357:, for example, is very important in the Linux world but pretty much unknown everywhere else. Just because Windows users have never heard of it does not mean a sizable amount of Linux users do not eagerly read its posts. Secondly, this article is needed as part of Knowledge (XXG)'s infrastructure. If you put the likes of "Matt Booty" into an article search you get two relevant articles that mention him. Do a search for Ryan "icculus" Gordon however and it is quite a different story. There are many articles that mention him and link to this article. And thirdly, he is not just a member of the gaming industry but the Linux and Mac industry as well. In fact, on Linux he could easily be called a leader in his field. Because of this niche market fulfillment it elevates his importance over just one name in the crowd Windows game programmers. Also Matt Booty might not be notable but Midway is and in many ways Gordon acts more like a company than a person in terms of output. Hence the amount of articles that would link to Midway and not Booty would always in the equivalent case link to this article. Please keep this in mind.
410:. As I am sure that is not your intention, perhaps you can post your reasons for doubting the sources so we can have a reasonable discussion about it. Also, I never insinuated that other articles can be used as sources. My point was if we remove Ryan C. Gordon it would immediately become noticeable on the Wanted Pages listing. This article is part of the wiki infrastructure, as any valid article that has been around for a number of years should be, and removing it would damage that. This might be applicable to the
339:. The only links are to his on site and interviews on web sites that few people have heard of. There are people in the games industry with far higher profile, who have been interviewed by mainstream media, quoted regularly and often, and played a part in shaping the industry, but still aren't notable enough for their own article — Matt Booty former CEO of Midway is one. A Google search turns up nothing else of note, only those things already in the article.
445:
that many people would recognize" are hear-say and irrelevant. However, in the sources defense, I will say this. Other
Knowledge (XXG) articles can not be used to determine notability, but that can be indicative that people are interested in the subject enough to make them. Almost all of the sources have Knowledge (XXG) articles about them. See
401:
with regards to the sources on this article. All of them seem to adhere to it. They are independent of the subject (except for the resume), none contain any libellous or contentious statements, they are from news sources which can be assumed to be reliable (they are used as sources on other articles,
444:
Okay, thank you for being clear about the problem now. When you posted this message there were about two secondary sources on the article, and I did a web crawl last night and found and added some more. Check the citations on the article. I still say statements such as that the sources are "not ones
240:
I find this nomination frankly ridiculous. This article is linked to numerous times on other articles and the subject has a profound internet presence, see the external links on the article or put the name "Ryan C. Gordon", "Ryan Gordon", or "icculus" into Google. Also the fact that this article has
414:
guidelines, as it would damage
Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage in a similar fashion to firing a cannon ball at a load-bearing wall currently supporting a free-standing building. Granted this should never be used as a main argument, and I do not intend to use it as such, but it should still be mentioned.
313:
which is linked to in the article. Gordon doesn't find work like most programming contractors, work finds him. My family has been in the consulting trade, who know that when companies go knocking on your door, rather than you trying to find work yourself means something. His sheer number of notable
507:
Okay, I have written a proper biography section now, hope this helps solve some of your complaints about the article. It needs more information about his work between 2004 - 2007, and it barely mentions his Mac ports at all (mostly because I do not know much about them or where to find sources for
429:
Notability requires good secondary sources. The sources here are all interviews, i.e. primary sources, and they are also from relatively obscure sources - not ones that many people would recognise, even in gaming. And as you seem to agree
Knowledge (XXG) itself is not a reliable source.
260:
Agreed, ridiculous. Icculus has been interviewed by various technical, Linux, gaming, and even hardware websites and is mentioned in several books on Linux (if not by name, but by titles he has ported). He is a known figure head in
582:- well-known in the Linux/gaming community, and the article seems to have plenty of third-party sources to establish notability. Linux (and Linux gaming) may not be as dominant as Windows, but it's still plenty notable.
166:
371:
If he is a "leader in his field" then that should be in the article, if it can be referenced. But references in other
Knowledge (XXG) articles is largely irrelevant as it's not a reliable source. See
353:
First off, statements such as "web sites that few people have heard of" are hear-say and irrelevant. Just because not everyone has heard of a certain news-source does not mean it is not relevant.
127:
486:
It looks better now though it still looks unencyclopaedic - too little text. I found a couple of links myself when searching yesterday, though I don't know if they are of use:
160:
543:
217:
402:
which seems to add community belief in their credibility), and offer enough coverage to allow a presumption of notability. Unless you post reasons
379:. And A web search on its own shows nothing, it's the quality of the references it finds, which should then be used in the article. See e.g.
490:
100:
95:
17:
104:
487:
87:
181:
407:
148:
411:
607:
36:
406:
you think they do not follow the guidelines, you are threatening to be acting in a similar fashion as example six of
142:
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
570:
497:
435:
388:
344:
319:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
197:
Subject does not appear to be notable. I did add a notability template to the article, but it was removed.
592:
574:
555:
531:
517:
501:
470:
439:
424:
392:
366:
348:
323:
250:
229:
206:
138:
69:
314:
clients, which is documented here and elsewhere on
Knowledge (XXG) establish notability in its own right.
372:
188:
492:. Anyway, I'll redact my delete vote as my main concern, the lack of references, has been addressed.
566:
493:
431:
384:
340:
315:
174:
91:
551:
202:
461:. I have also seen Blue's News in print media, though I am shocked it does not have an article.
383:. My apologies if the links seem Wikilawyerly but they make the points far better than I could.
241:
existed for over three years adds a certain amount of established notability in its own right.
589:
294:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
527:
513:
466:
454:
420:
362:
277:(the founder of commercial Linux gaming, mentioned in hundreds of articles such as those in
246:
154:
56:
398:
380:
376:
336:
62:
302:
310:
83:
75:
547:
278:
274:
198:
584:
458:
286:
262:
221:
121:
523:
509:
462:
416:
358:
242:
50:
450:
290:
266:
265:
and Mac gaming, which can be found by a simple search at any website such as
298:
522:
I have expanded it now to cover the year gap, and found a few new sources.
446:
354:
270:
282:
600:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:
397:
I am sorry, but I do not see your point with linking to the
117:
113:
109:
173:
187:
375:. The point about the quality of sources is from
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
610:). No further edits should be made to this page.
218:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
216:: This debate has been included in the
335:Based on that article he does not meet
281:, and he was important in Loki too!),
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
508:them), but is is more than a start.
24:
1:
593:03:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
575:23:45, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
556:01:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
532:07:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
518:07:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
502:22:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
471:22:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
440:00:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
425:23:27, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
399:General notability guideline
393:08:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
367:01:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
349:22:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
324:01:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
251:00:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
230:00:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
207:21:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
70:10:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
627:
305:), and even did work for
603:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
381:WP:BIO#Invalid criteria
524:Comrade Hamish Wilson
510:Comrade Hamish Wilson
463:Comrade Hamish Wilson
417:Comrade Hamish Wilson
359:Comrade Hamish Wilson
243:Comrade Hamish Wilson
273:. He has worked for
591:
583:
408:Gaming the system
309:according to one
295:Unreal Tournament
232:
68:
618:
605:
587:
455:Inside Mac Games
412:Ignore all rules
212:
192:
191:
177:
125:
107:
65:
59:
49:
44:The result was
34:
626:
625:
621:
620:
619:
617:
616:
615:
614:
608:deletion review
601:
585:
565:HIGHLY NOTABLE
285:(Linux port of
134:
98:
82:
79:
63:
57:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
624:
622:
613:
612:
596:
595:
577:
559:
558:
537:
536:
535:
534:
494:JohnBlackburne
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
432:JohnBlackburne
385:JohnBlackburne
341:JohnBlackburne
327:
326:
316:Comrade Graham
303:America's Army
254:
253:
234:
233:
195:
194:
131:
84:Ryan C. Gordon
78:
76:Ryan C. Gordon
73:
51:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
623:
611:
609:
604:
598:
597:
594:
590:
588:
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
539:
538:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
405:
400:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
329:
328:
325:
321:
317:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:series), the
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:Linux Journal
276:
275:Loki Software
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
239:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
66:
60:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
602:
599:
579:
562:
540:
485:
459:ars technica
403:
331:
330:
287:Google Earth
257:
237:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
45:
43:
31:
28:
373:WP:CIRCULAR
161:free images
451:LinuxGames
291:Epic Games
267:LinuxGames
58:have a cup
311:interview
299:U.S. Army
548:Ret.Prof
447:Phoronix
355:Phoronix
271:Phoronix
199:Rockfang
128:View log
586:Cocytus
544:Notable
222:MrKIA11
167:WP refs
155:scholar
101:protect
96:history
457:, and
377:WP:GNG
337:WP:GNG
332:Delete
283:Google
139:Google
105:delete
52:Coffee
301:(for
263:Linux
182:JSTOR
143:books
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
580:Keep
571:talk
563:Keep
552:talk
541:Keep
528:talk
514:talk
498:talk
489:and
467:talk
436:talk
421:talk
389:talk
363:talk
345:talk
320:talk
307:NASA
258:Keep
247:talk
238:Keep
226:talk
214:Note
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
48:. --
46:keep
567:Kc4
404:why
289:),
269:or
189:TWL
126:– (
67://
64:ark
61://
55://
573:)
554:)
546:-
530:)
516:)
500:)
469:)
453:,
449:,
438:)
423:)
391:)
365:)
347:)
322:)
249:)
228:)
220:.
205:)
169:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
569:(
550:(
526:(
512:(
496:(
465:(
434:(
419:(
387:(
361:(
343:(
318:(
293:(
245:(
224:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.