103:. Nothing seems to indicate that this mall has any sort of particular notability. Is there really any chance that an article about that topic can reach any sort of encyclopedic value? And are you not at least a bit intrigued by the fact that precedents establish that malls which are not otherwise notable should not have their own article?
483:
notable. But few are notable on a wider scale. I think it would be better in most cases like these if the mall was mentioned within the suburb's article, but with 50 or more
Australian malls already having articles, I think precedent might have already been set. Actually, looking over some of the
328:, as distinct from mere facts. The history and economic impact of shopping malls in general is a very important encyclopedic topic. The precise location and composition of any individual shopping mall will only be in very exceptional circumstances. This one appears not to be exceptional. —
348:
Some of the history information has been added to the article. However its history information is a bit harder to be obtained due to lack of searchable information besides the documentation from the local government. I've tried to add the information as much as possible.
190:
article. Also a reminder that this is not a vote so that whether you vote for keep or delete is not as important as providing reasons to explain how this article does or does not conform to the existing policies, guidelines and precedents on
Knowledge (XXG).
295:
as per above. I live in Perth (although about 20km away) and agree with most of the information given. I can verify it is one of the major shopping malls in the area however that would involve me uploading copyrighted images.
427:
per nom. Existence and verifiability are not the point. No notability stated, implied, or even attempted. If I change the names in this article, it will look like every other mall article with little effort.
383:
268:
68:
240:
showing that this shopping centre is exists. In contrast to the other shopping centres, there's not a good point to deleting this kind of articles. --
223:
is neither policy nor guideline; it is merely "an essay expressing the opinions and ideas of some
Wikipedians." Personally I disagree with it.
320:: just another unremarkable set of buildings doing the job they were built to do. Knowledge (XXG) is not a retail directory, it is an
17:
484:
existing mall articles, most are little more than stubs, and should probably be merged into the article for their suburb.--
253:
Evidence of existence is not evidence of importance. If I post a photo of myself, can I have a vanity article, please? —
515:
36:
514:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
500:
488:
466:
454:
432:
418:
406:
393:
371:
357:
337:
312:
300:
279:
262:
248:
231:
208:
195:
178:
166:
149:
136:
120:
107:
92:
75:
52:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
390:
368:
228:
146:
220:
200:
Why not move the text in
Innaloo article to Westfield Innaloo, it seems this would make more sense. --
354:
276:
245:
205:
117:
89:
192:
104:
72:
49:
163:
333:
258:
224:
58:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
64:
463:
497:
446:
367:. Verifiable mall from independent sources shown in the article. Notable enough for mine.
415:
350:
272:
241:
201:
113:
85:
429:
133:
329:
309:
254:
175:
84:, need some expansion of the article, already put as a Australian related stub. --
297:
267:
Evidence is one of the way to make the article verifable. In contrast to the
112:
The features and development of
Westfield innaloo has been expended a bit. --
485:
403:
187:
159:
345:
Haeleth has articulated the issue very well, and I concur. -- whpq
508:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
186:
I just want to note that the mall is already mentioned in the
271:, which there are no third party sources at there. --
227:
is neutral and verifiable, and that's enough for me.
67:, malls are not inherently notable. See for instance
69:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Werribee_Plaza
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
518:). No further edits should be made to this page.
308:please per above it is notable and interesting
402:- verifiable and notable to local citizens. --
215:Okay, I take your hint. Here's an expansion.
8:
496:- this mall is notable and verifiable.
382:: This debate has been included in the
479:- sure, most malls are verifiable and
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
99:although once again the question is
384:list of Australia-related deletions
174:Perfectly notable and interesting.
24:
158:, and refer to its existence in
462:notable local shopping mall.
1:
132:No assertion of notability.
535:
221:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
53:09:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
501:16:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
489:03:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
467:10:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
455:07:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
433:07:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
419:05:07, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
407:03:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
394:03:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
372:03:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
358:01:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
338:14:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
313:13:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
301:11:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
280:14:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
263:14:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
249:07:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
232:07:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
209:06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
196:06:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
179:06:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
167:06:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
150:06:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
137:06:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
121:07:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
108:06:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
93:06:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
76:06:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
511:Please do not modify it.
236:At least there's have a
32:Please do not modify it.
414:- as above from I@n.
269:AfD for Werribee Plaza
71:and countless others.
440:, verifiable mall. -
324:. It is a place for
391:Capitalistroadster
369:Capitalistroadster
152:
396:
387:
336:
261:
225:Westfield Innaloo
141:
59:Westfield Innaloo
526:
513:
452:
444:
388:
378:
332:
257:
34:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
525:
524:
523:
522:
516:deletion review
509:
453:
450:
445:
442:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
532:
530:
521:
520:
504:
503:
491:
469:
457:
449:
441:
435:
422:
409:
397:
376:
374:
362:
361:
360:
340:
315:
303:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
238:photo evidence
212:
211:
181:
169:
153:
139:
126:
125:
124:
123:
96:
95:
65:Per precedents
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
531:
519:
517:
512:
506:
505:
502:
499:
495:
492:
490:
487:
482:
478:
475:
474:
470:
468:
465:
461:
458:
456:
448:
439:
436:
434:
431:
426:
423:
420:
417:
413:
410:
408:
405:
401:
398:
395:
392:
385:
381:
377:
375:
373:
370:
366:
363:
359:
356:
352:
347:
346:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
311:
307:
304:
302:
299:
294:
291:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
194:
193:Pascal.Tesson
189:
185:
182:
180:
177:
173:
170:
168:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
140:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:
122:
119:
115:
111:
110:
109:
106:
105:Pascal.Tesson
102:
98:
97:
94:
91:
87:
83:
80:
79:
78:
77:
74:
73:Pascal.Tesson
70:
66:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
510:
507:
493:
480:
476:
472:
471:
459:
437:
424:
411:
399:
379:
364:
342:
325:
322:encyclopedia
321:
317:
305:
292:
237:
229:Snottygobble
216:
183:
171:
155:
147:Snottygobble
142:
129:
100:
81:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
464:Nachoman-au
101:expand how?
498:Orangehead
447:Randwicked
416:Lankiveil
412:Weak keep
400:Weak keep
351:Shinjiman
326:knowledge
273:Shinjiman
242:Shinjiman
202:Shinjiman
114:Shinjiman
86:Shinjiman
430:Tychocat
134:Medtopic
481:locally
473:Comment
330:Haeleth
310:Yuckfoo
255:Haeleth
188:Innaloo
184:Comment
176:Rebecca
160:Innaloo
130:Delete.
425:Delete
343:Delete
318:Delete
156:Delete
477:Merge
298:MER-C
172:Keep.
164:Steve
16:<
494:Keep
486:Mako
460:Keep
438:Keep
380:Note
365:Keep
334:Talk
306:keep
293:Keep
259:Talk
217:Keep
162:. --
143:Keep
82:Keep
46:keep
404:I@n
389:--
386:.
353:⇔
349:--
275:⇔
244:⇔
219:.
204:⇔
145:.
116:⇔
88:⇔
48:.
451:҉
443:҉
421:.
355:♨
277:♨
246:♨
206:♨
118:♨
90:♨
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.