417:
Just to clarify, OBE does not stand for "Order of the
British Empire" but for "Officer of the Order of the British Empire", the second lowest of the five grades of that order. We have generally held that the three highest grades (GBE, KBE/DBE, CBE)
316:
The fact that he got an OBE implies that he did a lot more than the offices imply, which is why I would like to see some checks of
Birmingham or Warwickshire sources to see if there is more coverage of him. Have you been able to do any such checks?
220:
archive, where I found 3 letters to the editor from
Dingley, but no editorial coverage of him. However, editors with access to to Birmingham or Warwickshire local papers may find something ... which is why I thought that this deserved a full AFD.
339:
Actually it's pretty common for long-serving local councillors to get OBEs. He apparently specifically received it for "services to
Hospital Boards in Birmingham", which suggests he was probably also a long-serving member of one of them. --
163:
399:, then he'd qualify for an article regardless of his failure to pass POLITICIAN — but for an OBE, the basic notability of his original career still has to pass muster to get him in here.
266:
157:
116:
246:
123:
314:
Sure, the office and the candidacies do not confer a presumption of notability. However, the average alderman or failed candidate does not get an OBE.
89:
84:
93:
76:
329:
233:
293:, but these are ten a penny, and he was a parliamentary candidate three times, but there is agreement that this does not confer notability.
17:
178:
145:
456:
139:
40:
384:
206:
435:
412:
374:
349:
334:
302:
278:
258:
238:
58:
135:
325:
229:
80:
185:
370:
380:
362:
195:
72:
64:
298:
452:
36:
391:
and most populous class of the
British honours system, so it cannot automatically confer encyclopedic
431:
345:
318:
222:
56:
379:
Local city or county councillors do not qualify for
Knowledge (XXG) articles just for existing, per
171:
151:
423:
366:
408:
309:
294:
274:
254:
202:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
383:, nor do unelected candidates for higher office — and according to the main article on the
427:
341:
53:
392:
404:
270:
250:
110:
205:, but I contested the PROD and am sending it to AFD because his receipt of an
213:
be notable, either for his career in local government or on hospital boards.
290:
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
395:
on every single person named to it. Certainly if he'd been
106:
102:
98:
170:
198:, with no evidence so far of substantial coverage.
184:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
459:). No further edits should be made to this page.
267:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
194:Apparently non-notable local politician. Fails
426:#1, but the two lowest (OBE, MBE) do not. --
8:
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:list of England-related deletion discussions
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
403:unless much better sourcing can be added.
264:
244:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
422:provide inherent notability under
24:
289:The highest office he held was
1:
385:Order of the British Empire
476:
436:09:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
413:20:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
375:19:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
350:23:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
335:19:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
303:00:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
279:13:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
259:13:47, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
239:13:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
59:01:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
448:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
209:does suggest that he
73:Walter Leslie Dingley
65:Walter Leslie Dingley
361:-- He clearly fails
201:This was PRODded by
48:The result was
333:
281:
261:
237:
203:User:PatGallacher
467:
450:
387:, it's the most
324:
321:
313:
228:
225:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
475:
474:
470:
469:
468:
466:
465:
464:
463:
457:deletion review
446:
319:
307:
223:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
473:
471:
462:
461:
441:
440:
439:
438:
377:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
315:
283:
282:
262:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
472:
460:
458:
454:
449:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:WP:POLITICIAN
378:
376:
372:
368:
367:Peterkingiron
364:
363:WP:POLITICIAN
360:
357:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
331:
327:
323:
311:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
235:
231:
227:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
199:
197:
196:WP:POLITICIAN
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
447:
444:
419:
400:
396:
388:
358:
310:PatGallacher
295:PatGallacher
286:
217:
215:
210:
200:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
158:free images
428:Necrothesp
393:notability
342:Necrothesp
322:HairedGirl
226:HairedGirl
216:I checked
54:j⚛e decker
453:talk page
424:WP:ANYBIO
271:• Gene93k
251:• Gene93k
218:The Times
37:talk page
455:or in a
397:knighted
330:contribs
291:alderman
234:contribs
117:View log
39:or in a
405:Bearcat
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
401:Delete
389:junior
359:Delete
326:(talk)
287:Delete
230:(talk)
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
320:Brown
224:Brown
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
432:talk
409:talk
371:talk
365:.
346:talk
299:talk
275:talk
255:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
328:• (
232:• (
211:may
207:OBE
186:TWL
115:– (
434:)
420:do
411:)
373:)
348:)
317:--
301:)
277:)
269:.
257:)
249:.
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
430:(
407:(
369:(
344:(
332:)
312::
308:@
297:(
273:(
253:(
236:)
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.