Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Regnum Online - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

241:
I have greatly reduced the article, reducing unnecessary detail, abandoning it's former manual and crystal ball style. Next time I post a new article I'll be sure to add sources at the very beginning to avoid these kind of issues. Though it angered me at first, I admit this whole discussion helped me
228:
to me, or getting pretty close to it at any rate. The game is new, so more coverage is likely. Somebody put a lot of work into the article, I'm not convinced that the subject is sufficiently lacking in notability to just toss that.
162:
I'm afraid none are valid sources AFAIK, due to the fact they are mere databases with no limitations on who can list themselves on it. We need actual genuine non-trivial media coverage. (And the article is still appalling anyway.)
242:
improve my style. I hope the article is not deleted. Thanks for both positive and negative criticism. I still think improvements should be proposed in the discussion page before inserting a speedy deletion notice.
128:
an instruction manual/game guide (just look at combat section to see what I mean) The article also smacks of crystal balling with a couple of sections stating 'Information on this cannot be disclosed at this
142: 198:
Of course, you need not speak spanish, but the article does cite independent sources. As for the manual style, I shall eliminate detail. I'll be back in a while and work on it.
189:
Well excuse me for not speaking spanish for some bizarre reason. And the onus of collaboration falls on peole who want the article kept. That's not me, or anyone else so far.
254:- OK, from what I could gather from bad translations of the spanish, it does indeed seem notable, so I've changed to a keep (and the article is much better now!) 180:) and a television news coverage (Telenoche). The article may need cleanup or to get shorter, but instead of deleting it, it may need collaborations. 124:- Fails all web guidelines, no independant third party coverage, article seems to go into way too much detail, not to mention being a poster child for 93:— Google results are all blogs or forums or beta download sites. A game played over the internet would be expected to have some coverage on websites. 266:- It seems to be fairly well-written and formatted, and has just about enough reliable sources to pass WEB. Time should provide a few more. 291:. Just because someone hasn't heard of it doesn't mean it isn't notable. While mainly a Latin game, I still feel this needs to stay. 17: 220:, which appears to be a high-end general news site (whether they have a print edition I don't know), a video segment on 322: 224:, which appears to be a local news channel (maybe its national), as well as more game-oriented media. That sounds like 36: 272: 321:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
307: 295: 278: 258: 246: 233: 202: 193: 184: 167: 149: 135: 114: 97: 85: 68: 52: 292: 49: 255: 190: 164: 146: 132: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
230: 288: 225: 125: 78: 304: 243: 199: 181: 156: 111: 94: 58: 65: 172:
I'm sorry to disagree, but between the spanish sources there are 2 newspapers (
267: 82: 108:
Fails Web guidelines, no assertion of notability, no substantiating Ghits.
315:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221: 155:
I have added several coverage articles about the game at the
217: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 325:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 141:Note: This debate has been added to the 303:per commentary, and contra to nom. -- 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 77:- no assertion of notability. Fails 24: 159:section. Please check them out. 287:- Seems notable enough to pass 1: 308:04:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 296:02:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 279:22:23, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 259:21:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 247:17:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 234:16:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 203:16:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 194:16:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 185:16:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 168:15:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 150:15:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 136:15:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 115:14:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 98:12:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 86:06:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 69:05:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC) 64:Procedural, contested speedy 131:See below for new thinking. 53:04:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 342: 318:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 143:list of CVG deletions 122:Strong, Speedy Delete 81:. Borderline speedy. 110:Withdrawing vote. 281: 333: 320: 293:guitarhero777777 276: 216:It's covered by 152: 34: 341: 340: 336: 335: 334: 332: 331: 330: 329: 323:deletion review 316: 275: 140: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 339: 337: 328: 327: 311: 310: 298: 282: 271: 261: 249: 236: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 196: 157:External links 153: 138: 101: 100: 88: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 338: 326: 324: 319: 313: 312: 309: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 290: 286: 283: 280: 274: 269: 265: 262: 260: 257: 256:The Kinslayer 253: 250: 248: 245: 240: 237: 235: 232: 227: 223: 219: 215: 212: 204: 201: 197: 195: 192: 191:The Kinslayer 188: 187: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 170: 169: 166: 165:The Kinslayer 161: 160: 158: 154: 151: 148: 147:The Kinslayer 144: 139: 137: 134: 133:The Kinslayer 130: 127: 123: 119: 118: 117: 116: 113: 109: 107: 106:Speedy Delete 99: 96: 92: 89: 87: 84: 80: 76: 73: 72: 71: 70: 67: 60: 59:Regnum Online 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 317: 314: 300: 284: 263: 251: 238: 213: 177: 173: 121: 120: 105: 103: 102: 90: 74: 63: 45: 43: 31: 28: 231:Herostratus 305:Dennisthe2 244:Jcpetruzza 222:Channel 13 200:Jcpetruzza 182:Jcpetruzza 174:La Razón 112:Eusebeus 95:Demiurge 218:Larazon 178:Infobae 129:timre.' 50:W.marsh 289:WP:WEB 226:WP:WEB 126:WP:NOT 91:Delete 79:WP:WEB 75:Delete 66:Tawker 268:GeeJo 239:Keep. 214:Keep. 83:MER-C 16:< 301:Keep 285:Keep 264:Keep 252:Keep 176:and 46:keep 273:(c) 277:• 145:. 48:. 270:⁄ 104:*

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
04:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Regnum Online
Tawker
05:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:WEB
MER-C
06:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Demiurge
12:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Eusebeus
14:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:NOT
The Kinslayer
15:41, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
list of CVG deletions
The Kinslayer
15:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
External links
The Kinslayer
15:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Jcpetruzza
16:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
The Kinslayer
16:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Jcpetruzza
16:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Larazon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.