254:, based on the large amount of publications listed (100+) on google scholar; the first article listed has been cited 106 times and the second 76 times. Academic Knowledge (XXG) articles can be very difficult to source, which is why this one has been stubbified substantially. This issue is compounded when the academic is involved at a foreign language university. Is the New York Times going to publish an article on Almawi's work on "Trends in the use of glucocorticoids in renal transplantation"? Not likely. But it is an important work in his field and his associates agree in that they've cited it over 100 times in their own studies. --
279:: 106 cites? Not bad but not particularly impressive. My various supervisors (none of which have wiki articles) have papers with 260+ (that paper was mentioned in non-academic media) to 4500+ cites. So, if this person research is important, evidence of it beyond google scholar should be not too hard to find. Who cited his research and why? I understand stubbifying vanity but some word could be said about this person's research and sourced, if the subject does pass
403:. For an active field with a fast publication cycle like biochemistry the citability data is not that impressive. In the absence of additional factors to indicate academic notability, I don't think there is quite enough here for passing
180:
306:
81:
135:
384:
H-index in biological fields is inflated simply because there are so many researchers in that field. It's like relying on Google hits for something related to open source.
361:#1. A large amount of sourceable information was removed from the article before it was nominated for AfD. Restoration of this in part may allay the justified concerns of
425:
What I'm saying here may not be relevant to this person. The same is true for computer science, biology and other applied fields. Knowledge (XXG) needs to update their
174:
140:
76:
284:
234:
450:. The earlier version of the article needs more sources but if that version is correct he is probably notable. I agree with Xxanthippe.
488:
Nsk92 points out that the citation level is not that impressive for the field in question, and associate prof rank, as well as lack of
17:
108:
103:
112:
502:
480:
459:
438:
416:
393:
378:
345:
321:
292:
267:
242:
220:
60:
95:
195:
162:
429:
to reflect such differences to favour depending upon situations. There must be some level of commonsense involved. thx.--
517:
36:
516:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
288:
238:
156:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
404:
152:
330:. Article doesn't contain any encyclopedic information on what this scholar is known for discovering.
374:
202:
340:
188:
500:
99:
455:
317:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
468:
426:
358:
280:
251:
230:
476:
434:
168:
492:
press coverage to be found in Gnews, suggests a relative lack of prominence in his field.
412:
370:
265:
389:
362:
332:
216:
51:
494:
91:
66:
451:
313:
129:
250:- for the same reasons put forth in the previous AFD. Almawi meets criteria 1 of
472:
430:
408:
255:
385:
212:
354:
471:, based on the large amount of publications listed and article #1. --
510:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
307:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
211:
Associate professor, no claim of notability in the article.
125:
121:
117:
187:
82:
Articles for deletion/Wassim Almawi (2nd nomination)
201:
353:. Top GS cites are 104, 76, 54, 39, 38 .... with
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
520:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
301:
305:: This debate has been included in the
74:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
229:- no indication that subject passes
77:Articles for deletion/Wassim Almawi
73:
24:
467:This person meets criteria #1 of
1:
537:
503:22:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
481:02:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
460:20:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
439:02:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
417:17:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
394:12:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
379:05:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
346:04:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
322:01:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
293:16:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
268:14:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
243:11:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
221:03:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
61:06:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
513:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:AfDs for this article:
499:
44:The result was
493:
324:
310:
59:
528:
515:
497:
367:
344:
337:
311:
263:
206:
205:
191:
143:
133:
115:
58:
56:
49:
34:
536:
535:
531:
530:
529:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:deletion review
511:
495:
363:
357:= 16. May pass
333:
331:
261:
148:
139:
106:
90:
87:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
534:
532:
523:
522:
506:
505:
483:
462:
444:
443:
442:
441:
420:
419:
398:
397:
396:
348:
325:
298:
297:
296:
295:
285:137.122.49.102
271:
270:
245:
235:137.122.49.102
209:
208:
145:
141:AfD statistics
86:
85:
84:
79:
71:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
533:
521:
519:
514:
508:
507:
504:
501:
498:
491:
487:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
445:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
382:
380:
376:
372:
368:
366:
360:
356:
352:
349:
347:
342:
338:
336:
329:
326:
323:
319:
315:
308:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
274:
273:
272:
269:
266:
264:
260:
259:
253:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
142:
137:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:Wassim Almawi
89:
88:
83:
80:
78:
75:
68:
67:Wassim Almawi
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
512:
509:
489:
485:
464:
447:
400:
364:
350:
334:
327:
302:
276:
257:
256:
247:
226:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
401:Weak delete
175:free images
371:Xxanthippe
54:Sandstein
465:Weak Keep
448:Weak keep
365:Abductive
341:reasoning
335:Abductive
314:• Gene93k
258:Jezebel's
136:View log
469:WP:PROF
452:MiRroar
427:WP:PROF
405:WP:PPOF
359:WP:Prof
355:h index
328:Comment
281:WP:PROF
277:Comment
252:WP:PROF
231:WP:PROF
181:WP refs
169:scholar
109:protect
104:history
486:Delete
473:kaeiou
431:kaeiou
227:Delete
153:Google
113:delete
409:Nsk92
262:Ponyo
196:JSTOR
157:books
130:views
122:watch
118:links
16:<
477:talk
456:talk
435:talk
413:talk
390:talk
386:Gigs
375:talk
351:Keep
318:talk
303:Note
289:talk
248:Keep
239:talk
217:talk
213:Gigs
189:FENS
163:news
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
496:Ray
490:any
312:--
283:.--
203:TWL
138:•
134:– (
479:)
458:)
437:)
415:)
407:.
392:)
381:.
377:)
369:.
320:)
309:.
291:)
241:)
233:--
219:)
183:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
48:.
475:(
454:(
433:(
411:(
388:(
373:(
343:)
339:(
316:(
287:(
237:(
215:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
132:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.