602:, as was stated as a reason for the revert to the redirect, the main article for Ultima does not contain more detailed information about this topic, and it would be best for page sizes to keep this article as if it were a split article from my point of view. It seems notable enough, and arguing that an article has little content is not a reason for deletion. Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress, we should not delete pages because they are not complete. --
397:. Disruptive nomination. Nominator wanted to redirect page (meaning he believes the name is a plausible search term), but two users disagreed and restored the article. Now he's arguing for deletion without redirect, contradicting the belief that there's a plausible search term involved. There seems to be more spite/pique here than is warranted. And the discussion regarding the
336:
The articles are completely dead and badly written. Such a "long lived" characters have only had thirteen edits this year. There is no reason to believe discussion is necessary (though I did ask if the Lord
British article had any potential) with articles in that state. I'll get the number consensus
307:
I see you took it upon yourself to go around replacing articles for notable characters in the Ultima series, with redirects as well. Do you believe that all those who have worked on these articles, for the years they've been around, will agree with your opinion they should be eliminated, replaced
292:
No, but they do determine the proper way to manage such articles. The same thing was done with the Ultima
Underworld "series", so this isn't any different. You do realize that you are arguing over absolutely nothing, right? It's the same exact content as what's already in the main article.
215:
It is a perfectly notable series, two of the games made, and a third canceled. The number of games made in a series, doesn't determine whether or not the article is valid. I have added information to the article, finding an interview a developer did, and using that as a reference.
698:
is notable, though I'm not sure how to best handle this particular instance. I'm not sure if there's any reason to keep a "sub-series" as a separate article when the main article could pretty much do. In any case, I don't see why this should be deleted.
248:
If a spin-off series can fit within the main article, then that is it. It would have to take up a lot of space in order to actually warrant an article. If you don't agree with that, I suggest that you bring it up with the video game project.
351:
If the games stop being made quite a number of years ago, then chances are, there isn't a lot of things that needed to be edited, nothing new coming out. How active an article is, does not determine where or not it should be deleted.
675:
votes rather than arguments in rapid fire fashion across multiple AfDs. We expect participants in these discussions to review the actual individual articles under discussion and the comments made by those above. Sincerely,
263:
Policy is not determined by the video game project. The games are Ultima only in name, using entirely different artwork and a totally different feel for play. They aren't just a spin off, but notable in their own right.
162:
419:
The amazing thing about redirects is that they do not need to actually contain old, useless content. They can be recreated afterward, so there is nothing wrong with wanting such content deleted.
123:
48:. Though many of the keep votes are a bit lacking, there is quite clearly no consensus for deletion. Editorial decisions should be discussed at the article's talk page. –
156:
531:
90:
85:
562:
471:
94:
17:
77:
406:
177:
144:
710:
486:
729:
36:
507:
197:. There is no actual content here anyway, especially due to the fact that there are only two actual games within it.
402:
138:
728:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
714:
680:
655:
636:
611:
588:
570:
543:
517:
498:
479:
456:
428:
410:
375:
346:
331:
302:
287:
258:
239:
206:
59:
566:
475:
134:
433:
And your redirects can be reverted as well, so there is nothing wrong with wanting such content preserved.
650:
494:
57:
184:
81:
668:
170:
664:
660:
706:
645:
630:
582:
539:
490:
470:
if it's a minor series then why do two of the games of the series have articles of their own?
398:
150:
50:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
607:
434:
353:
309:
265:
217:
73:
65:
672:
620:
512:
194:
193:
This is a minor spin-off "series" that is already covered within the fourth paragraph of
677:
424:
342:
298:
254:
202:
701:
626:
578:
535:
111:
603:
575:
You argument is still invalid - minor series are not necessarily non-notable.--
504:
623:- contains barely any content and is unnecessary as a standalone article.--
420:
338:
294:
250:
198:
308:
with redirects? Why not discuss it on those talk pages before acting?
503:
No, but explaining why the nominator's claim appears inaccurate is. --
553:
OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not apply to my argument. I'm not pointing to
663:
is not a valid reason for deletion. Please stop copy and pasting
722:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
337:
at some point tomorrow, so you won't have to worry about that.
118:
107:
103:
99:
169:
401:
seres doesn't line up with the nominator's comments.
183:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
732:). No further edits should be made to this page.
561:If you read my argument, it should be evident.
532:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
530:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
715:09:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
60:17:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
749:
681:17:57, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
656:07:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
637:04:37, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
612:08:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
589:04:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
571:06:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
544:15:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
518:16:55, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
499:12:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
480:04:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
457:01:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
429:01:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
411:01:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
376:01:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
347:01:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
332:01:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
303:01:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
288:01:04, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
259:01:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
240:00:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
207:00:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
725:Please do not modify it.
195:Ultima (series)#Overview
32:Please do not modify it.
489:is not an argument. --
403:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
487:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
651:wanna get fluffed?
44:The result was
654:
634:
586:
546:
399:Ultima Underworld
740:
727:
648:
644:per nomination.
625:
577:
557:I'm pointing to
526:
515:
510:
453:
450:
447:
444:
441:
438:
372:
369:
366:
363:
360:
357:
328:
325:
322:
319:
316:
313:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
188:
187:
173:
121:
115:
97:
74:Worlds of Ultima
66:Worlds of Ultima
53:
34:
748:
747:
743:
742:
741:
739:
738:
737:
736:
730:deletion review
723:
635:
621:Ultima (series)
587:
513:
508:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
436:
370:
367:
364:
361:
358:
355:
326:
323:
320:
317:
314:
311:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
234:
231:
228:
225:
222:
219:
130:
117:
88:
72:
69:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
746:
744:
735:
734:
718:
717:
685:
684:
683:
639:
624:
614:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
576:
559:the same stuff
548:
547:
523:
522:
521:
520:
483:
482:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
414:
413:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
243:
242:
191:
190:
127:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
745:
733:
731:
726:
720:
719:
716:
712:
708:
704:
703:
697:
693:
689:
686:
682:
679:
674:
670:
666:
662:
659:
658:
657:
652:
647:
643:
640:
638:
632:
628:
622:
618:
615:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
597:
590:
584:
580:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
563:76.66.193.221
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
524:
519:
516:
511:
506:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
472:76.66.193.221
469:
466:
465:
458:
455:
454:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
417:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
377:
374:
373:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
335:
334:
333:
330:
329:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
286:
285:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
241:
238:
237:
214:
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
724:
721:
700:
695:
691:
687:
646:Doctorfluffy
641:
616:
599:
558:
554:
527:
491:Magioladitis
467:
435:
394:
354:
310:
266:
218:
212:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
52:Juliancolton
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
669:WP:ITSCRUFT
555:other stuff
157:free images
665:WP:PERNOM
661:WP:PERNOM
678:A Nobody
617:Redirect
124:View log
702:wwwwolf
627:ZXCVBNM
579:ZXCVBNM
536:MrKIA11
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
711:growls
694:. The
673:WP:JNN
671:, and
642:Delete
604:Taelus
135:Google
119:delete
95:delete
707:barks
696:topic
692:Merge
452:Focus
371:Focus
327:Focus
283:Focus
235:Focus
178:JSTOR
139:books
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
688:Keep
631:TALK
608:talk
600:Keep
583:TALK
567:talk
540:talk
528:Note
495:talk
476:talk
468:Keep
425:talk
407:talk
395:Keep
343:talk
299:talk
255:talk
213:Keep
203:talk
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
46:keep
690:or
619:To
505:Kiz
421:TTN
339:TTN
295:TTN
251:TTN
199:TTN
185:TWL
713:)
699:--
676:--
667:,
610:)
569:)
542:)
534:.
497:)
478:)
427:)
409:)
345:)
301:)
257:)
205:)
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
56:|
709:/
705:(
653:)
649:(
633:)
629:(
606:(
585:)
581:(
565:(
538:(
514:r
509:o
493:(
474:(
449:m
446:a
443:e
440:r
437:D
423:(
405:(
368:m
365:a
362:e
359:r
356:D
341:(
324:m
321:a
318:e
315:r
312:D
297:(
280:m
277:a
274:e
271:r
268:D
253:(
232:m
229:a
226:e
223:r
220:D
201:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.