The sources recently added are biased blogs and op-eds as the nominator pointed out, these are serious
163:
468:
topic of any source, just so long as the topic is written of in a more-than-trivial manner.. and "mention" of other aspects of
Gingrich's life would most certainly be expected considering his background. I looked beyond
797:
850:, but they are so deeply intertwined, I felt it best to encourage and support them being covered together in one location, figuring it best to have one comprehensive article than two that are less so.
728:
460:
No aspersion toward the nominator, only a statement for those who will visit this AFD later. My comment was toward the article sitting far too long unimproved, and to address that when something
674:
politician, so naturally sources will speak about the man and his ideology in their analysis and commentary about his works. I suppose we could dig and find German or
Italian or French non-
774:
157:
678:
sources to help cite the article. We do not write about EVERY book or project with which
Gingrich is connected... but when one of them catches enough atttention of the media to meet
705:
215:
118:
751:
198:. Naturally, because the author is Gingrich, it has been mentioned in news articles, but more about Gingrich than about the book itself. Could be redirected to Gingrich.
631:
has itself been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself, and these include published works in
91:
86:
123:
95:
78:
401:
244:
278:. I didn't notice the series article, or I would have nominated it for deletion also. The series is no more notable than each individual component.--
446:
and op-eds). I have no objection to keeping the article if that's the consensus, but I didn't nominate it for lack of quality or lack of sourcing.--
408:
determined by coverage, the book and the documentaries are so deeply intertwined that is best to have them all togerther at one location. As for
552:
Happy to do so and to show the results of my few edits. The article first created in 2007 and the unsourced, two-paragraph stub, as originally
178:
145:
902:
889:
367:
305:
910:
17:
661:
source simply cites "is a book written by former House
Speaker Newt Gingrich with photography from his wife Callista Gingrich", and
82:
671:
929:
897:
876:
862:
833:
812:
789:
766:
743:
720:
694:
614:
568:
547:
533:
455:
436:
388:
371:
342:
309:
287:
266:
251:
229:
207:
139:
60:
420:, so soucable notability is not in doubt for either topic. Improving the articles will simply require a bit of work... and
379:
NYT bestseller. The worst case is that we'd merge into one of the articles about the authors or their production company.
645:
485:
135:
74:
66:
948:
40:
491:
185:
628:
859:
809:
786:
763:
740:
717:
691:
565:
530:
433:
464:
be improved, it serves the project to do so. Per WP:GNG, there is no requirement that the book or film be the
384:
906:
893:
839:
829:
651:
610:
363:
301:
262:
151:
944:
925:
338:
36:
421:
852:
802:
779:
756:
733:
710:
684:
558:
523:
426:
511:
380:
171:
843:
323:
825:
606:
517:
359:
297:
258:
624:
620:
587:
195:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
943:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
667:
417:
405:
397:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
921:
657:
596:
479:
334:
847:
679:
640:
591:
413:
53:
543:
451:
283:
203:
643:
to determine if they are suitable or not in context to what is being sourced (along with
409:
247:
into this. EDIT: Some more references: Here's the
Publisher's Weekly review of the book.
872:: great job with expansion. More than enough sources for notability, NYT bestseller. –
635:
forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews.
502:
885:
639:
you find flaws with two if the article's (so far 20) sources, take issue with them at
474:
675:
57:
248:
873:
506:
221:
112:
396:
NYT bestseller. It is through reliable secondary coverage that this topic passes
682:, we can and do. And no... I am not a Republican, nor a fan of things Gingrich.
539:
447:
279:
199:
326:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
473:
before working on the topic. In looking only at what was used to expand and
662:
602:
497:
255:
Culture Wars: An
Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices, Volume 1
937:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
824:
wider interest shown in the subject, it is even more notable. --
586:
Per Nom,the book nor the series meet notability requirements of
355:
842:
for the additional work! I do agree that book and films have
521:
is THE source accepted as suitable for information on films.
798:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
501:
is an
American political journalism organization founded by
52:. Recent additions of references show that this book passes
884:: NYT bestseller, lots of news coverage, clearly satisfies
729:
list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
670:. We are speaking about a bestseller by a conservative
553:
108:
104:
100:
424:
to either of the articles is not cause for deletion.
170:
775:
list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions
477:the article (so far... and there are many more)...
333:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
184:
920:Notable author, notable book. Tons of reference.
706:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
951:). No further edits should be made to this page.
216:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
752:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
796:Note: This debate has been included in the
773:Note: This debate has been included in the
750:Note: This debate has been included in the
727:Note: This debate has been included in the
704:Note: This debate has been included in the
214:Note: This debate has been included in the
538:Thanks for taking the trouble to explain.--
795:
772:
749:
726:
703:
245:Rediscovering God in America (film series)
213:
412:, the connected topics have the expected
594:issues. Especially with these sources :
250:This NYT article has 3 paras on the book
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
406:independent and sourcable notability
489:is an newspaper in South Carolina.
483:is a conservative online magazine.
400:. Although closely related to the
296:I have put it up for deletion. --
24:
253:. There's multiple mentions in
1:
486:The Anderson Independent-Mail
556:did not look too promising.
75:Rediscovering God in America
67:Rediscovering God in America
492:The Harlan Daily Enterprise
422:lacking editorial attention
968:
930:12:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
898:13:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
877:13:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
863:05:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
834:12:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
813:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
790:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
767:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
744:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
721:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
695:04:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
615:01:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
569:01:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
548:00:36, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
534:00:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
456:23:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
437:23:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
389:09:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
372:04:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
343:00:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
310:04:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
288:09:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
267:09:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
230:01:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
208:23:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
61:12:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
629:New York Times bestseller
418:multiple reliable sources
940:Please do not modify it.
495:is a paper in Kentucky.
32:Please do not modify it.
652:Harlan Daily Enterprise
619:By the instructions at
257:by Roger Chapman. --
911:few or no other edits
668:netrality and balance
913:outside this topic.
848:sorcable notability
512:The Washington Post
414:extensive coverage
358:Gingrich???... --
48:The result was
914:
815:
792:
769:
746:
723:
621:WP:NBOOK#Criteria
345:
232:
219:
959:
942:
900:
855:
846:independent and
805:
782:
759:
736:
713:
687:
658:American Thinker
646:Independent-Mail
597:American Thinker
561:
526:
480:American Thinker
429:
404:, any topic has
354:per nom. Who is
332:
328:
220:
189:
188:
174:
126:
116:
98:
34:
967:
966:
962:
961:
960:
958:
957:
956:
955:
949:deletion review
938:
853:
803:
780:
757:
734:
711:
685:
627:, in that this
559:
524:
427:
321:
131:
122:
89:
73:
70:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
965:
963:
954:
953:
933:
932:
915:
879:
867:
866:
865:
817:
816:
793:
770:
747:
724:
700:
699:
698:
697:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
503:John F. Harris
440:
439:
391:
374:
348:
347:
346:
330:
329:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
291:
290:
270:
269:
234:
233:
192:
191:
128:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
964:
952:
950:
946:
941:
935:
934:
931:
927:
923:
919:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:202.124.75.77
899:
895:
891:
890:202.124.75.77
887:
883:
880:
878:
875:
871:
868:
864:
861:
860:
857:
856:
849:
845:
841:
837:
836:
835:
831:
827:
826:Colapeninsula
822:
819:
818:
814:
811:
810:
807:
806:
799:
794:
791:
788:
787:
784:
783:
776:
771:
768:
765:
764:
761:
760:
753:
748:
745:
742:
741:
738:
737:
730:
725:
722:
719:
718:
715:
714:
707:
702:
701:
696:
693:
692:
689:
688:
681:
677:
673:
669:
664:
660:
659:
654:
653:
648:
647:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
612:
608:
607:Newmanoconnor
605:
604:
599:
598:
593:
589:
585:
582:
581:
570:
567:
566:
563:
562:
555:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
532:
531:
528:
527:
520:
519:
514:
513:
508:
504:
500:
499:
494:
493:
488:
487:
482:
481:
476:
472:
467:
463:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
438:
435:
434:
431:
430:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:Alan Liefting
357:
353:
350:
349:
344:
340:
336:
331:
327:
325:
320:
319:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:Alan Liefting
295:
294:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
259:Colapeninsula
256:
252:
249:
246:
243:
239:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
939:
936:
917:
881:
869:
858:
851:
820:
808:
801:
785:
778:
762:
755:
739:
732:
716:
709:
690:
683:
656:
650:
644:
636:
632:
601:
595:
583:
564:
557:
529:
522:
516:
510:
509:formerly of
507:Jim VandeHei
496:
490:
484:
478:
470:
465:
461:
432:
425:
393:
376:
351:
322:
275:
254:
241:
237:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
49:
47:
31:
28:
922:Jared-Phill
909:) has made
335:Ron Ritzman
158:free images
672:Republican
623:it passes
410:notability
945:talk page
554:nominated
222:• Gene93k
37:talk page
947:or in a
854:Schmidt,
804:Schmidt,
781:Schmidt,
758:Schmidt,
735:Schmidt,
712:Schmidt,
686:Schmidt,
676:American
663:Politico
625:WP:NBOOK
603:Politico
588:WP:NBOOK
560:Schmidt,
525:Schmidt,
498:Politico
428:Schmidt,
368:contribs
324:Relisted
306:contribs
196:WP:NBOOK
119:View log
58:sgeureka
39:or in a
821:Comment
518:Variety
398:WP:BOOK
276:Comment
164:WP refs
152:scholar
92:protect
87:history
874:Lionel
844:enough
838:Major
680:WP:GNG
655:, the
641:WP:RSN
592:WP:IRS
584:Delete
515:, and
475:source
381:Warden
352:Delete
194:Fails
136:Google
96:delete
54:WP:GNG
888:. --
840:kudos
540:Bbb23
448:Bbb23
280:Bbb23
242:Merge
200:Bbb23
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
926:talk
918:Keep
907:talk
894:talk
886:WP:N
882:Keep
870:Keep
830:talk
649:and
611:talk
544:talk
505:and
471:hits
466:sole
452:talk
402:film
394:Keep
385:talk
377:Keep
364:talk
356:Newt
339:talk
302:talk
284:talk
263:talk
240:and
238:Keep
226:talk
204:talk
172:FENS
146:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
56:. –
50:keep
633:all
462:can
416:in
186:TWL
121:•
117:– (
928:)
901:—
896:)
832:)
800:.
777:.
754:.
731:.
708:.
637:If
613:)
600:,
546:)
454:)
387:)
370:)
366:-
341:)
308:)
304:-
286:)
265:)
228:)
218:.
206:)
166:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
924:(
905:(
892:(
828:(
609:(
542:(
450:(
383:(
362:(
337:(
300:(
282:(
261:(
224:(
202:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.