Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Richard Keatley - Knowledge

Source 📝

166: 249: 229: 315: 119: 295: 160: 517:
demonstrating that his candidacy would somehow deserve special treatment over and above all the non-winning candidates in last year's election who
126: 92: 87: 96: 79: 17: 181: 148: 513:
his work as an academic, of which none has been shown here at all — and the amount of campaign coverage shown here is
323: 303: 477:
if coverage of the election campaign itself were all it took. To get an as yet unelected candidate into Knowledge
585: 223:
criteria based on coverage in Atlanta Journal Constitution, primary newspaper for city of Atlanta, see ref. 3.~~
142: 40: 566: 449: 445: 424: 405: 388: 360: 327: 307: 285: 261: 241: 214: 138: 61: 319: 299: 83: 581: 401: 356: 36: 537:
fails to garner at least as much coverage as has been shown here — our guiding notability principle is
188: 494: 281: 202: 75: 67: 174: 502: 441: 415:
Simply listing a bibliography of his work isn't what it takes to demonstrate a WP:ACADEMIC pass.
384: 376: 346: 335: 257: 237: 210: 562: 542: 522: 420: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
580:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
493:
throwing his hat in the electoral ring, or (b) the coverage of his candidacy is exploding to
154: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
397: 370: 352: 57: 277: 538: 273: 474: 437: 380: 253: 233: 220: 206: 198: 558: 416: 205:
as a candidate for office who isn't in office. PROD removed by article creator. –
113: 501:
of his academic publications in the article is not what it takes to get him over
53: 485:
of the election, what you need to show is one of two things: either (a) he was
521:
get articles for that fact in and of itself. Campaign coverage is
574:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
201:
for significant coverage in reliable sources. He doesn't meet
250:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
338:
added bibliography of independent research in renaissance~~
230:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
539:"what will people still need to know ten years from now?" 316:
list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions
109: 105: 101: 525:, not notability-conferring in and of itself, because 173: 489:
notable enough for an article for some other reason
375:There is no evidence that he meets the criteria of 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 588:). No further edits should be made to this page. 296:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions 187: 8: 545:, so politicians get Knowledge articles for 314:Note: This debate has been included in the 294:Note: This debate has been included in the 248:Note: This debate has been included in the 228:Note: This debate has been included in the 396:== see added bibliography of original work 313: 293: 247: 227: 543:"who happens to be in the news today?" 440:, non-notable candidate for office. 7: 497:proportions. But simply including a 457:. Local coverage of local elections 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 276:by this unelected politician. 197:This individual does not meet 1: 328:15:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 308:15:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 286:06:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 262:06:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 242:06:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 215:06:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC) 605: 567:22:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 450:04:04, 3 March 2017 (UTC) 425:22:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 406:17:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 389:05:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC) 361:05:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC) 62:06:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC) 577:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 219:==individual does meet 553:office, not just for 495:Christine O'Donnell 481:he's declared the 557:in an election. 330: 320:Shawn in Montreal 310: 300:Shawn in Montreal 264: 244: 596: 579: 374: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 34: 604: 603: 599: 598: 597: 595: 594: 593: 592: 586:deletion review 575: 368: 134: 125: 90: 76:Richard Keatley 74: 71: 68:Richard Keatley 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 602: 600: 591: 590: 570: 569: 473:claim to pass 465:candidate for 452: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 394: 393: 392: 391: 350: 349: 332: 331: 311: 290: 289: 266: 265: 245: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 601: 589: 587: 583: 578: 572: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 549:election and 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 529:candidate in 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 469:office could 468: 464: 460: 456: 453: 451: 447: 443: 442:ErieSwiftByrd 439: 438:Knowledge:CAE 435: 432: 426: 422: 418: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 403: 399: 390: 386: 382: 378: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 348: 344: 341: 340: 339: 337: 329: 325: 321: 317: 312: 309: 305: 301: 297: 292: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 272:. No pass of 271: 268: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 246: 243: 239: 235: 231: 226: 225: 224: 222: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 203:WP:POLITICIAN 200: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 576: 573: 554: 550: 546: 534: 530: 526: 518: 514: 510: 506: 499:bibliography 498: 490: 486: 482: 478: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 433: 395: 351: 342: 333: 269: 218: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 49: 47: 31: 28: 505:— it takes 503:WP:ACADEMIC 461:exists, so 398:Dougbremner 377:WP:ACADEMIC 371:Dougbremner 353:Dougbremner 347:WP:ACADEMIC 345:. based on 336:WP:ACADEMIC 161:free images 523:WP:ROUTINE 278:Xxanthippe 582:talk page 533:election 509:coverage 37:talk page 584:or in a 381:Muboshgu 254:Muboshgu 234:Muboshgu 207:Muboshgu 120:View log 39:or in a 559:Bearcat 555:running 551:holding 547:winning 487:already 417:Bearcat 274:WP:Prof 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 541:, not 519:didn't 491:before 483:winner 479:before 475:WP:GNG 471:always 459:always 455:Delete 436:. Per 434:Delete 343:Retain 270:Delete 221:WP:GNG 199:WP:GNG 139:Google 97:delete 54:Kurykh 50:delete 511:about 507:media 463:every 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 563:talk 535:ever 446:talk 421:talk 402:talk 385:talk 379:. – 357:talk 324:talk 304:talk 282:talk 258:talk 252:. – 238:talk 232:. – 211:talk 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 531:any 515:not 467:any 189:TWL 118:– ( 52:. 565:) 527:no 448:) 423:) 404:) 387:) 359:) 334:== 326:) 318:. 306:) 298:. 284:) 260:) 240:) 213:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 561:( 444:( 419:( 400:( 383:( 373:: 369:@ 355:( 322:( 302:( 288:. 280:( 256:( 236:( 209:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Kurykh
talk
06:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Richard Keatley
Richard Keatley
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG
WP:POLITICIAN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.