164:
295:
If you had the references, you should have placed them in the heart of the article itself to improve it. Nobody bothered to do this--until you came along after I voted. I certainly inspected the article itself...and saw only the company's web site cited as a source. PS: The
Knowledge (XXG) tag about
334:. The failure to find reliable sources for at least a year is a ground for deletion. Putting that aside, the references so far only touch incidentally on the sandals and are more directly relevant to the founders of the company, and so this could only be called a weak keep at best.
252:
An article whose only source is the company's web site is unnotable. Since when is a web site with lovely (model) men and women a reason to keep this article? The claims about the company's founders is not even sourced or verifiable.
313:- clearly notable per a quick perusal of the web. Please take the time to understand the notability guidelines and AfD process before attempting to delete articles for lack of sources (which is not a deletion criterion).
296:
its this company's notability is still on the article itself...which tells me others may share my concerns about its notability. However, I've removed the unreferenced tag due to your good reliable sources. Regards,
274:- Did you even bother searching for references before voting Delete? Did you even bother reading my Keep vote with supporting refs? Just in case, I added a few refs into the article. --
115:
225:
122:
Product or company has no significant coverage in secondary sources. Only passing mention of brand in some newspapers. Fails WP:N. Also written like an advertisement.
195:
194:- per the lovely women they always have in their booths at trade shows. Seriously, they're a top brand in the footwear industry. More sources at
82:
77:
17:
86:
69:
160:
380:
36:
145:
379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
199:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
362:
343:
322:
305:
283:
262:
243:
215:
186:
149:
131:
51:
318:
238:
279:
211:
163:. Ok, ok... keep per being a well-known national brand with a good amount of reliable sources (like
141:
314:
73:
48:
358:
301:
258:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
339:
232:
206:. Many more sources as long as you google for Reef with the name of one of the founders. --
127:
331:
275:
207:
168:
65:
57:
45:
354:
297:
254:
103:
203:
335:
123:
353:
There is enough coverage in reliable sources here to establish notability.
373:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
110:
99:
95:
91:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:). No further edits should be made to this page.
226:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
140:No sources, and no evidence of notability.
224:: This debate has been included in the
44:The result was consensus to keep. —
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
400:
161:WP:I'MWEARINGTHESERIGHTNOW
363:21:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
323:21:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
306:08:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
284:07:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
263:06:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
244:21:36, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
216:15:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
187:14:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
150:13:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
132:12:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
376:Please do not modify it.
344:04:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
330:. Please see point 9 of
52:00:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
196:Transworld Business
246:
229:
391:
378:
241:
235:
230:
220:
204:The Mercury News
200:The Kite Boarder
184:
181:
178:
175:
167:, for example).
113:
107:
89:
34:
399:
398:
394:
393:
392:
390:
389:
388:
387:
381:deletion review
374:
239:
233:
182:
179:
176:
173:
142:UnitedStatesian
109:
80:
64:
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
397:
395:
386:
385:
368:
366:
365:
348:
347:
346:
308:
289:
288:
287:
286:
266:
265:
247:
218:
189:
169:Andrew Lenahan
153:
152:
120:
119:
66:Reef (company)
60:
58:Reef (company)
55:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
396:
384:
382:
377:
371:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
326:
325:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
290:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
251:
248:
245:
242:
236:
227:
223:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
136:
135:
134:
133:
129:
125:
117:
112:
105:
101:
97:
93:
88:
84:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
62:
59:
56:
54:
53:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
375:
372:
367:
350:
327:
310:
292:
271:
249:
221:
191:
172:
156:
137:
121:
43:
31:
28:
234:Fabrictramp
276:Millbrooky
240:talk to me
208:Millbrooky
46:Athaenara
355:Davewild
315:Wikidemo
298:Artene50
255:Artene50
165:this one
116:View log
328:Comment
293:Comment
272:Comment
83:protect
78:history
336:Assize
332:WP:DEL
250:Delete
138:Delete
124:Assize
111:delete
87:delete
114:) – (
104:views
96:watch
92:links
16:<
359:talk
351:Keep
340:talk
319:talk
311:Keep
302:talk
280:talk
259:talk
222:Note
212:talk
202:and
198:and
192:Keep
159:per
157:Keep
146:talk
128:talk
100:logs
74:talk
70:edit
231:--
228:.
180:bli
361:)
342:)
321:)
304:)
282:)
261:)
237:|
214:)
183:nd
177:ar
174:St
171:-
148:)
130:)
102:|
98:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
76:|
72:|
49:✉
357:(
338:(
317:(
300:(
278:(
257:(
210:(
144:(
126:(
118:)
108:(
106:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.