Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Wet paint sign - Knowledge

Source 📝

342:. Even if AfD was clean-up, this article has been given no chance to grow. Tag it, wait some time, THEN AfD. If the author says it is under construction, add the "under contruction" tag, and wait to see what he does. An internationally recognised sign and the effect that goes along with it could easily be notable. 324:
Ideally, there should be no prejudice to re-creating this. It's an article that seems to do little more than state the obvious, and the one interesting statement-- about a "legal disclaimer" -- is unsourced. I wouldn't be surprised if there is some undergrad or law school textbook that has a wet
325:
paint case. I imagine that content could be added (and sourced) as suggested by RHMED about the psychological urge to test the paint. My only fear is that there will be a spinoff article called "Wet paint sign in popular culture", though that too would be an OK addition to an article.
359:. I have to concur that this AFD is a bit premature. Keep per RMHED; though some of those sources might be trivial mentions, others show that the subject is sourceable, and I think it's reasonable to permit adequate time for that sourcing to take place. 287:. I don't think types of signs are notable, and the Google searches don't demonstrate notability (They all seem to be mentions in passing). If you want to demonstrate notability, please indicate a 254: 259:. With maybe a section on the psychological effect the wet paint sign seems to have on some people, bringing out an irrepressible urge to touch the paint to see if the sign is correct. 118: 426:
does not sound like it would make a good article, but I am currently looking out in the real world for a wet paint sign that I can snap a photo of for this article.
211: 257: 378: 382: 389:
article, as I'm sure there are countless film comedies and cartoons where this has been a plot device, but I'm not looking forward to
365: 85: 80: 89: 72: 17: 385:
looks very interesting, and there's plenty more where that came from. In reply to Mandsford we would probably have room for a
377:. Being commonplace adds to notability, rather than subtracting from it as seems to be assumed by the nominator and others. 415: 386: 312: 48:(non-admin closure), nearly unanimous keep, some delete's discounted as "AfD is not a vote, reasons are required." 452: 210:
This page is STILL under construction. I am planning on expanding this page in the coming days. I see nothing on
36: 451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
423: 390: 435: 402: 369: 351: 334: 316: 295: 277: 268: 241: 223: 202: 169: 152: 134: 54: 431: 398: 308: 219: 418:
can be a part of this article one day, but not a separate article until it grows to be large enough (see
76: 68: 60: 330: 292: 274: 237: 196: 165: 148: 427: 394: 360: 215: 130: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
347: 264: 291:
news mention or scholarly article demonstrating it and I will consider changing my vote.
419: 326: 233: 184: 161: 144: 50: 126: 106: 343: 178: 214:
that says that trivia is a reason a page under construction should be deleted.
260: 304: 232:
Could you please explain how this page is notable in any shape or form?
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113: 102: 98: 94: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 455:). No further edits should be made to this page. 212:Knowledge:Deletion of pages under construction 8: 273:Those sources are only mentions in passing. 125:Contested PROD. Trivia in the extreme. 7: 416:Wet paint signs in popular culture 387:Wet paint signs in popular culture 24: 208:Withdraw this nomination and KEEP 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 436:20:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 403:19:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 370:15:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 352:14:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 335:12:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 317:03:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 296:23:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 278:23:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 269:21:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 242:21:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 224:21:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 203:21:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 170:21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 153:21:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 135:21:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 55:20:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC) 303:Would it be appropriate to 143:not even close to notable. 472: 448:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 424:List of wet paint signs 391:List of wet paint signs 383:218 Google Books hits 307:this to Wiktionary? 368: 53: 44:The result was 463: 450: 364: 253:clearly notable 201: 193: 192: 191: 116: 110: 92: 49: 34: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 462: 461: 460: 459: 453:deletion review 446: 414:: I agree that 189: 187: 185: 182: 160:As said above. 112: 83: 67: 64: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 469: 467: 458: 457: 441: 440: 439: 438: 406: 405: 372: 354: 337: 319: 298: 282: 281: 280: 247: 246: 245: 244: 227: 226: 205: 172: 155: 123: 122: 69:Wet paint sign 63: 61:Wet paint sign 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 468: 456: 454: 449: 443: 442: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 410: 409: 408: 407: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 376: 373: 371: 367: 362: 358: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 338: 336: 332: 328: 323: 320: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 290: 286: 283: 279: 276: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 255: 252: 249: 248: 243: 239: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 206: 204: 200: 198: 194: 180: 176: 173: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 154: 150: 146: 142: 139: 138: 137: 136: 132: 128: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 447: 444: 428:Shaliya waya 420:Article size 411: 395:Phil Bridger 374: 361:UltraExactZZ 356: 339: 321: 300: 288: 284: 250: 216:Shaliya waya 207: 183: 174: 157: 140: 124: 45: 43: 31: 28: 379:The third 327:Mandsford 305:transwiki 366:Evidence 309:Jeremiah 289:specific 234:RockManQ 162:De728631 145:RockManQ 119:View log 51:Fr33kman 412:Comment 322:Comment 301:Comment 293:Bart133 275:Bart133 127:Ros0709 86:protect 81:history 344:Yobmod 285:Delete 177:Fails 175:Delete 158:Delete 141:Delete 114:delete 90:delete 261:RMHED 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 432:talk 399:talk 375:Keep 357:Keep 348:talk 340:Keep 331:talk 313:talk 265:talk 251:Keep 238:talk 220:talk 197:talk 179:WP:N 166:talk 149:talk 131:talk 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 46:Keep 422:). 381:of 188:tth 186:iMa 434:) 401:) 393:. 350:) 333:) 315:) 267:) 256:, 240:) 222:) 190:ew 181:. 168:) 151:) 133:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 430:( 397:( 363:~ 346:( 329:( 311:( 263:( 236:( 218:( 199:) 195:( 164:( 147:( 129:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Fr33kman
20:22, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Wet paint sign
Wet paint sign
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Ros0709
talk
21:11, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
RockManQ
talk
21:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
De728631
talk
21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
WP:N
iMatthew
talk
21:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.