353:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
259:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later. Also, significantly, this is an inadequately-sourced BLP in a controversial area.
358:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
357:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
250:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Other projects can cover this material, Knowledge (XXG) consensus has determined that Knowledge (XXG) is not that project. Should sourcing and claim of notability sufficient for Knowledge (XXG) later be found, the
204:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
233:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
162:
323:
349:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
193:
123:
300:
156:
280:
277:
17:
230:
59:
238:
96:
91:
100:
354:
177:
144:
83:
484:
36:
234:
362:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
483:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
138:
465:
134:
469:
452:
426:
403:
376:
365:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
338:
315:
292:
268:
242:
220:
65:
87:
264:
184:
170:
386:
350:
445:
372:
334:
311:
288:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
461:
359:
210:
399:
214:
150:
260:
49:
360:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
440:
419:
414:
as this editor is banned from BLP editing, yet nominated over 100 BLPs for deletion.
368:
330:
307:
284:
117:
79:
71:
395:
389:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
460:- lacks the significant reliable coverage to meet notability standards.
477:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
436:
Nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
324:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
437:
415:
113:
109:
105:
169:
394:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
209:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
183:
194:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
487:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
322:Note: This debate has been included in the
299:Note: This debate has been included in the
301:list of People-related deletion discussions
321:
298:
276:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
231:List of Playboy Playmates of 1983
1:
211:general notability guideline
251:article can be re-started.
504:
339:20:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
316:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
293:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
269:19:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
243:17:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
221:02:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
480:Please do not modify it.
470:01:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
453:02:47, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
427:02:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
205:solely related to their
66:15:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
404:02:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
377:14:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
278:WikiProject Pornography
235:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
198:Playmate of the Month
202:Playmate of the Year
355:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
61:Operation Big Bear
44:The result was
450:
425:
406:
367:
341:
327:
318:
304:
281:list of deletions
218:
495:
482:
446:
443:
424:
393:
391:
363:
328:
305:
295:
216:
188:
187:
173:
121:
103:
62:
56:
34:
503:
502:
498:
497:
496:
494:
493:
492:
491:
485:deletion review
478:
449:
441:
434:Procedural Keep
402:
384:
347:Procedural Keep
275:
196:. Being chosen
130:
94:
78:
75:
64:
60:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
501:
499:
490:
489:
473:
472:
455:
447:
430:
429:
408:
407:
398:
392:
381:
380:
379:
343:
342:
319:
296:
272:
271:
245:
191:
190:
127:
74:
69:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
500:
488:
486:
481:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
454:
451:
444:
438:
435:
432:
431:
428:
422:
421:
416:
413:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
390:
388:
383:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
325:
320:
317:
313:
309:
302:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
274:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
256:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
212:
208:
203:
199:
195:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
57:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
479:
476:
457:
433:
418:
411:
385:
364:
346:
254:
252:
247:
226:
207:playmatehood
206:
201:
197:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
462:TerriersFan
157:free images
80:Ruth Guerri
72:Ruth Guerri
351:WP:BEFORE
331:• Gene93k
308:• Gene93k
285:• Gene93k
261:Dekkappai
53:Wizardman
420:Milowent
387:Relisted
257:redirect
227:Redirect
124:View log
369:Carrite
215:Damiens
163:WP refs
151:scholar
97:protect
92:history
458:Delete
248:Delete
135:Google
101:delete
46:delete
442:Monty
396:Logan
178:JSTOR
139:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
466:talk
412:Keep
400:Talk
373:talk
335:talk
312:talk
289:talk
265:talk
239:talk
171:FENS
145:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
448:845
417:.--
329:--
255:NOT
253:Do
229:to
217:.rf
200:or
185:TWL
122:– (
468:)
439:.
423:•
375:)
337:)
326:.
314:)
303:.
291:)
283:.
267:)
241:)
213:.
165:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
48:.
464:(
371:(
333:(
310:(
306:—
287:(
263:(
237:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.