Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Richard Pochinko - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

162:
A website on Geocities is not absolute evidence of non-notability. Of course, it doesn't show N. But by looking at what was there, and at the 560 ghits, about half are real: there's an academic lecture on the subject from the Institute of Canadian studies at the Univ. of Wollongon, a study guide
163:
from the Canadian Arts Center, etc. I've added a few quotes in the references--they will need to be integrated into the article. Circus studies is a real field academically, and circus performers can be N as artists.
110: 83: 78: 87: 17: 70: 184: 36: 183:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
169: 152: 140: 121: 52: 74: 49: 131:
Geocities is as reliable as MySpace or YouTube. In other words, not at all. As such, it fails
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
117:
Only cite given to show notability is a geocities page. Does this pass the WP:BIO criteria?
66: 58: 132: 149: 137: 118: 104: 148:
with new references. But I still feel Geocities is not a reliable source.
165: 177:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 187:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 204: 180:Please do not modify it. 170:03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 153:12:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 141:14:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 122:12:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 53:15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 195: 182: 108: 90: 67:Richard Pochinko 59:Richard Pochinko 34: 203: 202: 198: 197: 196: 194: 193: 192: 191: 185:deletion review 178: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 201: 199: 190: 189: 173: 172: 157: 156: 155: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 200: 188: 186: 181: 175: 174: 171: 168: 167: 161: 158: 154: 151: 147: 144: 143: 142: 139: 136: 134: 130: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 179: 176: 164: 159: 145: 128: 127: 116: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 150:DarkAudit 138:DarkAudit 119:The Anome 111:View log 84:protect 79:history 50:W.marsh 133:WP:BIO 129:Delete 88:delete 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 160:Keep 146:Keep 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 166:DGG 109:– ( 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 135:. 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Richard Pochinko
Richard Pochinko
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
The Anome
12:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
WP:BIO
DarkAudit
14:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
DarkAudit
12:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
DGG
03:35, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.