316:, which makes a good case for notability. Lots of GScholar hits, too, indicating a level of prominence in her field. Together there seems to be enough to satisfy the GNG even if the SNGs might be borderline cases.
154:
211:. It seems like having a regular column in a major newspaper is enough to establish notability, though I have to admit I can't find anything in our policies to back that up.—
115:
148:
231:
88:
83:
92:
321:
17:
75:
169:
136:
317:
340:
36:
339:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
130:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
325:
302:
274:
246:
222:
202:
126:
57:
298:
270:
53:
198:
176:
162:
79:
314:
242:
217:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
189:, but coverage of the author herself seems pretty sparse. Does not seem to be a particularly
294:
285:
266:
257:
49:
142:
194:
71:
63:
238:
212:
313:. she has a book from a major university press, which was reviewed in the NYTimes
109:
190:
48:. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator.
288:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
260:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
333:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
293:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
265:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:She is a published author and writes a column in
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
343:). No further edits should be made to this page.
175:
8:
232:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
230:Note: This debate has been included in the
229:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
360:
326:16:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
303:00:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
275:00:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
58:01:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
247:02:26, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
223:22:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
203:20:29, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
336:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
318:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
193:author/columnist.
44:The result was
305:
277:
249:
235:
351:
338:
292:
290:
264:
262:
236:
220:
215:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
359:
358:
354:
353:
352:
350:
349:
348:
347:
341:deletion review
334:
283:
255:
218:
213:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
357:
355:
346:
345:
329:
328:
307:
306:
291:
280:
279:
278:
263:
252:
251:
250:
226:
225:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
356:
344:
342:
337:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
315:
312:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
289:
287:
282:
281:
276:
272:
268:
261:
259:
254:
253:
248:
244:
240:
233:
228:
227:
224:
221:
216:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Wendy Fonarow
69:
68:
65:
64:Wendy Fonarow
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
335:
332:
310:
284:
256:
208:
187:The Guardian
186:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
295:Ron Ritzman
267:Ron Ritzman
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
195:Beeblebrox
239:• Gene93k
209:Weak keep
286:Relisted
258:Relisted
116:View log
214:Chowbok
191:notable
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
127:Google
93:delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
322:talk
311:Keep
299:talk
271:talk
243:talk
199:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
237:--
177:TWL
114:– (
324:)
301:)
273:)
245:)
234:.
201:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
320:(
297:(
269:(
241:(
219:☠
197:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.