210:. There's clearly a conflict of interest here and a fair amount of 'hype' + very vague references. All that can be remedied (in theory) and shouldn't necessarily be a factor in deciding notability. However, from my research, his notability (if any) is extremely marginal. His wife, Ava Spence, is probably more notable than he is, at least in Google News.
275:. I haven't found any evidence that suggests McAllister has been "critically acclaimed", although he seems well enough known on the contemporary music circuit. As for the Pulitzer Prize nomination... um... anyone can nominate someone, even themselves. What counts is the jury's final selection. Having searched the Pulitzer Prize data base,
351:
I agree with you about research. I don't really feel that I can nominate an article for deletion (or even vote delete) until I've done everything possible to see if notability could be established. I've managed to save at least three from oblivion, when at first sight the situation looked pretty
256:
web site. (I checked out the ones that are online and the ones at the SAP site are accurate quotes.) The rest are either 'forthcoming' and/or on very small labels. He appears to have been a 'band member' rather than a soloist in
322:, if you're notable, let someone completely unaffiliated with you write an article about you! And if the anon editor from D.C. is reading this, it has nothing to do with academic snobbery and everything to do with the fact that
270:"In 2005, critically acclaimed and Pulitzer-nominated American composer Scott McAllister, wrote a piece for Spece entitled BlingBling. Spece premiered the piece at the Strathmore Music in the Mansion Series in January 2006..."
184:
123:
233:
130:
Classical clarinetist of dubious notability. Involved in some recordings, but most if not all references are trivial. Article was created by subject's wife. --
371:
per my comments above. No evidence of notability from reliable sources has been forthcoming. I suggest the article's creator copy the article to a sandbox, e.g.
310:
guidelines. I was hesitant to nominate this for deletion as I didn't feel like doing the sort of research that
Voceditenore did and felt like that was the
226:
211:
352:
dire. But in this case, I'm afraid not. There really isn't enough evidence that Mr. Spece is a notable enough for an encyclopedia article.
17:
90:
85:
94:
218:
77:
402:
36:
225:
in Google
Scholar or Books. A few mentions of him in Google News (all dates) - basically very brief concert notices.
273:
214:
319:
314:
thing to do, although the burden of providing additional refs should really be on the article's creator. Although
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
332:
for example), then certainly this article could be recreated. This is the avenue you might consider exploring.
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
170:
372:
250:
384:
380:
361:
357:
341:
292:
288:
199:
174:
157:
140:
59:
195:
81:
328:
73:
65:
49:
241:
138:
283:
I'll wait to see how the discussion develops, but I'm highly inclined to vote delete as of now.
376:
353:
284:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
307:
303:
150:
337:
191:
323:
315:
311:
326:. If Spece's work gets substantively written about in multiple non-trivial sources (think
318:
isn't necessarily a criterion for deletion, that should also be taken into account. Per
154:
131:
253:
111:
252:. It was reviewed a fair amount in the specialist press. See this section of the
333:
166:
278:, there's no mention whatsoever of McAllister as a "nominated finalist".
302:
per
Voceditenore's research (thanks for your work) and failure to meet
395:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
165:. Impossible to verify based on vagueness of citations given.
324:
Knowledge (XXG) is not here to help promote anyone's career
276:
240:
Re his PhD. from ISU, true, here's his doctoral recital.
235:
Below is all the relevant stuff I could find on the web.
185:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
118:
107:
103:
99:
217:. Not surprisingly, that article was also created by
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
405:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
272:Spece did indeed premiere the piece, see
375:, if she wants to save the Wiki mark-up.
245:His most prominent recording is probably
183:: This debate has been included in the
265:- Northwest Sinfonietta (Sonic 1999).
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
228:, apart from these relating to
268:Re this claim in the article:
1:
320:the autobiography guidelines
221:. Nothing for either him or
213:. She's the Director of the
422:
215:DC Youth Orchestra Program
398:Please do not modify it.
385:14:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
362:14:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
342:16:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
293:10:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
249:. For more details, see
230:"Saeculum Aureum Players
200:20:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
175:18:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
158:21:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
141:21:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
60:23:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
254:Saeculum Aureum Players
223:Saeculum Aureum Players
263:Mozart Piano Concertos
373:User:Ecepsava/Sandbox
316:conflict of interest
329:The Washington Post
308:musician notability
259:Saxophone Vocalise
44:The result was
261:(Delos 1994) and
247:Vintage Woodwinds
202:
188:
413:
400:
189:
179:
136:
121:
115:
97:
57:
52:
34:
421:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
411:
410:
409:
403:deletion review
396:
132:
117:
88:
72:
69:
55:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
419:
417:
408:
407:
390:
388:
387:
365:
364:
345:
344:
296:
295:
280:
279:
266:
243:
237:
236:
204:
203:
177:
160:
128:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
418:
406:
404:
399:
393:
392:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
350:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
277:
274:
271:
267:
264:
260:
255:
251:
248:
244:
242:
239:
238:
234:
231:
227:
224:
220:
219:User:Ecepsava
216:
212:
209:
206:
205:
201:
197:
193:
186:
182:
178:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
159:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
137:
135:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:Richard Spece
71:
70:
67:
66:Richard Spece
64:
62:
61:
58:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
397:
394:
389:
377:Voceditenore
368:
354:Voceditenore
348:
327:
299:
285:Voceditenore
269:
262:
258:
246:
229:
222:
207:
180:
162:
146:
133:
129:
45:
43:
31:
28:
192:Fabrictramp
312:good faith
304:notability
155:Ramsquire
51:Seraphim♥
134:Finngall
124:View log
349:Comment
208:Comment
151:WP:NOTE
91:protect
86:history
369:Delete
334:Katr67
300:Delete
167:Stifle
163:Delete
147:Delete
119:delete
95:delete
46:Delete
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
56:Whipp
16:<
381:talk
358:talk
338:talk
306:and
289:talk
196:talk
181:Note
171:talk
149:per
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
190:--
187:.
383:)
360:)
340:)
291:)
232:.
198:)
173:)
153:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
48:.
379:(
356:(
336:(
287:(
194:(
169:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.