554:, but every time I do, they get deleted. I had the impression that when a franchise offshoot didn't have its own template (Disney's The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Andrew Lloyd Webber's Phantom of the Opera etc.), they were merged with the template about the original property. But despite other parts of the Tangled franchise being in the Rapunzel template, the songs keep getting deleted. Now that I know the article is being kept, I want to bring up this discussion. Am I in the right or in the wrong?--
480:
says: "Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be
276:: Potential future article beats actual current article every time. These songs from musicals may not have been released as singles, but have been extensively analysed and there is a wealth of information about their context within the movie. Looking for sources will demonstrate its notability.--
310:. In response to your critique, I went ahead and sourced lots of information on the song's production, and added a book source. Again, this doesn't cover every single source available, but it is certainly more than "blogs and film reviews" and demonstrates the song's notability.
195:
Contested prod. Article does not assert its independent notability. The mere fact of being a Disney song is not sufficient. Was not released as a single. No thematic info, composers' notes, sales info, awards, extremely limited reception.
164:
213:
233:
158:
485:. It looks like I'm going to get overruled by sheer numbers here, but these are not policy-based votes, and they run directly counter to established notability guidelines.
117:
124:
253:
90:
85:
94:
77:
399:
As per
Quenhitran. Reviewed article in time since AfD nomination, and there's been significant expansion. Notability appears to be established now. --
481:
created." I think film reviews are pretty much the same thing. We're not counting how many times the song gets mentioned, we're looking for
179:
146:
17:
499:
Concur with NinjaRobotPirate. First, the song, while very nice, is not notable in and of itself. The only really notable song from
81:
140:
563:
534:
516:
494:
468:
459:
The creator has established notability for the article. No matter what'd be its eventual quality, it should not be deleted.
451:
412:
387:
358:
302:
285:
265:
245:
225:
205:
59:
326:
339:. The article has been expanded considerably since AfD nomination, and I'm curious to see what would come up eventually.
525:" is "really notable", it doesn't mean this song isn't still notable at all. The former song is simply *more* notable.--
582:
136:
40:
293:. Not independently notable. Basically sourced to blogs and film reviews. I don't see anything obvious on Google.
490:
298:
476:. Yes, it has many citations, but some of them are to unreliable sources, and most of the rest of film reviews.
186:
73:
65:
464:
201:
314:
578:
486:
294:
152:
36:
512:
434:
406:
352:
460:
172:
482:
477:
368:
448:
197:
56:
559:
551:
530:
383:
322:
281:
261:
241:
221:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
508:
425:
401:
343:
504:
445:
53:
555:
526:
379:
318:
277:
257:
237:
217:
111:
550:
In other (but related) news, I've been trying to add these songs from
Tangled to
503:
is "I See The Light." Second, only three of the sources cited appear to pass
371:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
571:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
214:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
171:
234:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
585:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
252:Note: This debate has been included in the
232:Note: This debate has been included in the
212:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:
231:
211:
254:list of Film-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
308:Article has been improved since vote
545:This song in the Rapunzel template
24:
1:
439:) 16:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
602:
564:18:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
535:16:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
517:12:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
495:18:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
469:16:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
452:23:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
413:16:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
388:15:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
60:00:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
574:Please do not modify it.
359:10:42, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
303:01:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
286:04:47, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
266:00:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
246:00:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
226:00:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
206:19:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
74:When Will My Life Begin?
66:When Will My Life Begin?
32:Please do not modify it.
442:struck duplicate !vote
483:significant coverage
329:) 07:41, 7 July 2014
507:at first glance. --
48:The result was
552:Template:Rapunzel
421:As stated above.
390:
331:
317:comment added by
268:
248:
228:
593:
576:
487:NinjaRobotPirate
437:
431:
428:
424:
409:
404:
377:
373:
355:
349:
346:
342:
330:
311:
295:NinjaRobotPirate
190:
189:
175:
127:
115:
97:
34:
601:
600:
596:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
589:
583:deletion review
572:
547:
523:I See The Light
435:
429:
426:
422:
407:
402:
366:
353:
347:
344:
340:
312:
274:Keep as creator
132:
123:
88:
72:
69:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
599:
597:
588:
587:
567:
566:
546:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
521:Just because "
471:
461:Forbidden User
454:
415:
393:
392:
391:
375:
374:
363:
362:
361:
334:
333:
332:
288:
270:
269:
249:
229:
193:
192:
129:
68:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
598:
586:
584:
580:
575:
569:
568:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
544:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
479:
475:
472:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
450:
447:
443:
440:
438:
432:
420:
416:
414:
411:
410:
405:
398:
395:
394:
389:
385:
381:
376:
372:
370:
365:
364:
360:
356:
350:
338:
335:
328:
324:
320:
316:
309:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
198:Axem Titanium
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
573:
570:
522:
500:
473:
456:
441:
418:
417:
400:
396:
367:
336:
313:— Preceding
307:
290:
273:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
120:
49:
47:
31:
28:
159:free images
509:Coolcaesar
436:talk to me
354:talk to me
579:talk page
478:WP:NSONGS
258:• Gene93k
238:• Gene93k
218:• Gene93k
37:talk page
581:or in a
446:RoySmith
369:Relisted
327:contribs
315:unsigned
118:View log
54:RoySmith
39:or in a
556:Coin945
527:Coin945
501:Tangled
474:Comment
423:ALittle
380:Jenks24
341:ALittle
319:Coin945
278:Coin945
165:WP refs
153:scholar
91:protect
86:history
449:(talk)
403:McDoob
291:Delete
137:Google
95:delete
57:(talk)
505:WP:RS
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
112:views
104:watch
100:links
52:. --
16:<
560:talk
531:talk
513:talk
491:talk
465:talk
457:Keep
419:Keep
408:AU93
397:Keep
384:talk
337:Keep
323:talk
299:talk
282:talk
262:talk
242:talk
222:talk
202:talk
173:FENS
147:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
50:keep
444:--
430:nhi
427:Que
348:nhi
345:Que
187:TWL
116:– (
562:)
533:)
515:)
493:)
467:)
386:)
357:)
325:•
301:)
284:)
264:)
256:.
244:)
236:.
224:)
216:.
204:)
167:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
558:(
529:(
511:(
489:(
463:(
433:(
382:(
351:(
321:(
297:(
280:(
260:(
240:(
220:(
200:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
121:·
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.