373:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
378:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
377:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
207:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
347:
sufficient material for notability . the only apparent bases for this nomination would seem to be either that being a
Playmate confers permanent non-notability regardless of any subsequent career, or that the articles were not even looked at individually,
165:
321:
369:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
126:
196:
159:
273:
253:
62:
250:
17:
99:
94:
103:
237:
86:
180:
374:
147:
411:
36:
233:
382:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
410:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
308:
141:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
396:
359:
336:
312:
288:
265:
241:
219:
137:
68:
385:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
187:
300:
304:
173:
52:
49:
370:
90:
392:
332:
284:
261:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379:
229:
153:
213:
380:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
355:
82:
74:
388:
328:
280:
257:
120:
212:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
350:
299:- Playmate of the Year award plus multiple mainstream credits satisfy
404:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
322:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
116:
112:
108:
172:
186:
197:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
414:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
320:Note: This debate has been included in the
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:even without regard to her Playboy credits.
274:list of People-related deletion discussions
319:
271:
249:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
431:
337:23:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
313:23:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
289:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
266:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
242:02:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
220:01:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
407:Please do not modify it.
208:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
397:14:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
360:05:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
251:WikiProject Pornography
69:17:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
234:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
201:Playmate of the Month
228:. Clearly satisfies
205:Playmate of the Year
375:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
387:
339:
325:
291:
277:
254:list of deletions
217:
422:
409:
383:
326:
278:
268:
215:
191:
190:
176:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
418:
412:deletion review
405:
367:Procedural Keep
248:
199:. Being chosen
133:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
417:
416:
400:
399:
363:
362:
341:
340:
316:
315:
305:Morbidthoughts
293:
292:
269:
245:
244:
194:
193:
130:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
415:
413:
408:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
381:
376:
372:
368:
365:
364:
361:
357:
353:
352:
346:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
323:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
275:
270:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
211:
206:
202:
198:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:Renee Tenison
80:
79:
76:
75:Renee Tenison
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
406:
403:
384:
366:
349:
344:
296:
225:
210:playmatehood
209:
204:
200:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
45:
43:
31:
28:
160:free images
301:WP:PORNBIO
371:WP:BEFORE
329:• Gene93k
281:• Gene93k
258:• Gene93k
127:View log
389:Carrite
214:Damiens
166:WP refs
154:scholar
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
230:WP:ENT
138:Google
104:delete
356:talk
181:JSTOR
142:books
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
393:talk
345:Keep
333:talk
309:talk
297:Keep
285:talk
262:talk
238:talk
226:Keep
174:FENS
148:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
46:keep
351:DGG
327:--
216:.rf
203:or
188:TWL
125:– (
395:)
358:)
335:)
324:.
311:)
303:.
287:)
276:.
264:)
256:.
240:)
168:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
391:(
354:(
331:(
307:(
283:(
279:—
260:(
236:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.