224:. The notability criteria guideline you link to, and suggest that I should adhere to, states that minor characters "should be merged with short descriptions into a 'List of characters.' This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, unless it becomes long, in which case a separate article for the list is good practice."
212:
isn't a vote count; the closing administrator examines the quality of the arguments made for and against the retention of an article. I am not going to attempt to work against my own purpose by trying to flesh out your argument for you simply because you are choosing to be curtly brief. If you feel
270:
ve linked to which support my nomination, and, again, it's really up to you to support your statement with arguments. This venue was once called votes for deletion; it no longer is. If you're content to let your statement stand upon what you've already said, I'm certainly not going to argue, as
265:
I think I can count on one hand the number of times someone accused of being uncivil has said, "You're right, I'm being uncivil," so there's really no use us debating the issue of whether or not you've been civil. Obviously, I disagree, but it's not as black and white as other situations on the
251:
Wrong. What I've written is perfectly civil. I've linked to the pages with the explanations; there was and is no need for me to re-type their contents here. That's why we have such pages. As for your nomination being based upon the guidelines and this being the appropriate venue: This is not
126:
Given the existence of a "list of Studio 60 characters" article already, Knowledge need not have an article covering every secondary, minor character on the show, especially when said character appeared on screen for only half an episode. Potential copyvio with the tirade transcription, too,
383:
Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a "List of characters." This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, unless it becomes long, in which case a separate article for the list is good
219:
It is my position that given that Wes
Mendell appeared in part of one episode and has been referred to only very sporadically — if at all — since, and thus very easily can be defined as a minor character, whereas one would not make the same argument about, say,
217:, by the way, and without the condescensing tone you're using in your responses — explain your argument, in the hopes that the closing admin will lend greater weight to the quality of the argument you laid down.
230:
already exists. And the appropriate venue to discuss removing the articles of minor characters and merging their content into a character-list article — the solution advocated by the page you linked to — is
119:
411:
326:
171:, AFD is not the way to deal with articles on minor characters for which there is only a little verifiable information. Please adhere to the guidelines.
92:
87:
17:
96:
79:
226:
My nomination is based on this very guideline you're linking to, especially given such a character-list article for
445:
36:
444:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
147:
180:
I don't see how the guidelines you cite support your premise. In fact, one specifically supports mine. —
418:
428:
398:
365:
353:
337:
314:
282:
260:
246:
204:
191:
175:
154:
138:
61:
277:
241:
186:
168:
133:
55:
308:
425:
395:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
256:. Please go and read the guidelines again, clicking on the hyperlink on the word "merging".
362:
83:
272:
236:
214:
181:
128:
391:
374:
330:
197:
164:
50:
346:
334:
232:
221:
209:
350:
257:
201:
172:
151:
113:
301:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
75:
67:
196:
Then please read them again, paying particular attention to the words in
390:
I think it's fair to say there is a consensus for merging, so I'll
266:
wiki. As for the explanations, I've quoted portions of the pages
213:
this article should not be deleted, it's your responsibility to —
438:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
349:. I believe this is how the other associated AfDs were handled.
424:. I will leave this until after the discussion is closed. --
271:
such an action only assists the deletion of this article. —
109:
105:
101:
169:
Knowledge:Notability#Dealing with non-notable topics
306:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
448:). No further edits should be made to this page.
412:List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip characters
327:List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip characters
410:. All that's left is to redirect the page to
252:"Articles for merging". This is Articles for
8:
235:, this very venue we're in at the moment. —
7:
24:
333:. Why is this even a question?
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
465:
429:23:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
399:23:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
394:and perform the merge. --
366:15:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
361:per Otto. No question. --
354:18:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
338:06:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
315:04:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
283:00:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
261:22:17, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
247:20:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
205:18:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
192:16:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
176:14:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
155:13:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
139:16:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
62:19:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
441:Please do not modify it.
146:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
387:
200:that are in boldface.
380:
150:. It is listed now.
359:Merge and redirect
343:Merge and redirect
323:Merge and redirect
373:per Otto and per
317:
281:
245:
190:
137:
456:
443:
423:
417:
414:and tag it with
311:
305:
302:
275:
239:
184:
131:
117:
99:
60:
34:
464:
463:
459:
458:
457:
455:
454:
453:
452:
446:deletion review
439:
421:
415:
408:Merge performed
309:
300:
90:
74:
71:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
462:
460:
451:
450:
434:
433:
432:
431:
402:
401:
379:
378:
368:
356:
340:
319:
318:
304:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
225:
218:
160:
159:
158:
157:
124:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
461:
449:
447:
442:
436:
435:
430:
427:
420:
413:
409:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
397:
393:
389:
388:
386:
385:
376:
372:
369:
367:
364:
360:
357:
355:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
316:
313:
312:
310:Daniel Bryant
303:
298:
297:
284:
279:
274:
269:
264:
263:
262:
259:
255:
250:
249:
248:
243:
238:
234:
229:
223:
222:Harriet Hayes
216:
211:
208:
207:
206:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
188:
183:
179:
178:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
161:
156:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
135:
130:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
54:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
440:
437:
426:Black Falcon
419:R from merge
407:
396:Black Falcon
382:
381:
370:
358:
342:
322:
307:
299:
267:
253:
227:
127:methinks. —
125:
56:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
363:Scientizzle
76:Wes Mendell
68:Wes Mendell
377:, point 2:
273:Whedonette
237:Whedonette
182:Whedonette
148:incomplete
129:Whedonette
384:practice.
228:Studio 60
392:go ahead
347:Otto4711
335:Otto4711
254:deletion
120:View log
375:WP:FICT
351:Caknuck
331:WP:FICT
258:Uncle G
215:civilly
202:Uncle G
198:WP:FICT
173:Uncle G
165:WP:FICT
163:As per
152:DumbBOT
93:protect
88:history
233:WP:AFD
210:WP:AFD
97:delete
57:scribe
371:Merge
114:views
106:watch
102:links
46:merge
16:<
345:per
329:per
278:ping
268:you'
242:ping
187:ping
167:and
134:ping
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
325:to
118:– (
52:WjB
422:}}
416:{{
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
280:)
276:(
244:)
240:(
189:)
185:(
136:)
132:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.