361:"number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally expected." unless something is inherently notable, notability is demonstrated by the depth of coverage which includes indepth articles but also contained in multiple sources. a bilateral relations article hinging on 3 sources is lower on the notability rung.
385:
Trinidad's relationship with Russia, including the tourists who visit, their visa statuses, why
Russians have recently been allowed to visit with visas and concerns about the spread of the Russian mafia to Trinidad. Moreover, the Russian state oil company, GazProm, owns what looks to be a significant amount of Trinidad's natural gas production; this is another sign of relatively important relations.--
384:
Where does it say that bilateral relations articles are held to a higher standard than all other articles? No articles would be deleted because they "only" have 3 or 4 sources. It says "multiple", not "a dozen". The nature of the sources is not trivial; they are commentaries discussing the facts of
442:
Not ready to say delete yet, since there's a suggestion that improvements might be made, but I'm not impressed with the significance. The thing about Russia being fourth is based on percentages-- "US 30.87%, Colombia 7.1%, Venezuela 7.01%, Russia 6.64%", so Russia would be a distant fourth. The
443:
article in some places is a word-for-word duplicate of the source cited; in the rest of the places, it's a matter of paraphrasing a few words in a sentence. Still, a question I'd pose is whether one can cite an example of U.S. relations with any nation in the world that would
447:
be notable. Moreover, this shallow, recentist description misses the point that Moscow was trying to strengthen its foothold in the
Caribbean during the Cold War. I get a laugh out the idea that Russia isn't the successor to the Soviet Union.
156:
294:(a colonial relationship which lasted hundreds of years), these articles also demonstrate notability. CIA Factbook lists Russia as the fourth largest importer to Trinidad, which I'd say is an indicator of the relationship
563:
the article describes them as "potential heavy oil players" and provides no evidence of actual bilateral cooperation or these countries talking to each other. nor does it qualify as indepth coverage of a relationship.
289:
Sources demonstrate a bilateral relationship which began 37 years ago with fairly regular contact, especially for a small state like
Trinidad. While I still wish editors would create more articles like
150:
90:
85:
94:
265:
77:
459:
I'd also note that the relationship seems to be of growing importance, as demonstrated by the 3 articles from
Trinidadian newspapers regarding the issue of Russian visitors from January 2011.--
322:
I would disagree. The sources I have added demonstrate notability. It is not the strongest bilateral relationship, but one clearly exists per multiple, reliable, independent sources.--
117:
291:
239:
213:
81:
191:
171:
138:
73:
65:
573:
556:
528:
514:
498:
463:
452:
420:
407:
389:
370:
349:
340:
326:
317:
301:
280:
254:
228:
202:
59:
190:, and it really isn't a lot of relations, no significant cultural, diplomatic or economic relations. the only coverage I could find is multilateral
394:
Where is this
Gazprom info from? I can find speculation from ~2007 that BP might sell to Gazprom, but nothing since, and no mention of Gazprom on
132:
128:
178:
470:
Honestly, if there's anything significant in terms of the relationship between TT and Russia it probably revolves around people like
17:
144:
586:
36:
540:- I think there's potential, here and in "real life", for example, both nations are involved in the development of
413:
585:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
193:. Those wanting to keep should provide actual evidence of indepth coverage of relations not vague arguments.
295:
524:
494:
403:
164:
416:
2006 article from oilandgasinsight.com says they had begun purchasing natural gas from
Trinidad.--
569:
552:
510:
366:
336:
313:
276:
250:
224:
198:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
520:
490:
486:
482:
471:
449:
399:
188:
55:
489:
in
Grenada. And I have my doubts about that. The current content though, is trivial.
565:
548:
506:
362:
332:
309:
272:
246:
220:
194:
111:
460:
417:
386:
346:
323:
298:
545:
478:
50:
541:
308:
as per WP:GNG, there is a lack of coverage of this relationship.
579:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
481:, and later, in the context of the Soviet-supported regime of
395:
266:
list of
Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions
412:
I may have misstated the
Gazprom information slightly.
107:
103:
99:
163:
519:
Neither. It is, after all, a discussion, not a vote.
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
589:). No further edits should be made to this page.
292:Trinidad and Tobago – United Kingdom relations
240:list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions
8:
214:list of Russia-related deletion discussions
331:3 sources is hardly significant coverage.
260:
234:
208:
345:Really? Where is GNG does it say that?--
264:: This debate has been included in the
238:: This debate has been included in the
212:: This debate has been included in the
74:Russia – Trinidad and Tobago relations
66:Russia – Trinidad and Tobago relations
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
505:so are you saying keep or delete?
24:
1:
187:article is a blatant copy of
574:23:10, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
557:22:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
529:05:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
515:04:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
499:04:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
464:02:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
453:02:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
421:03:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
408:02:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
390:14:23, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
371:06:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
350:05:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
341:04:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
327:03:41, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
318:02:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
302:02:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
281:16:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
255:16:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
229:16:39, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
203:01:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
60:00:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
606:
582:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
396:Atlantic LNG's website
544:or heavy oil, see
44:The result was
283:
269:
257:
243:
231:
217:
597:
584:
270:
244:
218:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
605:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
595:
594:
593:
587:deletion review
580:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
603:
601:
592:
591:
576:
560:
559:
534:
533:
532:
531:
502:
501:
487:Maurice Bishop
485:in Guyana and
483:Forbes Burnham
472:George Padmore
467:
466:
456:
455:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
305:
304:
284:
258:
232:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
602:
590:
588:
583:
577:
575:
571:
567:
562:
561:
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
539:
536:
535:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
477:
473:
469:
468:
465:
462:
458:
457:
454:
451:
446:
441:
438:
437:
422:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
388:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
368:
364:
351:
348:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
328:
325:
321:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
306:
303:
300:
296:
293:
288:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
256:
252:
248:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
222:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
581:
578:
537:
475:
444:
439:
360:
286:
261:
235:
209:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
151:free images
538:Weak keep
521:Guettarda
491:Guettarda
479:CLR James
450:Mandsford
440:Weak keep
400:Guettarda
273:• Gene93k
247:• Gene93k
221:• Gene93k
118:View log
566:LibStar
549:Bearian
542:kerogen
507:LibStar
363:LibStar
333:LibStar
310:LibStar
195:LibStar
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
129:Google
95:delete
476:maybe
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
570:talk
553:talk
525:talk
511:talk
495:talk
414:This
404:talk
367:talk
337:talk
314:talk
287:Keep
277:talk
262:Note
251:talk
236:Note
225:talk
210:Note
199:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
445:not
271:--
245:--
219:--
179:TWL
116:– (
572:)
555:)
547:.
527:)
513:)
497:)
474:,
461:TM
418:TM
406:)
398:.
387:TM
369:)
347:TM
339:)
324:TM
316:)
299:TM
297:--
279:)
268:.
253:)
242:.
227:)
216:.
201:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
568:(
551:(
523:(
509:(
493:(
402:(
365:(
335:(
312:(
275:(
249:(
223:(
197:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.