Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Walk for Values - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

289:
fundamentally holds that "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability."
255:
As far as I can see there are two references mentioned in the article itself. One of those being from the website of Legislative Assembly of Ontario gives it significance, and the other reference in a radio channel gives it media coverage.
187:
Reasonably popular event. Organized in 12 cities in Canada with 5,000 participants, replicated in 6 cities in Australia and few other cities in the United States. But, sure the article needs change in tone of writing.
133:, and all the hits come from the several affiliated websites pushing this walk. The article reads like a promotional brochure for the event, unsurprising since this was created by an SPA ( 320:, because it still is too small of an event. 5,000 participants is nothing compared to some of the more notable events that go on around the World, like Oktoberfest in Germany etc. 122: 239:
What evidence do you have to offer to back up the assertion that this is a popular event? Articles about it in the newspapers? Any media coverage at all?
170:
any COI spam should be speedied honestly.. if the topic is really valuable someone who doesn't have a personal stake will add the information.--
171: 89: 84: 225: 93: 17: 285:
The first reference is the type of casual mention of warm and fuzzy things all legislators make, the second a public service ad.
76: 271: 221: 203: 358: 36: 357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
340: 298: 275: 247: 207: 179: 175: 161: 58: 259: 191: 80: 329: 72: 64: 263: 213: 195: 267: 217: 199: 134: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
146: 286: 150: 138: 321: 130: 291: 240: 154: 49: 317: 313: 142: 110: 129:
Non-notable event. There are a few G-hits, but none turning up any
351:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
137:) for whom pushing this event is the sole Wiki activity. Fails 117: 106: 102: 98: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 361:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 312:This article does not have enough 24: 1: 378: 354:Please do not modify it. 341:17:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 299:20:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 276:19:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 248:12:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC) 208:20:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC) 180:16:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC) 162:15:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 59:23:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 226:few or no other edits 228:outside this topic. 44:The result was 278: 262:comment added by 229: 210: 194:comment added by 369: 356: 295: 257: 244: 211: 189: 158: 131:reliable sources 120: 114: 96: 56: 34: 377: 376: 372: 371: 370: 368: 367: 366: 365: 359:deletion review 352: 316:to consider it 293: 242: 156: 116: 87: 73:Walk for Values 71: 68: 65:Walk for Values 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 375: 373: 364: 363: 346: 344: 343: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 280: 279: 250: 231: 230: 182: 127: 126: 67: 62: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 374: 362: 360: 355: 349: 348: 347: 342: 339: 338: 335: 332: 328: 327: 324: 319: 315: 311: 308: 307: 300: 297: 296: 288: 284: 283: 282: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 254: 251: 249: 246: 245: 238: 235: 234: 233: 232: 227: 223: 219: 215: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 186: 183: 181: 177: 173: 172:137.186.84.54 169: 166: 165: 164: 163: 160: 159: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 124: 119: 112: 108: 104: 100: 95: 91: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 69: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 353: 350: 345: 336: 333: 330: 325: 322: 309: 292: 252: 241: 236: 184: 167: 155: 128: 52: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 258:—Preceding 224:) has made 190:—Preceding 145:, probably 318:verifiable 314:notability 294:RGTraynor 243:RGTraynor 157:RGTraynor 253:Response: 53:Wizardman 272:contribs 264:Compuneo 260:unsigned 237:Comment: 222:contribs 214:Compuneo 204:contribs 196:Compuneo 192:unsigned 135:User:W4V 123:View log 147:WP:SPAM 90:protect 85:history 310:Delete 287:WP:ORG 168:Delete 151:WP:COI 139:WP:ORG 118:delete 94:delete 46:delete 121:) – ( 111:views 103:watch 99:links 16:< 268:talk 218:talk 200:talk 185:Keep 176:talk 153:. 149:and 143:WP:V 107:logs 81:talk 77:edit 323:Raz 334:am 331:fl 326:or 274:) 270:• 220:• 212:— 206:) 202:• 178:) 141:, 109:| 105:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 83:| 79:| 48:. 337:e 266:( 216:( 198:( 174:( 125:) 115:( 113:) 75:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Wizardman
23:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Walk for Values
Walk for Values
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
reliable sources
User:W4V
WP:ORG
WP:V
WP:SPAM
WP:COI
 RGTraynor 
15:00, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
137.186.84.54
talk
16:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
Compuneo

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑