522:. Could the deletion-nominator please remind us of an alternative treatment possible, which was the result implemented in several similar AFDs. I have seen other AFDs about London embassies, and have seen several of them conclude with move or redirect to some obvious target, but I forget what that is. Perhaps there is a standard type of article on the nation-to-nation relationship, which has not always been created, but is obviously a keeper, and this should be moved/redirected to that. It seems inefficient for new AFD editors to have to consider this kind of issue again and again, without guidance. I'm sorry I can't remember the specifics just now. --
798:
article. This is best way to resolve the AFD easily, without deleting contribution(s), without offending contributor(s), and leading to more productive development. IMHO the AFD is not needed; it would have been possible to simply make the move and develop a bit, without imposing costs of AFD (possible offense to contributors, use/waste of AFD editors' attention, etc.). Hope this helps. --
606:
602:
820:
people couldn't even be bothered contributing to the discussion, even when pinged to reconsider previous opinions. I'll support a redirection/merger once that target article exists. Until then, this doesn't meet our inclusion criteria and should be deleted as no genuine alternative to deletion exists.
819:
That's fine and I'd be happy with that solution once that article is created. So many of these ended as no consensus because they deserved to be deleted but nobody could be bothered to create the articles to redirect them to. I created a couple of them and still the AFDs ended as no consensus because
797:
and then the embassy article would be a redirect to that and the embassy could be mentioned, or not. If/when the embassy is itself found to be more individually notable, say for occupying some historic building or having some important event there, then re-develop the redirect into a separate
579:
as examples. I was frustrated that articles for non-notable embassies had been created while articles about notable relations remained redlinks. I don't support keeping these unless those articles are created - feel free to do so and I'll happily support your suggestion.
93:
194:
705:
644:
766:
88:
494:
of that territory isn't notable. What has been suggested is that a nondescript office representing that
Government in another country isn't inherently notable. Like everything else, it needs to meet
576:
188:
699:
343:
120:
115:
638:
124:
760:
154:
107:
287:
571:
The alternative to a couple of the others was that I created bilateral relations articles and they were redirected there. In other cases, others have created them. I created
572:
609:, including how Montserrat is some type of overseas territory of the United Kingdom and how the U.K. considers its relations, in 2002, and I assume lots more sources from:
147:
323:
251:
225:
fails WP:ORG. this does not even have embassy or consulate status. And it is only an office within the building pictured not the whole building. Also nominating:
857:
832:
814:
592:
562:
538:
510:
483:
465:
444:
420:
405:
383:
355:
335:
315:
279:
243:
72:
453:
111:
209:
176:
720:
687:
375:
841:, and edited partway towards being on revised topic name. Keeps photo of the embassy. I think this AFD can be closed keep / redirected. --
659:
103:
78:
781:
626:
838:
748:
598:
170:
681:
166:
677:
452:
I believe the official government of a
British overseas territory is notable. Other non-sovereign representations, such as the
17:
620:
216:
742:
304:
268:
229:
727:
852:
809:
557:
533:
616:
738:
666:
182:
788:
432:
both - neither is a notable building, institution or organisation given that neither meets our inclusion criteria.
884:
693:
379:
40:
309:
273:
632:
754:
880:
36:
351:
774:
713:
652:
202:
299:
263:
601:
or any other okay name for the bilateral relations and develop a little bit, e.g. perhaps from
546:
or merge to the standard type of article that has resolved many similar London embassy AFDs. --
56:
closing after collegial discussion and equally bold redirect made any further discussion moot (
847:
804:
552:
528:
479:
416:
371:
331:
239:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
879:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
822:
582:
500:
434:
62:
461:
401:
347:
53:
495:
367:
292:
256:
57:
842:
799:
547:
523:
475:
412:
327:
235:
141:
457:
397:
94:
Articles for deletion/Representative of
Montserrat, London (2nd nomination)
456:
have articles here. I don't see why this should be an exception. --
603:
this google book about
Montserrat and England dynamics of culture
873:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
89:
Articles for deletion/Representative of
Montserrat, London
607:
this source about
Montserrat and United Kingdom relations
577:
Saint
Vincent and the Grenadines–United Kingdom relations
498:
and in this case doesn't. Did you even read the article?
344:
list of
Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions
137:
133:
129:
773:
712:
651:
597:
Thanks. Okay then with this AFD, move the article to
488:
And... what? Nobody (nobody at all) is suggesting the
201:
288:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
474:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for keeping.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
887:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:Saint Kitts and Nevis–United Kingdom relations
324:list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions
787:
726:
665:
215:
8:
342:Note: This debate has been included in the
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
286:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:list of England-related deletion discussions
250:Note: This debate has been included in the
341:
321:
285:
249:
86:
230:Representative of Saint Helena, London
7:
104:Representative of Montserrat, London
79:Representative of Montserrat, London
839:Montserrat-United Kingdom relations
599:Montserrat-United Kingdom relations
454:Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office
85:
24:
394:Please make an account to vote.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
858:21:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
833:02:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
815:01:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
593:22:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
563:21:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
539:21:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
511:22:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
484:14:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
466:13:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
445:00:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
421:14:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
411:anon IP voting is permitted,
406:13:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
384:10:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
356:11:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
73:23:24, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
336:00:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
316:13:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
280:13:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
244:12:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
904:
876:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
84:AfDs for this article:
408:
358:
338:
318:
282:
58:non-admin closure
895:
878:
855:
850:
845:
829:
827:
812:
807:
802:
792:
791:
777:
731:
730:
716:
670:
669:
655:
589:
587:
560:
555:
550:
536:
531:
526:
507:
505:
441:
439:
392:
314:
297:
278:
261:
220:
219:
205:
157:
145:
127:
69:
67:
34:
903:
902:
898:
897:
896:
894:
893:
892:
891:
885:deletion review
874:
853:
848:
843:
837:Okay, moved to
825:
823:
810:
805:
800:
734:
673:
612:
585:
583:
558:
553:
548:
534:
529:
524:
503:
501:
437:
435:
376:180.172.239.231
293:
291:
257:
255:
162:
153:
118:
102:
99:
82:
65:
63:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
901:
899:
890:
889:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
795:
794:
793:
732:
671:
566:
565:
541:
516:
515:
514:
513:
486:
469:
468:
447:
426:
425:
424:
423:
409:
387:
386:
360:
359:
339:
319:
283:
233:
232:
223:
222:
159:
98:
97:
96:
91:
83:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
900:
888:
886:
882:
877:
871:
870:
859:
856:
851:
846:
840:
836:
835:
834:
831:
830:
818:
817:
816:
813:
808:
803:
796:
790:
786:
783:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
762:
759:
756:
753:
750:
747:
744:
740:
737:
736:Find sources:
733:
729:
725:
722:
719:
715:
711:
707:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
689:
686:
683:
679:
676:
675:Find sources:
672:
668:
664:
661:
658:
654:
650:
646:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
628:
625:
622:
618:
615:
614:Find sources:
611:
610:
608:
604:
600:
596:
595:
594:
591:
590:
578:
574:
570:
569:
568:
567:
564:
561:
556:
551:
545:
542:
540:
537:
532:
527:
521:
518:
517:
512:
509:
508:
497:
493:
492:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:
471:
470:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
448:
446:
443:
442:
431:
428:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
381:
377:
374:is notable.--
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
340:
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
317:
313:
312:
308:
307:
303:
302:
298:
296:
289:
284:
281:
277:
276:
272:
271:
267:
266:
262:
260:
253:
248:
247:
246:
245:
241:
237:
231:
228:
227:
226:
218:
214:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
164:Find sources:
160:
156:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
95:
92:
90:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
70:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
875:
872:
821:
784:
778:
770:
763:
757:
751:
745:
735:
723:
717:
709:
702:
696:
690:
684:
674:
662:
656:
648:
641:
635:
629:
623:
613:
581:
543:
519:
499:
490:
489:
449:
433:
429:
393:
368:organization
366:Neither the
363:
310:
305:
300:
294:
274:
269:
264:
258:
234:
224:
212:
206:
198:
191:
185:
179:
173:
163:
150:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
761:free images
700:free images
639:free images
189:free images
491:government
348:Necrothesp
881:talk page
328:• Gene93k
311:GuestBook
275:GuestBook
37:talk page
883:or in a
544:Redirect
520:Question
372:building
370:nor the
306:Contribs
295:Ascii002
270:Contribs
259:Ascii002
148:View log
50:redirect
39:or in a
767:WP refs
755:scholar
706:WP refs
694:scholar
645:WP refs
633:scholar
476:LibStar
413:LibStar
236:LibStar
195:WP refs
183:scholar
121:protect
116:history
739:Google
678:Google
617:Google
496:WP:GNG
430:Delete
364:Delete
167:Google
125:delete
54:boldly
828:lwart
782:JSTOR
743:books
721:JSTOR
682:books
660:JSTOR
621:books
588:lwart
506:lwart
458:RaviC
440:lwart
398:RaviC
210:JSTOR
171:books
155:Stats
142:views
134:watch
130:links
68:lwart
16:<
775:FENS
749:news
714:FENS
688:news
653:FENS
627:news
605:and
575:and
480:talk
462:talk
450:Keep
417:talk
402:talk
380:talk
352:talk
332:talk
301:Talk
265:Talk
240:talk
203:FENS
177:news
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
849:ncr
806:ncr
789:TWL
728:TWL
667:TWL
554:ncr
530:ncr
217:TWL
146:– (
60:).
854:am
844:do
824:St
811:am
801:do
769:)
708:)
647:)
584:St
559:am
549:do
535:am
525:do
502:St
482:)
464:)
436:St
419:)
404:)
396:--
382:)
354:)
346:.
334:)
326:.
290:.
254:.
242:)
197:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
64:St
52:-
826:★
785:·
779:·
771:·
764:·
758:·
752:·
746:·
741:(
724:·
718:·
710:·
703:·
697:·
691:·
685:·
680:(
663:·
657:·
649:·
642:·
636:·
630:·
624:·
619:(
586:★
504:★
478:(
460:(
438:★
415:(
400:(
378:(
350:(
330:(
238:(
221:)
213:·
207:·
199:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
169:(
161:(
158:)
151:·
144:)
106:(
66:★
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.