Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Richard Hammar - Knowledge

Source 📝

458:-- General counsel to a major denomination may well be notable in itself. I expect that the 50 books are largely on legal topics. That they should be published by the denominational publishing house is also unsurprising. However, one someone comes across one of the 50, he (she) may want to know who this guy is. Having said that, this is a bad biography: it concentrates too much on background and far too little on what he has done in the course of a career of over 35 years. 325:, a newspaper profile of the subject, is a useful example of reliable, non-trivial source. Similar sorts of pieces from other newspapers or magazines would be helpful, or the equivalent on radio or television, in proportion to the reliability of the source--it need not be the NY Times or 60 Minutes, but a local church's newsletter or a local cable access show would not carry much weight. -- 474:
Thanks for the feedback, Peterkingiron! The 50 books are not published by the denominational publishing house - that is Gospel Publishing House. Richard Hammar's books are published by Christianity Today which has no ties to the Assemblies of God. I will add more about what he has done in his career
192:
Notability. There is a claim of notability... 5o books is a lot to "author", but I didn't find the the claim in the ref & anyway, I would expect decent refs if anybody had bought, read or reviewed any of them. Article needs a good haircut and all.
161: 243:
Thanks for your feedback, TheLongTone and Hobbes Goodyear! I have added some additional sources. This is my first page and I would welcome any further changes you might recommend to keep it on wikipedia.
435: 322: 212: 283:
None of the the new sources provides independent, substantial coverage of the subject. They do not provide a reason to suggest that this subject merits an encyclopedia article. --
114: 415: 155: 375: 300:
Hi Hobbes Goodyear, I've added some sources which I felt were independent. If these are not independent, please consider giving me an example and I will add it.
216: 317:
I had a look, but they seem mostly to be from his own publishers or book sellers, none of which could be considered independent. The remainder do not look
395: 121: 87: 82: 91: 268: 74: 17: 176: 143: 321:. (There is one local interest-type piece about a star photo that seems of fairly minor interest, w/r/t notability.) 219:, despite not being independent. But at this point, I don't see the sort of substantial sourcing from independent 520: 497: 347: 330: 288: 232: 40: 137: 463: 501: 484: 467: 447: 427: 407: 387: 367: 334: 309: 292: 272: 236: 202: 133: 56: 516: 355: 198: 36: 183: 493: 480: 476: 363: 359: 343: 326: 305: 301: 284: 264: 260: 256: 249: 245: 228: 169: 78: 459: 443: 423: 403: 383: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
515:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
351: 194: 149: 70: 62: 224: 439: 419: 399: 379: 318: 220: 53: 108: 211:, but I could be convinced otherwise with some additional sourcing. 492:
The counsel to a group with over 60 million adherents is notable.
509:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
436:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
358:) I would be curious if you find my updates acceptable? 104: 100: 96: 168: 416:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions 215:from the article is useful for notability, as is 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 523:). No further edits should be made to this page. 182: 8: 434:Note: This debate has been included in the 414:Note: This debate has been included in the 394:Note: This debate has been included in the 376:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 374:Note: This debate has been included in the 433: 413: 393: 373: 396:list of Law-related deletion discussions 7: 24: 252:) 17:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 475:as you suggested, thanks again 323:The ref I pointed to originally 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 502:16:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC) 485:17:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 468:15:56, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 448:17:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 428:17:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 408:17:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 388:17:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 368:02:51, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 335:02:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 310:01:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 293:17:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 273:16:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 237:00:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 203:23:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 57:10:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC) 540: 512:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 223:to make the case for 494:John Pack Lambert 450: 430: 410: 390: 276: 259:comment added by 531: 514: 275: 253: 221:reliable sources 187: 186: 172: 124: 112: 94: 34: 539: 538: 534: 533: 532: 530: 529: 528: 527: 521:deletion review 510: 344:Hobbes Goodyear 327:Hobbes Goodyear 285:Hobbes Goodyear 254: 229:Hobbes Goodyear 129: 120: 85: 69: 66: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 537: 535: 526: 525: 505: 504: 487: 471: 470: 452: 451: 431: 411: 391: 340: 339: 338: 337: 298: 297: 296: 295: 278: 277: 240: 239: 190: 189: 126: 71:Richard Hammar 65: 63:Richard Hammar 60: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 536: 524: 522: 518: 513: 507: 506: 503: 499: 495: 491: 488: 486: 482: 478: 473: 472: 469: 465: 461: 460:Peterkingiron 457: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 432: 429: 425: 421: 417: 412: 409: 405: 401: 397: 392: 389: 385: 381: 377: 372: 371: 370: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 307: 303: 294: 290: 286: 282: 281: 280: 279: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 251: 247: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 185: 181: 178: 175: 171: 167: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 139: 135: 132: 131:Find sources: 127: 123: 119: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 511: 508: 489: 455: 341: 299: 255:— Preceding 208: 191: 179: 173: 165: 158: 152: 146: 140: 130: 117: 49: 47: 31: 28: 352:TheLongTone 195:TheLongTone 156:free images 477:Hml1315092 360:Hml1315092 302:Hml1315092 261:Hml1315092 246:Hml1315092 225:notability 517:talk page 440:• Gene93k 420:• Gene93k 400:• Gene93k 380:• Gene93k 37:talk page 519:or in a 319:reliable 269:contribs 257:unsigned 213:This ref 115:View log 39:or in a 244:Cheers, 162:WP refs 150:scholar 88:protect 83:history 54:Spartaz 209:Delete 134:Google 92:delete 177:JSTOR 138:books 122:Stats 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 498:talk 490:Keep 481:talk 464:talk 456:Keep 444:talk 424:talk 404:talk 384:talk 364:talk 356:talk 348:talk 331:talk 306:talk 289:talk 265:talk 250:talk 233:talk 227:. -- 217:this 199:talk 170:FENS 144:news 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 50:keep 184:TWL 113:– ( 52:. 500:) 483:) 466:) 446:) 438:. 426:) 418:. 406:) 398:. 386:) 378:. 366:) 350:) 342:-- 333:) 308:) 291:) 271:) 267:• 235:) 201:) 164:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 496:( 479:( 462:( 442:( 422:( 402:( 382:( 362:( 354:( 346:( 329:( 304:( 287:( 263:( 248:( 231:( 197:( 188:) 180:· 174:· 166:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 141:· 136:( 128:( 125:) 118:· 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Spartaz
10:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Richard Hammar
Richard Hammar
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
TheLongTone
talk
23:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.