560:: I have made some changes to this article to remove OR and synthesis, and to add material from multiple sources that directly reflects what the sources contain about the concept. I have also renamed the article back to its original title. I have not made all the changes necessary yet; this may take a lot of time, due to the length of this article. The bottom line: Per
396:
can be cleaned up. Meanwhile, all the "deletes" here seem to be a debate that this is the same as laziness or just hope to reach a consensus. They do not really give a good reason for deleting. The "keeps" actually give good arguments and try to show where actual information on the concept can be
210:
Original research. "Work aversion disorder" as a concept does not exist in any reliable sources. Google scholar comes up empty. Web site devoted to supposed disorder is now defunct. I suspect it was owned by the same person who authored this. As a disclosure, I removed many references that merely
321:
back to "Work
Aversion." This was the original title of the article, and it was properly sourced back then. Someone along the way changed it to "Work Aversion Disorder," and that's where everything went wrong. I returned these references; they should stay here for now.
415:
The article is pure original research and synthesis. It's a common phrase that doesn't exist as a distinct concept of its own outside of
Knowledge (XXG). Those are fine reasons for deleting. We don't make up new concepts and then write articles about them.
80:
179:
467:
information. It has been covered even in ancient sources. I can see rewriting the article about work aversion (not disorder), then including a section on disorders that may lead to work aversion.
75:
434:, an article is not deleted if it has some problems that can be cleaned up. I know you feel this is purely synthesis, but it is only partially. This is surely a surmountable problem.
48:. I agree the original name was not a good choice, and the initial impression the article gave was not very positive. But the consensus after the name change was clearly to keep
488:
may not be notable. But the concept of Work
Aversion is. In fact, there are entire articles and sections of books on it. This page should be renamed to the original title or to
173:
139:
134:
505:
107:
102:
493:
111:
501:
348:
the term." Sources that merely use the phrase "work aversion" do not constitute coverage, and shouldn't be cited as sources in the way that you did.
94:
610:
591:
573:
550:
531:
517:
476:
459:: Sorry, it was me who renamed it. I did so because of a page on something called Work Aversion Disorder. Work aversion (not disorder) is a
443:
425:
410:
357:
331:
309:
280:
263:
246:
224:
59:
384:
The nom is trying to imply deception, but this actually seems deceptive to me the way this was done. The nom's rationales are this, zero
497:
194:
17:
161:
340:"To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers
155:
625:
36:
98:
151:
472:
522:
Merely using the phrase is not coverage of the phrase as a distinct concept and does not establish notability.
624:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
212:
201:
305:
90:
65:
561:
468:
398:
393:
167:
513:
276:
187:
546:
301:
385:
569:
439:
406:
327:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
492:. From there, the OR can be cleaned up. Sources using the words "Work Aversion" can be found
489:
376:
Please note that the nom has renamed the essay linked and used to justify its deletion from
211:
mentioned the words "aversion to work" in various unrelated contexts. Suspect that was just
431:
362:
337:
582:
is the synthesis. You can't edit that out of the article, it's fundamentally flawed.
389:
606:
587:
527:
509:
421:
353:
272:
220:
464:
460:
234:
542:
55:
565:
435:
402:
323:
238:
128:
237:. The last AfD has no consensus, but I hope we can get to some decision now.
602:
583:
523:
417:
349:
216:
254:
50:
541:: There are plenty of sources about this, just under a different name.
257:
isn't a disorder. If it is, I need therapy, but I'm too lazy for that.
215:
as a result of the previous AfD to make the concept appear notable.
618:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:- while "Work aversion" has some cites, this can not even be
81:
Articles for deletion/Work aversion disorder (2nd nomination)
601:: as per rename and continue to improve. Well done Hellno2.
500:. Sources using the term "aversion to work" can be found
369:. This article is NOT about a neologism. It is about a
124:
120:
116:
186:
200:
388:(not considered a valid reason for deletion), and
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
628:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
564:, I do believe this article is salvageable.
76:Articles for deletion/Work aversion disorder
373:, so therefore, WP:NEO does not apply here.
484:: As others have mentioned, Work Aversion
73:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
344:the term, not books and papers that
72:
24:
1:
300:Per the work done Hellno2.
645:
611:10:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
592:13:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
574:04:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
551:16:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
532:18:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
518:23:14, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
477:18:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
444:22:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
426:18:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
411:13:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
358:16:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
332:16:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
310:04:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
281:01:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
264:00:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
247:00:35, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
60:03:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
225:21:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
621:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
463:concept with plenty of
580:subject of the article
91:Work aversion disorder
71:AfDs for this article:
66:Work aversion disorder
432:Reasons for deletion
382:"Window dressing."
365:is strictly about
44:The result was
262:
636:
623:
490:Aversion to work
261:
260:
205:
204:
190:
142:
132:
114:
34:
644:
643:
639:
638:
637:
635:
634:
633:
632:
626:deletion review
619:
469:Pink cloudy sky
258:
213:window dressing
147:
138:
105:
89:
86:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
642:
640:
631:
630:
614:
613:
596:
595:
594:
554:
553:
536:
535:
534:
479:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
374:
312:
284:
266:
249:
208:
207:
144:
140:AfD statistics
85:
84:
83:
78:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
641:
629:
627:
622:
616:
615:
612:
608:
604:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
556:
555:
552:
548:
544:
540:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:According to
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:"Bombardment"
375:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
320:
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
302:Beach drifter
299:
296:
295:
290:
289:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
265:
256:
253:
250:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
145:
141:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
82:
79:
77:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
620:
617:
598:
579:
562:WP:BATHWATER
557:
538:
485:
481:
456:
392:, which per
381:
377:
370:
366:
345:
341:
318:
314:
297:
293:
292:
287:
286:
268:
251:
230:
209:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
397:found (see
271:per above (
174:free images
465:verifiable
399:WP:PROVEIT
394:WP:PROBLEM
367:neologisms
510:Tatterfly
273:GregJackP
259:Exit2DOS
543:Dew Kane
486:Disorder
386:WP:GHITS
288:REDIRECT
255:Laziness
235:verified
135:View log
566:Hellno2
558:Comment
461:notable
436:Hellno2
403:Hellno2
371:concept
324:Hellno2
239:Bearian
180:WP refs
168:scholar
108:protect
103:history
363:WP:NEO
338:WP:NEO
319:Rename
294:Delete
269:Delete
252:Delete
231:Delete
152:Google
112:delete
496:and
390:WP:OR
342:about
336:From
195:JSTOR
156:books
129:views
121:watch
117:links
56:talk
16:<
607:talk
603:Fanx
599:Keep
588:talk
584:Gigs
578:The
570:talk
547:talk
539:Keep
528:talk
524:Gigs
514:talk
506:here
504:and
502:here
498:here
494:here
482:Keep
473:talk
457:Keep
440:talk
422:talk
418:Gigs
407:talk
354:talk
350:Gigs
328:talk
317:and
315:Keep
306:talk
298:Keep
277:talk
243:talk
221:talk
217:Gigs
188:FENS
162:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
46:keep
401:).
380:to
346:use
202:TWL
137:•
133:– (
51:DGG
609:)
590:)
572:)
549:)
530:)
516:)
508:.
475:)
442:)
424:)
409:)
356:)
330:)
308:)
279:)
245:)
223:)
182:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
58:)
605:(
586:(
568:(
545:(
526:(
512:(
471:(
438:(
420:(
405:(
352:(
326:(
304:(
291:,
283:)
275:(
241:(
219:(
206:)
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
146:(
143:)
131:)
93:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.