154:
I withdraw my suggestion that this was a bad faith nom and hope you'll both accept my apology and see where I might have gotten confused. I still disagree with your Afd reasoning, (as well as, frankly, many of your statements above) but you're right, this is about Rusty
Trombone. So let's see what
209:
Knowledge (XXG) isn't censored takes care of the first three (it is a parent's job to decide what web content is viewed by his/her children, not ours). Slightly more than a dictdef, and no sources merits a cleanup tag, not deletion. (Unverifiable, on the other hand, would be a valid reason, but it
129:
Oh, yes, it's good faith, all right. I have no qualms about putting offensive material in user space, but
Knowledge (XXG) namespace is not owned or maintained by any one person, hence my concerns about the stupidity of the article. BTW, I've removed the objectionable content on my user page. I
81:
Harmful to the psyche of a child is too subjective to be a criteria. As for whether or not it's a dicdef, it does make some attempts to list popular cultural references to the "act" (which could be sourced, if they're not) which makes it more than a dicdef. We've been down this road before with
130:
personally think that the idea of transsexualism is offensive and total fiction, but that's just what squicks me, and the PC Police here don't care about my minority opinion (cf.
115:. I personally am not particularly offended by the language there (though not really a fan of harshly mocking either transexuals or women) but then again, I'm not offended by
263:, as the nominator has given no valid Wikipolicy-based reasons for his nomination. "Offensive" and "stupid" are not criteria for deletion here, otherwise we'd delete
52:
49:
17:
279:
Keeping it would set a dangerous precedent, and allow users to assert every other ludicrous bit of sexcruft article for inclusion.
90:
side of the issue and ought to stay. Also, I realized while reading it that I always thought this phrase referred to a
300:
36:
251:
Deleting it would set a dangerous precedent, and allow users to slate every other sex-related article for deletion. --
299:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
239:
285:
271:
255:
243:
226:
214:
201:
189:
177:
159:
138:
124:
98:
68:
235:
83:
64:
Offensive, obscene, probably permanently harmful to the psyche of a child, stupid dictdef, no sources.
185:
Yuck, but notable. If anyone wants to clean up (no pun intended) this article, I think it'd be fine.
252:
268:
131:
135:
108:
65:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
197:
I have every confidence in the nominator's good faith, but his arguments do not convince.--
174:
116:
58:
281:
264:
211:
87:
198:
223:
186:
156:
121:
95:
113:
Offensive, obscene, probably permanently harmful to the psyche of a child
94:
sexual act. Ah, Knowledge (XXG)....always teaching me something.
107:
Are you sure you made this nom in good faith? Your own user page
293:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
78:
134:). Anyway, this is about the rusty trombone, not me.
77:The first two criteria of the nom are not valid as
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
303:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
111:has some material that some might feel is
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
86:but I think this one is more on the
155:everyone else has to say. Cheers.
234:, highly referenced in culture. --
24:
79:Knowledge (XXG) is not censored.
286:10:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
272:00:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
256:18:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
244:01:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
227:15:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
215:12:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
202:21:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
190:19:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
178:19:34, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
160:19:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
139:18:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
125:17:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
99:17:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
69:16:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
53:00:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
50:Can't sleep, clown will eat me
1:
320:
296:Please do not modify it.
222:Culturally appropriate.
210:isn't applicable here.)
32:Please do not modify it.
173:Dictionary definition.
84:Pitssburgh platter
242:
311:
298:
238:
34:
319:
318:
314:
313:
312:
310:
309:
308:
307:
301:deletion review
294:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
317:
315:
306:
305:
289:
288:
274:
258:
253:Spartacusprime
246:
236:badlydrawnjeff
229:
217:
204:
192:
180:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
144:
143:
142:
141:
117:Rusty trombone
101:
61:
59:Rusty trombone
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
316:
304:
302:
297:
291:
290:
287:
284:
283:
278:
275:
273:
270:
269:wikipediatrix
266:
265:Jerry Falwell
262:
259:
257:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
218:
216:
213:
208:
205:
203:
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:
161:
158:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
140:
137:
133:
128:
127:
126:
123:
120:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
100:
97:
93:
89:
88:Dirty Sanchez
85:
80:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
295:
292:
280:
276:
260:
248:
231:
219:
206:
194:
182:
170:
151:
136:Billy Blythe
112:
109:Billy Blythe
104:
103:
91:
74:
66:Billy Blythe
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
261:Speedy Keep
175:JASpencer
92:different
212:GassyGuy
132:WP:STEAM
199:Runcorn
152:Comment
119:either.
105:Comment
277:Delete
224:Lolife
171:Delete
187:Wooty
16:<
249:Keep
240:talk
232:Keep
220:Keep
207:Keep
195:Keep
183:Keep
157:Dina
122:Dina
96:Dina
75:Keep
46:keep
282:Guy
48:.
267:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.