401:
Unless I misunderstood something about the WP:SIGCOV link, but if you search "Rio sequel" on Google, you find sites citing what Sergio Mendes said about Rio 2 being likely quite often, or does it refer multiple sources with different citing different information? Back to the subject of redirect or
373:
for the article to be written at this time. When there is firm evidence and significant coverage to say that Rio 2 will be created, then the article may be written, but as of now, really you can still post information regarding this sequel at
446:
for really anything to be put on the article that's good and solid, as you saw yourself when an IP put Anne
Hathaway onto the article. Until significant coverage is available to say that Rio 2 is going to be made, then cover it at
161:
341:, and thought it would be more fitting to have the article named something like this. But since it's under articles for deletion right now, I'm not going to rename the article itself at the moment.--
273:
122:
311:, when I mentioned this, the creator changed the citations in the article to "Untitled Rio sequel". All another reason this shouldn't merit an article of its own.
155:
251:
202:. There really isn't enough evidence to establish notability for an independent article, and really I have no problem with the article just redirecting to
302:
sounds good to me, as well. I agree that there does not appear to be enough in-depth coverage to support a separate article at this time (
537:. If/when this film meets the criteria for inclusion, this article title should be redirected to the actual title of the film instead. -
463:
387:
324:
238:
215:
414:
Sergio Mendes gave one claim, one sentence, that triggered a slight burst in news. This "significant coverage" does not qualify the
17:
338:
176:
430:
process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn and/or rendered, and final recordings of
143:
590:
362:
334:
95:
90:
40:
99:
459:
383:
320:
234:
211:
82:
586:
36:
137:
534:
406:
403:
345:
342:
226:
567:
169:
133:
426:
In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the
571:
546:
521:
498:
467:
409:
391:
348:
328:
287:
265:
242:
219:
64:
542:
511:
494:
455:
451:
443:
379:
370:
316:
312:
283:
261:
230:
207:
199:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
585:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
183:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
479:
354:
194:
60:
365:
has 46 inline citations alone). Since there isn't much sources to say that the sequel to
563:
427:
559:
415:
538:
490:
279:
257:
149:
116:
358:
56:
555:
530:
448:
431:
375:
299:
203:
86:
51:
482:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
307:
We actually don't know whether the name of the article is going to be called
402:
article, now that I think about it, a redirect may be best for now.--
78:
70:
579:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
353:
The reason those articles are included are because they have
274:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
333:
Reason I did that was I've seen articles titles such as
112:
108:
104:
168:
489:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
593:). No further edits should be made to this page.
514:, no verifiable info on a sequel at this point.
182:
8:
272:Note: This debate has been included in the
250:Note: This debate has been included in the
271:
249:
252:list of Film-related deletion discussions
339:Untitled Thomas and Friends Film Project
416:notability guideline for future films
7:
369:will be created, it's just simply
24:
562:, which this clearly fails. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
357:to comply with Knowledge's
610:
572:14:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
547:21:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
522:05:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
499:22:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
468:19:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
410:23:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
392:17:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
349:10:56, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
329:22:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
65:22:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
434:and music have commenced.
363:Untitled Star Trek sequel
335:Untitled Star Trek sequel
288:14:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
266:14:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
243:14:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
220:14:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
192:It's basically a case of
582:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
437:
423:
359:notability guideline
355:significant coverage
48:The result was
556:Rio (film)#Sequel
531:Rio (film)#Sequel
501:
449:Rio (film)#Sequel
418:, which tells us:
376:Rio (film)#Sequel
300:Rio (film)#Sequel
290:
277:
268:
255:
204:Rio (film)#Sequel
52:Rio (film)#Sequel
601:
584:
519:
517:Ten Pound Hammer
488:
484:
304:
303:
278:
256:
225:I'm sorry, it's
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
34:
609:
608:
604:
603:
602:
600:
599:
598:
597:
591:deletion review
580:
515:
477:
129:
93:
77:
74:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
607:
605:
596:
595:
575:
574:
549:
524:
504:
503:
502:
486:
485:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
428:pre-production
422:
421:
420:
419:
396:
395:
394:
331:
305:
292:
291:
269:
246:
245:
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
606:
594:
592:
588:
583:
577:
576:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
550:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:WP:NotJustYet
532:
528:
525:
523:
518:
513:
509:
506:
505:
500:
496:
492:
487:
483:
481:
476:
475:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
445:
441:
440:
439:
438:
436:
435:
433:
429:
417:
413:
412:
411:
408:
405:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
297:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
275:
270:
267:
263:
259:
253:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:WP:NotJustYet
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
581:
578:
551:
526:
516:
507:
478:
456:Michaelzeng7
442:It's simply
425:
424:
398:
380:Michaelzeng7
366:
317:Michaelzeng7
308:
295:
231:Michaelzeng7
208:Michaelzeng7
193:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
432:voice-overs
156:free images
564:Rob Sinden
512:WP:TOOSOON
404:BarrettM82
371:WP:TOOSOON
343:BarrettM82
200:WP:CRYSTAL
587:talk page
280:• Gene93k
258:• Gene93k
195:WP:NOTYET
37:talk page
589:or in a
552:Redirect
527:Redirect
480:Relisted
464:contribs
444:too soon
388:contribs
325:contribs
296:Redirect
239:contribs
216:contribs
123:View log
39:or in a
558:as per
539:Jorgath
491:BusterD
452:for now
407:Contact
399:Comment
346:Contact
162:WP refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
560:WP:NFF
508:Delete
134:Google
100:delete
57:JohnCD
361:(the
309:Rio 2
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
79:Rio 2
71:Rio 2
16:<
568:talk
543:talk
533:per
510:per
495:talk
460:talk
454:. --
384:talk
378:. --
337:and
321:talk
315:. --
284:talk
262:talk
235:talk
229:. --
212:talk
198:and
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
61:talk
554:to
545:)
529:to
520:•
367:Rio
313:Yet
298:to
206:. -
184:TWL
121:– (
570:)
497:)
466:)
462:-
390:)
386:-
327:)
323:-
286:)
276:.
264:)
254:.
241:)
237:-
218:)
214:-
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
63:)
55:.
566:(
541:(
493:(
458:(
382:(
319:(
282:(
260:(
233:(
210:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.