351:
Wiping out an article which covers a whole denomination, per current infobox mention of 70 churches belonging to it, should not be done lightly, even though denominations can rise and fall pretty fast. This seems to be about church split off in
America, not about the split in England, so redirect to
471:
459:
465:
364:, which doesn't load for me but Google snippet shows it is about "The History of the Reformed Church in Virginia 1714-1940 ... entries after 1844 in English and not transcribed." But mention of 70 churches belonging to it seems to suggest it is about a current/recent denomination. --
524:-- The info box implies that this was a Baptist secession from the church in New England. I do not know if that happened, but if it did, I expect we have article on it under another name. If it existed, some one can create an article; I agree the present name is improbable.
414:", which is a reasonably large denomination (north of 100 parishes), with a parish in Richmond, but not headquartered there. We don't seem to have an article for that; note that it's not the same as what we have under the title
181:
486:
I tweaked my !vote to Delete then redirect. The current article is not about what I think would be an appropriate destination and I think there is nothing to keep in the history.
175:
252:
386:
a denomination as described in this infobox. The article you linked from the Loyola website is about
Lutheran and Reformed churches, but in that context, those mean the
134:
272:
232:
324:
as a plausible search term. Leaving aside the textless status of the article, the infobox attributes don't make a lot of sense. A group that separated from the
402:
of other
Presbyterian denominations, but not headquartered in Richmond, and not named "Reformed English"! Indeed, "English" is usually a keyword suggesting an
332:. I suspect this was essentially a infobox sandbox attempt, with some of the information retained from whichever church article it was copied from initially.
107:
102:
111:
356:
is not quite on. Is there a different article about the
Reformation happening in America, which was settled by Europeans already in 1600s? There is
141:
399:
94:
455:
then redirect to
English Reformation. Google books search gives results which link the term to anglican and reformation figures, for instance:
387:
70:
212:
The article has never had any text, only the boxes, and I have located no source with any information about a religious body of this name
196:
163:
17:
508:
439:
337:
157:
325:
98:
550:
533:
516:
490:
477:
443:
373:
341:
308:
284:
264:
244:
224:
76:
395:
361:
153:
567:
419:
391:
304:
280:
260:
240:
40:
435:
415:
333:
203:
65:
529:
90:
82:
362:
http://loyolanotredamelib.org/php/report05/articles/pdfs/Report38Joynerp15-34.pdf, from Loyola Notre Dame
563:
36:
300:
276:
256:
236:
169:
434:). Bottom line, I'm pretty sure the denomination as described in the infobox doesn't exist at all.
353:
321:
296:
189:
60:
57:
53:
398:
in
Richmond). Both of these are much larger denominations than the infobox offers. Now, there are
525:
512:
403:
426:
of these churches are "Strict
Baptist" as the infobox suggests (in either sense; they are not
369:
219:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
562:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
431:
546:
357:
468:
329:
503:
487:
474:
456:
365:
213:
128:
542:
462:
427:
411:
558:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
358:
360:. Searching "Reformed English Church, Virginia" yields
124:
120:
116:
502:- there never was a denomination of this description.
188:
253:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
570:). No further edits should be made to this page.
271:Note: This discussion has been included in the
251:Note: This discussion has been included in the
231:Note: This discussion has been included in the
202:
8:
273:list of England-related deletion discussions
233:list of History-related deletion discussions
422:, and which miiight not be notable. Also,
270:
250:
230:
418:, which I believe should actually be
7:
430:to begin with, and they do not hold
382:The thing is, I don't think there
24:
394:, respectively (the latter has
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
326:Orthodox Presbyterian Church
420:Reformation Anglican Church
587:
560:Please do not modify it.
551:02:44, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
534:08:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
517:04:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
491:02:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
478:21:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
444:16:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
416:Reformed Anglican Church
412:Reformed Anglican Church
374:15:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
342:15:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
309:12:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
285:12:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
265:12:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
245:12:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
225:09:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
77:04:30, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
91:Reformed English Church
83:Reformed English Church
436:Squeamish Ossifrage
354:English Reformation
334:Squeamish Ossifrage
322:English Reformation
297:English Reformation
54:English Reformation
50:delete and redirect
287:
267:
247:
578:
500:Delete as a hoax
432:closed communion
222:
207:
206:
192:
144:
132:
114:
73:
68:
63:
34:
586:
585:
581:
580:
579:
577:
576:
575:
574:
568:deletion review
424:absolutely none
301:The Mighty Glen
277:The Mighty Glen
257:The Mighty Glen
237:The Mighty Glen
220:
149:
140:
105:
89:
86:
71:
66:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
584:
582:
573:
572:
554:
553:
536:
519:
496:
495:
494:
493:
481:
480:
469:Thomas Cranmer
449:
448:
447:
446:
406:church. There
377:
376:
345:
344:
330:Strict Baptist
311:
289:
288:
268:
248:
210:
209:
146:
85:
80:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
583:
571:
569:
565:
561:
556:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
535:
531:
527:
526:Peterkingiron
523:
520:
518:
514:
510:
507:
506:
501:
498:
497:
492:
489:
485:
484:
483:
482:
479:
476:
472:
470:
466:
464:
460:
458:
457:Francis Paget
454:
451:
450:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
350:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:would not be
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
223:
218:
217:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
147:
143:
139:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
84:
81:
79:
78:
74:
69:
64:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
559:
557:
538:
521:
504:
499:
452:
423:
407:
396:its seminary
383:
348:
317:
313:
292:
215:
211:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
137:
49:
47:
31:
28:
295:synonym to
176:free images
463:John Jewel
564:talk page
541:as hoax.
37:talk page
566:or in a
488:Smmurphy
475:Smmurphy
428:Baptists
404:Anglican
392:PC (USA)
318:redirect
293:Redirect
135:View log
39:or in a
366:Doncram
349:Comment
221:(talk),
216:Noyster
182:WP refs
170:scholar
108:protect
103:history
58:King of
539:Delete
522:Delete
509:Anselm
467:, and
453:Delete
314:Delete
154:Google
112:delete
543:Srnec
197:JSTOR
158:books
142:Stats
129:views
121:watch
117:links
16:<
547:talk
530:talk
513:talk
440:talk
400:lots
390:and
388:ELCA
370:talk
338:talk
305:talk
281:talk
261:talk
241:talk
190:FENS
164:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
410:a "
320:to
316:or
204:TWL
133:– (
52:to
549:)
532:)
515:)
505:St
473:.
461:,
442:)
408:is
384:is
372:)
340:)
307:)
299:.
283:)
275:.
263:)
255:.
243:)
235:.
214::
184:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
75:♠
56:.
545:(
528:(
511:(
438:(
368:(
336:(
303:(
279:(
259:(
239:(
208:)
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
148:(
145:)
138:·
131:)
93:(
72:♣
67:♦
62:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.