326:"Planned expansion"? The current info in the article is the ONLY info that has been confirmed in the article, and even some of the info that is currently in is unsourced. So the "expansion" won't happen until WWE announced more about it. I am not against the article being re-created in the future, but the article was NOT ready to be moved back into the mainspace.
862:: There are many pages on Knowledge (XXG) with less information than this and they stay on so why should this be an exception? Also it's going to debut in a few weeks anyway, so if it was deleted it would just cause people to have to re-create it again and it would just be a waste of time deleting this.
303:
Talk about not even giving the article a chance. It's currently in the middle of a planned expansion and plus with less than two weeks until its planned debut, it's pretty pointless even considering deletion if without a doubt it will be recreated with more information likely to be revealed in such a
199:
Not enough info to warrant a article. The only confirmed info is the name, date, and possible people who will be on the roster. I would compare this to a movie article where the only known info is the basic plot of the movie and its location. In a couple of weeks there will be enough info, but not in
354:
Well considering Bullet used both the in use and under construction templates yesterday shows to me that he was in the middle of expanding the article, and he even mentioned here that he was planning to do so. I've already offered help with the article, and I believe it can be expanded even with the
794:
I've made my feelings known earlier. But this TJ Spike seems to have a bee in his bonnet about it. It clearly is something that he cares deeply about and it is obvious that he has real passion about it. While we may all see this as a sad and pointless exercise, TJ Spike clearly doees not. So lets
713:
Yes it is just speculation and hyperbole. How the blazes is it a major change for WWE? From what little info is known, WWE is basically just taking their FCW TV show (which airs in the Tampa area) and airing it nationwide. Yeah, that is a BIG change (:rolleyes:). Also, changing chairmans at a
355:
mystique WWE are current displaying when promoting the show. For instance, a production/show history section could easily be placed in right now charting last week's announcement of the show, not to mention briefly about the naming controversy with the
Scottish feeder fed. --
876:
Even though there is 1 day left in the AFD, I am withdrawing based on the info WWE released today. TODAY is when the show finally deserved an article, before today it should have been deleted. To the above user, OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a failed argument that is always rejected.
445:
Yeah, I have already countered all of the arguments. There is no good reason to keep the article, all the known info can fit in a small 1 paragraph in the ECW article until there is enough info to justify the show having a article (which it doesn't yet).
685:
It's not speculation or hyperbole. It's fact. It's no different to a change in chairman for a company for instance. It's a major change. The only way you can object is to claim that the change isn't happening at all - which would be a ridiculous claim.
46:
Withdrawn. Today is when the show finally had enough info to deserve an article (despite the opinions of those below, the article should have been deleted before today because the article failed WP:N) because WWE issued a press release detailing the
734:*shakes head* I'll leave it to the admin who makes the final decision on whether to delete or keep. It's quite clear that we have two completely different definitions of "major change". Let's see who's right in effect when the decision is made.
617:
It's speculation that its a major change. This seems silly to keep a article that clearly fails WP:N just because info will be coming soon. It should not have been de-userfied yet, it should be userfied again and maybe brought back in a week.
714:
company doesn't always mean a change in a companies direction (yet alone a major one). It's ridiculous to claim it's a change at all for WWE based on what we know, it's totally ludicrous to claim that it's gonna be a major one.
795:
just let him delete it. It will be recreated in a week or so anyway. At least this way, we can let Mr. Spike get on with his life without him having to worry about this terrible terrible situation any longer than he has to. --
168:
385:
I hardly think the
Scottish one is worth noting considering how unnotable it is. I'm not sure what history you are talking about as everything about the history of the show is already in it.
123:
638:
Speculation? Vince McMahon announces that ECW is going off the air and the talent are all free agents, and you deny what is obviously a major change as speculation? *dumbfounded*
226:
492:. No sense in deleting it unless the show is canceled within a couple months. In all fairness, the article shouldn't have been created until the first airing...at least.
431:- as stated above. The page will be recreated within the next two weeks anyway. There is no good reason why it should be deleted. It would be pointless to remove it now. --
776:
even the nominator admits this will be brought back in a week, it's both silly and pointless to delete it for a week, there are much better ways to improve wikipedia.
258:
569:- The show is debuting in less than two weeks, and there's enough verifiable information to justify at least a stub (which is where the article stands at present).
162:
290:- Simply because it's going to be recreated a week from now anyway. The current information on the article is supported by reliable sources according to
294:
and the article itself was just in the middle of a significant expansion with other established users having offered to contribute. Just my 2 cents.
128:
586:- Has been confirmed as WWE programming, and represents a major change in direction within the organisation. That by itself is a pass for
17:
811:
509:-- what's the point in deletion when the show airs in a week and half? Especially being a series aired on a NBC-owned network.--
907:
36:
183:
96:
91:
150:
800:
436:
100:
906:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
83:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
472:
845:, which would be the only reason to delete it. Less than ten days until it debuts why delete then recreate?
850:
574:
144:
796:
432:
867:
747:
699:
651:
603:
497:
842:
140:
665:
The speculation is that it represents a major change in the direction of WWE (which is hyperbole).
417:
176:
892:
871:
854:
831:
804:
789:
756:
729:
708:
680:
660:
633:
612:
578:
561:
543:
501:
484:
461:
440:
423:
400:
372:
341:
321:
295:
279:
247:
215:
64:
885:
722:
673:
626:
555:
454:
393:
334:
272:
240:
208:
57:
814:, please. I might not agree with him on this topic, but there was certainly no need for that. --
190:
846:
823:
570:
480:
364:
313:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
784:
863:
741:
693:
645:
597:
532:
493:
291:
411:
587:
880:
717:
668:
621:
550:
449:
388:
329:
267:
235:
203:
156:
52:
818:
476:
359:
308:
87:
117:
777:
514:
548:
Keep its well sourced there will be more added to it in a week or so.--
79:
71:
900:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
175:
471:. Only this time, remember Knowledge (XXG) is not a
189:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
910:). No further edits should be made to this page.
227:list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions
8:
259:list of Sports-related deletion discussions
253:
221:
257:: This debate has been included in the
225:: This debate has been included in the
841:, give the refs I think we can ignore
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
864:The C of E. God Save The Queen!
1:
893:20:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
872:17:13, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
855:01:16, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
832:11:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
805:11:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
790:04:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
757:22:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
730:00:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
709:00:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
681:00:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
661:23:54, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
634:23:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
613:22:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
579:22:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
562:23:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
544:22:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
502:12:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
485:03:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
462:00:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
441:23:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
424:23:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
401:00:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
373:00:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
342:22:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
322:22:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
296:21:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
280:21:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
248:21:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
216:21:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
65:20:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
843:whether or not it may happen
927:
903:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
812:No personal attacks
590:so it should stay.
200:its current state.
44:The result was
539:
529:
282:
262:
250:
230:
918:
905:
890:
888:
883:
830:
829:
826:
821:
797:Bravo Plantation
787:
781:
755:
752:
746:
740:
727:
725:
720:
707:
704:
698:
692:
678:
676:
671:
659:
656:
650:
644:
631:
629:
624:
611:
608:
602:
596:
560:
558:
553:
540:
535:
528:
527:
524:
520:
517:
512:
459:
457:
452:
433:Bravo Plantation
420:
414:
398:
396:
391:
371:
370:
367:
362:
339:
337:
332:
320:
319:
316:
311:
277:
275:
270:
263:
245:
243:
238:
231:
213:
211:
206:
194:
193:
179:
131:
121:
103:
62:
60:
55:
34:
926:
925:
921:
920:
919:
917:
916:
915:
914:
908:deletion review
901:
886:
881:
879:
824:
819:
816:
815:
785:
779:
750:
744:
738:
735:
723:
718:
716:
702:
696:
690:
687:
674:
669:
667:
654:
648:
642:
639:
627:
622:
620:
606:
600:
594:
591:
556:
551:
549:
541:
534:
525:
522:
518:
515:
513:
455:
450:
448:
418:
412:
394:
389:
387:
365:
360:
357:
356:
335:
330:
328:
314:
309:
306:
305:
273:
268:
266:
241:
236:
234:
209:
204:
202:
136:
127:
94:
78:
75:
58:
53:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
924:
922:
913:
912:
896:
895:
874:
857:
835:
834:
808:
807:
792:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
581:
564:
546:
533:
504:
487:
466:
465:
464:
426:
405:
404:
403:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
347:
346:
345:
344:
298:
284:
283:
251:
197:
196:
133:
129:AfD statistics
74:
69:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
923:
911:
909:
904:
898:
897:
894:
891:
889:
884:
875:
873:
869:
865:
861:
858:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
837:
836:
833:
828:
827:
822:
813:
810:
809:
806:
802:
798:
793:
791:
788:
783:
782:
775:
772:
758:
754:
753:
749:
743:
733:
732:
731:
728:
726:
721:
712:
711:
710:
706:
705:
701:
695:
684:
683:
682:
679:
677:
672:
664:
663:
662:
658:
657:
653:
647:
637:
636:
635:
632:
630:
625:
616:
615:
614:
610:
609:
605:
599:
589:
585:
582:
580:
576:
572:
568:
565:
563:
559:
554:
547:
545:
542:
538:
531:
530:
521:
508:
505:
503:
499:
495:
491:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
463:
460:
458:
453:
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
427:
425:
421:
415:
409:
406:
402:
399:
397:
392:
384:
383:
382:
381:
374:
369:
368:
363:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
343:
340:
338:
333:
325:
324:
323:
318:
317:
312:
304:short time.--
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
286:
285:
281:
278:
276:
271:
260:
256:
252:
249:
246:
244:
239:
228:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
212:
207:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
66:
63:
61:
56:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
902:
899:
878:
859:
847:Darrenhusted
838:
817:
778:
773:
737:
736:
715:
689:
688:
666:
641:
640:
619:
593:
592:
583:
571:Jeff Silvers
566:
536:
511:
510:
506:
489:
473:crystal ball
468:
447:
428:
407:
386:
358:
327:
307:
300:
287:
265:
254:
233:
222:
201:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
163:free images
494:Kjscotte34
410:per nom.
413:JBsupreme
124:View log
169:WP refs
157:scholar
97:protect
92:history
80:WWE NXT
72:WWE NXT
408:Delete
141:Google
101:delete
887:Spyke
724:Spyke
675:Spyke
628:Spyke
552:Steam
456:Spyke
395:Spyke
336:Spyke
292:WP:PW
274:Spyke
242:Spyke
210:Spyke
184:JSTOR
145:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
59:Spyke
16:<
868:talk
860:Keep
851:talk
839:Keep
820:Θaks
801:talk
786:-DK
780:MPJ
774:Keep
748:Punk
742:Just
700:Punk
694:Just
652:Punk
646:Just
604:Punk
598:Just
588:WP:N
584:Keep
575:talk
567:Keep
557:Iron
507:Keep
498:talk
490:Keep
481:talk
477:Jair
469:Keep
437:talk
429:Keep
419:talk
361:Θaks
310:Θaks
301:Keep
288:Keep
255:Note
223:Note
177:FENS
151:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
47:show
825:ter
537:503
366:ter
315:ter
191:TWL
126:•
122:– (
882:TJ
870:)
853:)
803:)
751:!!
739:!!
719:TJ
703:!!
691:!!
670:TJ
655:!!
643:!!
623:TJ
607:!!
595:!!
577:)
519:ru
500:)
483:)
475:.
451:TJ
439:)
422:)
390:TJ
331:TJ
269:TJ
261:.
237:TJ
229:.
205:TJ
171:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
54:TJ
49:.
866:(
849:(
799:(
745:a
697:a
649:a
601:a
573:(
526:o
523:c
516:T
496:(
479:(
435:(
416:(
264:—
232:—
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.